I'll have to look at the formal Watch By County messages and see what
Dale's sending, maybe today. Options would be to take the parallelogram
(which I don't think SPC's issuing anymore) and seeing which counties
are included. Warnings by polygon will mention affected counties but
the vertices
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Gerry Creager wrote:
> Just a reminder that SVR, TOR and FF watches are now county-based rather
> than parallelogram-based, and as of 1 OCT SVR, TOR, FFW and SMW warnings
> will be polygon (storm-) based rather than lighting up a whole county.
How does that affect us?
Are th
Jason Winningham wrote:
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Alex Carver wrote:
Actually, I do have two copies of the county files for
the same reason you do, one to show weather alerts and
one to show counties.
This is a roundabout way of getting there (I got there by accident), but
the National A
--- Jason Winningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a roundabout way of getting there (I got
> there by accident),
> but the National Atlas has a counties shapefile
> that's different from
> the NOAA counties shapefile. I use Nat'l Atlas for
> drawing maps and
> the NOAA version for al
On Apr 26, 2007, at 4:50 PM, Alex Carver wrote:
Actually, I do have two copies of the county files for
the same reason you do, one to show weather alerts and
one to show counties.
This is a roundabout way of getting there (I got there by accident),
but the National Atlas has a counties shap
--- Tom Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:39:34PM -0700, we
> recorded a bogon-computron collision of the
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Mike Fenske wrote:
> >
> > > You can get by with one dbfawk file if the dbf
> fields are the
>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:39:34PM -0700, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> flavor, containing:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Mike Fenske wrote:
>
> > You can get by with one dbfawk file if the dbf fields are the
> > same for each shapefile and you want each shapefile
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Mike Fenske wrote:
> You can get by with one dbfawk file if the dbf fields are the
> same for each shapefile and you want each shapefile displayed the
> same. Sounds like this is what you want. I have done just that
> here with a large shapefile I split up. Put the dbfawk
Alex Carver wrote:
I was trying to customize some of the dbfawk files the
other day and was having difficulty figuring out why
it didn't work. On my setup, to speed up loading,
I've broken up a lot of the shape files into tiled
sections (I forgot the tool used but it was on the web
page somewher
I was trying to customize some of the dbfawk files the
other day and was having difficulty figuring out why
it didn't work. On my setup, to speed up loading,
I've broken up a lot of the shape files into tiled
sections (I forgot the tool used but it was on the web
page somewhere at one point).
Any
10 matches
Mail list logo
