Keith Kaiser wrote:
By the way what is the difference between an object and an item?
Items are basically objects that don't include a timestamp in the packet
format. Objects are better supported in APRS software than items are, so
it's safer to always use objects instead of items. I understand
That is a very large assumption.
The big question is why do the gateway stations that show up on Xastir
not have there own switch to show or not show? Or at least let us set
them up with an tactical call, why was that disable in the first place?
Thanks... tomorrow will tell
On Oct 30,
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Keith Kaiser wrote:
The big question is why do the gateway stations that show up on Xastir not
have there own switch to show or not show? Or at least let us set them up
with an tactical call, why was that disable in the first place?
I'd have to look at Xastir in-memory
Correct, objects currently can not have tactical calls ... too bad,
something to work on.
Also; here are some notes about creating objects in the ~/.xastir/
config/object.log
1) The format is very specific (see examples), spacing and length of
name after the initial semi-colon, plus the
Suppose I want to create an object for all the local hospitals in our
area for a SET we have this weekend. Is there a way to create a file,
in advance, and just activate it when needed? Similar maybe to the way
we can create a file for tactical calls?
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Keith Kaiser wrote:
Suppose I want to create an object for all the local hospitals in our area
for a SET we have this weekend. Is there a way to create a file, in advance,
and just activate it when needed? Similar maybe to the way we can create a
file for tactical calls?
I would want them to be transmitted over RF. What would be the format
if I wanted to use a text editor to set them up, with about 10 to do
that would take much less time than one at a time inside of Xastir.
On Oct 30, 2008, at 10:46 AM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Keith Kaiser
More specifically Curt what I would like to do is this.
I want only tactical calls to show up and I want whatever objects I
have created to show up.
Since I can not assign tactical calls to objects or even in some cases
items like packet gateways, I have to find another way for them to
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Keith Kaiser wrote:
I would want them to be transmitted over RF. What would be the format if I
wanted to use a text editor to set them up, with about 10 to do that would
take much less time than one at a time inside of Xastir.
Set up ONE in Xastir first, making sure that
I'll do this sounds like fun.
Thanks.
On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:24 AM, Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Keith Kaiser wrote:
I would want them to be transmitted over RF. What would be the
format if I wanted to use a text editor to set them up, with about
10 to do that would take
The best way to handle this is run your APRS stations on a frequency
other than 144.39. This assumes you don't need, or can replace, all
the digipeaters and other infrastructure on 144.39.
Craig
On Oct 30, 2008, at 9:22 AM, Keith Kaiser wrote:
More specifically Curt what I would like to
It's just you. (:
http://www.findu.com/cgi-bin/find.cgi?gpsl
-Jason
kg4wsv
___
Xastir mailing list
Xastir@xastir.org
http://lists.xastir.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xastir
This is again similar to what I was having when the new font system was
implemented. My problem was solved by upgrading to lesstif 0.95 from 0.93
Just about anything I touched with a mouse click caused a crash.
Using Slack 9.1 and 12.1
--
...73 Tom ve7did
Propagation Knows NO
Yep, looks like upgrading lesstif did the trick, can't get it to crash
anymore.
I was using lesstif 0.93.95, upgraded to 0.95
Quoting Tom ve7did [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is again similar to what I was having when the new font system was
implemented. My problem was solved by upgrading to
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 10:41:44PM -0400, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
I have been playing with xastir lately, and besides noticing the
newest development version crashing everytime I change settings on
interfaces. I have tested this
I was using the latest snapshot from sourceforge. I haven't used the
other development snapshots before this one.
I'll give cvs a try as soon as I have some time.
Any idea where to look in the source for the incoming object recording
*feature*, so I can manually hack it out on my build?
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:28:32PM -0400, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
I was using the latest snapshot from sourceforge. I haven't used the
other development snapshots before this one.
I'll give cvs a try as soon as I have some time.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Patrick Domack wrote:
Any idea where to look in the source for the incoming object recording
*feature*, so I can manually hack it out on my build?
Well, if you hack out that feature you're likely to disable
reception of anybody's objects or items, and unlikely to see
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:23:35PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] flavor, containing:
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Patrick Domack wrote:
Any idea where to look in the source for the incoming object recording
*feature*, so I can manually hack it out on my
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Tom Russo wrote:
If you come up with something good for a fix, send it our way. If
you have further questions, send them our way too.
At least one useful APRS script
(http://mckeehan.homeip.net/amateurradio/APRS/aprstracker.htm) makes use of
this feature by injecting
20 matches
Mail list logo
