On 24 Jan 2008, at 09:18, Brad Douglas wrote:
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 08:53 -0800, Curt, WE7U wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Brad Douglas wrote:
Like I said before, let's leave this up to Xastir developers to
decide
what works best for them. We've both made good points they can
reflect
upon,
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 08:53 -0800, Curt, WE7U wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Brad Douglas wrote:
>
> > Like I said before, let's leave this up to Xastir developers to decide
> > what works best for them. We've both made good points they can reflect
> > upon, so let's leave it at that. If you want
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Brad Douglas wrote:
> Like I said before, let's leave this up to Xastir developers to decide
> what works best for them. We've both made good points they can reflect
> upon, so let's leave it at that. If you want to discuss it further, we
> should probably take it off the li
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 19:50 -0600, Jason KG4WSV wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2008 7:00 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Then you're doing it wrong. ;-)
>
> Hey, I'm never wrong. I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
Ditto. ;-)
> OTOH, there were some is
On Jan 19, 2008 7:00 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then you're doing it wrong. ;-)
>
Hey, I'm never wrong. I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken.
> OTOH, there were some issues in the
> early development of the wx framework. Those issues are long gone.
Well, it ha
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 18:41 -0600, Jason KG4WSV wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 4:36 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would highly recommend using a wxPython GUI approach.
>
> I tried wxSomethingorother and it wouldn't compile out of the tarball
> on Solaris or Mac OS X as best
On Jan 19, 2008 4:36 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would highly recommend using a wxPython GUI approach.
>
I tried wxSomethingorother and it wouldn't compile out of the tarball on
Solaris or Mac OS X as best I recall. I was totally unimpressed.
IMO, among the goals should be
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:44 -0600, Jason KG4WSV wrote:
> http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/19/0130250&from=rss
>
> I recall in the occasional xastir version 2 discussion, one of the issues is
> cross-platform portability. Qt is a contender, but there were serious
> concerns about the Qt li
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/19/0130250&from=rss
I recall in the occasional xastir version 2 discussion, one of the issues is
cross-platform portability. Qt is a contender, but there were serious
concerns about the Qt license and how it fit with xastir's license.
Now, it seems, Troll