The window will close, but it popping to the top while it fetches the
map (radar mostly) is very disruptive and it's a recent change.
William
KI4HDU
On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:53 PM, "Curt, WE7U" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, William McKeehan wrote:
I am running the latest from C
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, William McKeehan wrote:
> I am running the latest from CVS on my Windows box under cygwin. I have
> noticed a new "feature".
>
> Every time it fetches a web based map, a cygwin shell window opens. It's
> rather annoying.
>
> Anyone else seeing this? Anyone know how to stop it?
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007, Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:
> I have created additional .xbm's for WX warnings. I have three - heat
> (HEAT), svr_tstrm (SVRTSM) , and wind_chill (?). Heat would be red,
> svr_tstrm in red and I would put wind_chill in red.
>
> I can send them to you under separate cover. I w
Eric,
Right now, Missouri is quite filled up in RED HEAT
73 from 807,
Richard, N6NKO
Eric Christensen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You should be seeing the advisories that are up in Southeastern VA.
They were issued around 1800z for tomorrow afternoon. It is goi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You should be seeing the advisories that are up in Southeastern VA.
They were issued around 1800z for tomorrow afternoon. It is going to
get hot around here!
73s,
Eric W4OTN
Richard Polivka, N6NKO wrote:
> Found that I did not have the correct zon
Found that I did not have the correct zone maps installed on the laptop.
Heat advisories are now showing up. This is now a good thing.
73 from 807,
Richard, N6NKO
___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list
Jason,
I can redo the .xbm's to allow for the dithering and proper stacking.
The ones that I created were built to fill in the gaps.
I can go through them and make sure that they will properly stack and
not obliterate.
Something to do while in my lazyboy listening to classical music
enjoyi
On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:24 AM, Eric H Christensen wrote:
Shouldn't there be a way to prioritize them? For example, the
Thunderstorm Warning should be trumped by the Tornado Warning.
The current xbm's that I put together would "stack" - the text was
placed so that text from one wouldn't go on
Time of issue. A SVR will invariably be issued for an area prior to a
TOR. A TOR and SVR are both short-term and short-fuse warnings.
Service messages can screw with this logic, however.
In the new scheme of warnings, the smaller polygon-based Storm Based
Warnings should show up as smaller d
Eric,
The code, from what I see, can be prioritized. Last night, I had two up
at once over Chicago - Svr Tstorm and Tornado. If they can be
consistently layered, the need for priority goes out the window. The
layering would allow for showing all warnings that are active for the area.
73 from 80
Shouldn't there be a way to prioritize them? For example, the Thunderstorm
Warning should be trumped by the Tornado Warning. I think UIV had a
prioritization scheme that showed the color for the highest alert and then on
mouse over would show all of the alerts for that particular county.
73s,
11 matches
Mail list logo
