s we were doing, it would not be called research,
> would it?"
> --Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Nathan Harper ---09/04/2020 04:02:42
> AM---remoteshell is in the default postscripts in the postscript]Nathan
> Harper ---09/04/2020 04:02:42 AM---
; "If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
> would it?"
> --Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Nathan Harper ---09/03/2020 12:04:57
> PM---As a bit more of a followup: No postscripts are running on]Nathan
> H
H into the node without having to
provide a password, and postscripts can be run via 'updatenode'
On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 16:52, Nathan Harper
wrote:
> Version 2.16.1 (git commit aeaa863cb2712c9f7b4535656e980ffebaf1d19f, built
> Wed Aug 26 00:38:39 EDT 2020)
>
> On Thu, 3 Se
;If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called research,
> would it?"
> --Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Nathan Harper ---09/03/2020 09:42:34
> AM---Hi, We've run into an issue with deploying CentOS 8.2 nodes]Nathan
> Harper
nning on a CentOS 8.2 system:
++ . /xcatpost/xcatlib.sh
> +++ declare -a array_nic_params
> +++ declare -a array_extra_param_names
> +++ declare -a array_extra_param_values
> ++ return_value=0
> ++ set +x
and that's it. Any clues what might be wrong?
--
*Nathan
be the latest in the repo.
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 16:14, Nathan Harper
wrote:
> Did you run "mknb ppc64" on management node prior to booting Genesis ?
>
>
> I did, and I've just tried doing so again to be doubly sure. I can see
> the kernel and fs.gz being picked
t;
> --Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Nathan Harper ---01/14/2020 05:07:52
> AM---I am attempting to integrate a newly arrive AC922 node with]Nathan
> Harper ---01/14/2020 05:07:52 AM---I am attempting to integrate a newly
> arrive AC922 node with
c.
In the interests of expediency, I went ahead and configured the node
manually, and stateful installs, rpower etc all work correctly.
Has anyone successfully genesis booted an AC922 from an x86 xCAT node?
--
*Nathan Harper*
___
xCAT-user mailing list
t;>>>>
>>>>> xcat.genesis.doxcat: Received destiny=
>>>>> xcat.genesis.doxcat: The destiny=, destiny parameters=
>>>>> xcat.genesis.doxcat: Unrecognized directive (dest=)
>>>>> xcat.genesis.doxcat: ... Will retry xCAT in 40 seconds
>&
>
> _______
> xCAT-user mailing list
> xCAT-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xcat-user
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> *Imam Toufique*
> *213-700-5485*
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
&
cxh...@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Nathan Harper ---02/04/2019 12:34:58
> PM---Hi, As requested, from cluster.log]Nathan Harper ---02/04/2019
> 12:34:58 PM---Hi, As requested, from cluster.log
>
> From: Nathan Harper
> To: xCAT Users Mailing list
&g
;
> xcat.discovery.seqdiscovery
> xcat.genesis.doxcat
> xcat.discovery.aaadiscovery
>
>
> Can u also try ip address instead of hostname? nodediscoverstart
> noderange=172.19.24.12 -V
>
>
> Thanks,
> Casandra
>
> .......
>
or something to do. Can you pping/ssh to the nodes?
>
> *Ryan Bowen *| Integration Systems Engineer | *SHI International Corp* |
> *C:* (609)619-2571 | *E:* ryan_bo...@shi.com
>
> *From:* Nathan Harper
> *Sent:* Monday, February 4, 2019 4:44 AM
> *To:* xCAT Users Mailing list
&
t; Thanks,
> Casandra
>
>
> ...
> Casandra Hong Qiu
> Phone: (845) 433-9291, t/l 293-9291
> Office: Building 8, 3-B-04
> cxh...@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Nathan Harper ---01/31/2019 12:36:00
> PM---Hi all, We're in the process of sett
(845) 433-9291, t/l 293-9291
> Office: Building 8, 3-B-04
> cxh...@us.ibm.com
>
>
>
> Nathan Harper ---01/31/2019 12:36:00 PM---Hi all, We're in the
> process of setting up two new xCAT systems. As it's a small
>
> From: Nathan Harper
> To: xCAT User
Hi all,
We're in the process of setting up two new xCAT systems. As it's a small
number of nodes we're just doing sequential discovery, and on the first
system (done 2 weeks ago) the node discovery works as expected.
However, on the next one (today), the systems will boot into the genesis
image
gnetworks and default route
> Date: Wed, Jan 10, 2018 8:28 AM
>
> The gateway field should be used to set the default route. Make sure
> there's just one gateway set if you use multiple nics, otherwise the last
> one will win.
>
> On Jan 9, 2018 12:16 PM, Nathan Harper wrote
Hi,
We've been using confignetworks post OS install to take the installnic and
bond it with another interface.
As the default gateway is set by DHCP, is there some config I'm missing in
the nics table to get it to set the default gateway?
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Lead
*e: *
e the boot mode as they can't boot from the
Mellanox cards in UEFI mode anyway!
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Lead
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk // *t: * 0117 906 1104 // *m: * 07875 510891 //
*w: * www.cfms.org.uk <http://www.cfms.org.uk%22> //
CFMS Services Ltd // Bristol &am
Hi,
Ok - any workarounds in the meantime?
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Lead
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk // *t: * 0117 906 1104 // *m: * 07875 510891 //
*w: * www.cfms.org.uk <http://www.cfms.org.uk%22> //
CFMS Services Ltd // Bristol & Bath Science Park // Dirac Crescent /
a CentOS 7 genesis image (
https://github.com/xcat2/xcat-core/issues/2258)
Did this ever make it's way in? Alternatively, is there a simple way to
give an upgraded kernel?
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Lead
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk // *t: * 0117 906 1104 // *m: * 078
I have a similar issue with some non-IBM/Lenovo equipment. Old dx360s work,
other new equipment boots, installs but when instructed by PXE to boot locally,
you get no more. I have had to work around by setting boot order to HDD post
install.
Regards,
Nathan
> On 12 May 2017, at 17:06, Gilad B
perfect - somewhere along the road something went awry with the name
resolution for the management node. Problem solved!
--
___
xCAT-user mailing list
xCAT-user@lists.sourceforg
We've got a new xCAT MN running CentOS 7 and xCAT 2.11. It was running
happily for a while with a few nodes hanging off it.
Fast forward a few months upgrade to xCAT 2.12, and add a few more old
iDataPlex nodes, and node discovery/bmcsetup doesn't work. PXEboots fine,
but just never quite finis
Are you talking about the yum repos?
We use reposync to keep local copies of yum repos.
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Architect
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk // *t: * 0117 906 1104 // *m: * 07875 510891 //
*w: * www.cfms.org.uk <http://www.cfms.org.uk%22> // [image: Linkedin gre
Based on the shady behaviour from Sourceforge recently, it's probably worth
thinking of moving sooner rather than later!
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Architect
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk // *t: * 0117 906 1104 // *m: * 07875 510891 //
*w: * www.cfms.org.uk <http://www.cfms.o
(responding on Josh's behalf)
lsxcatd -v
Version 2.8.3 (built Tue Nov 12 23:16:15 EST 2013)
and we followed through the nextscale documentation (but applying to an
existing cluster, rather than new from scratch)
--
*Nathan Harper* // IT Systems Architect
*e: * nathan.har...@cfms.org.uk
/xcatpost/mypostscript either.
Regards,
Nathan
Nathan Harper
CFMS IT Systems Architect
07875510891
01179061104
On 08/15/2013 03:58 PM, Lissa Valletta wrote:
You will not see them listed
on the lsdef of the node. Only on the lsdef of the image.
That w
after reading that, I still wasn't
clear:
# lsdef -t osimage
postscripts=
but after
#nodeset n1 osimage=
#lsdef n1
postscripts=
Regards,
Nathan
Nathan Harper
CFMS IT Systems Architect
07875510891
011790
n1 osimage=
postscripts=
so xCAT isn't even trying to run the postscripts.
Regards,
Nathan
Nathan Harper
CFMS IT Systems Architect
07875510891
01179061104
On 08/15/2013 01:06 PM, Lissa Valletta wrote:
When you run nodeset do you
was previously
provisioned under the old method, the install works, but the postscripts
aren't applied, and its only picking up the xcatdefaults.
Is there something that I'm missing, some old bit of config which is
overriding it?
--
Regards,
Nathan
Nathan Harper
CFMS IT Syst
I am out of the office until 25/02/2013.
I am out of the office on a training course, and so wil have only sporadic
access to email.
In my absence, support at CFMS will be handled by Lawrence Cooper
(01179589114 or coope...@ie.ibm.com). For any general operational issues,
please contact ASRC O
I am out of the office until 04/12/2012.
I am out of the office on a training course, and so wil have only sporadic
access to email.
In my absence, support at the ASRC will be handled by my colleage David
Rajendra (01179589114 or qu...@uk.ibm.com). For any general operational
issues, please co
I am out of the office until 12/11/2012.
I will be out of the office, and will reply to any messages on my return.
In my absence, support at the ASRC will be handled by my colleage David
Rajendra (01179589114 or qu...@uk.ibm.com). For any general operational
issues, please contact ASRC Operati
I am out of the office until 24/09/2012.
In my absence, HPC support at the ASRC will be handled by my colleage Adam
Parker (01179589114 or park...@uk.ibm.com). For any general operational
issues, please contact ASRC Operations and Facilities Manager, Paul Edwards
(paul.edwa...@cfms.org.uk)
Not
I am out of the office until 12/06/2012.
In my absence, HPC support at the ASRC will be handled by my colleage
Lawrence Cooper (coope...@ie.ibm.com). For any general operational issues,
please contact ASRC Operations and Facilities Manager, Paul Edwards
(paul.edwa...@cfms.org.uk)
Note: This is
I am out of the office until 09/03/2012.
In my absence, HPC support at the ASRC will be handled by my colleage
Lawrence Cooper (coope...@ie.ibm.com). For any general operational issues,
please contact ASRC Operations and Facilities Manager, Paul Edwards
(paul.edwa...@cfms.org.uk)
Note: This is
I am out of the office until 06/12/2011.
I will be away from my computer for much of today, with limited email and
phone access. I will be checking my emails sporadically, and will reply
when I get an opportunity
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: [xcat-user]
Upgrade fro
38 matches
Mail list logo
