Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-02-13 Thread John Ronan
On 24 Jan 2008, at 09:18, Brad Douglas wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 08:53 -0800, Curt, WE7U wrote: On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Brad Douglas wrote: Like I said before, let's leave this up to Xastir developers to decide what works best for them. We've both made good points they can reflect upon,

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-24 Thread Brad Douglas
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 08:53 -0800, Curt, WE7U wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Brad Douglas wrote: > > > Like I said before, let's leave this up to Xastir developers to decide > > what works best for them. We've both made good points they can reflect > > upon, so let's leave it at that. If you want

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-22 Thread Curt, WE7U
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Brad Douglas wrote: > Like I said before, let's leave this up to Xastir developers to decide > what works best for them. We've both made good points they can reflect > upon, so let's leave it at that. If you want to discuss it further, we > should probably take it off the li

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-19 Thread Brad Douglas
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 19:50 -0600, Jason KG4WSV wrote: > > > On Jan 19, 2008 7:00 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then you're doing it wrong. ;-) > > Hey, I'm never wrong. I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken. Ditto. ;-) > OTOH, there were some is

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-19 Thread Jason KG4WSV
On Jan 19, 2008 7:00 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then you're doing it wrong. ;-) > Hey, I'm never wrong. I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken. > OTOH, there were some issues in the > early development of the wx framework. Those issues are long gone. Well, it ha

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-19 Thread Brad Douglas
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 18:41 -0600, Jason KG4WSV wrote: > On Jan 19, 2008 4:36 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would highly recommend using a wxPython GUI approach. > > I tried wxSomethingorother and it wouldn't compile out of the tarball > on Solaris or Mac OS X as best

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-19 Thread Jason KG4WSV
On Jan 19, 2008 4:36 PM, Brad Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would highly recommend using a wxPython GUI approach. > I tried wxSomethingorother and it wouldn't compile out of the tarball on Solaris or Mac OS X as best I recall. I was totally unimpressed. IMO, among the goals should be

Re: [Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-19 Thread Brad Douglas
On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:44 -0600, Jason KG4WSV wrote: > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/19/0130250&from=rss > > I recall in the occasional xastir version 2 discussion, one of the issues is > cross-platform portability. Qt is a contender, but there were serious > concerns about the Qt li

[Xastir] new Qt license and xastir v2

2008-01-19 Thread Jason KG4WSV
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/19/0130250&from=rss I recall in the occasional xastir version 2 discussion, one of the issues is cross-platform portability. Qt is a contender, but there were serious concerns about the Qt license and how it fit with xastir's license. Now, it seems, Troll