Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > Am Samstag, den 15.10.2005, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
> > > Dear Christian,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 21:18 +0200, Christian Neumair w
Am Sonntag, den 23.10.2005, 14:42 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > > Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > > > Am Samstag,
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 22:33 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > > Am Samstag, den 15.10.2005, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
> > > > Dear Chr
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:18 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> > Am Samstag, den 15.10.2005, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
> > > Dear Christian,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 21:18 +0200, Christian Neumair w
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 19:21 +0200 schrieb Lars Hallberg:
> Christian Neumair wrote:
>
> >a) Backwards compatibility. I know, we haven't reached 1.0 yet, and
> >don't make semantic guarantees but it's plain unfriendly to introduce
> >markup in a previously markup-free string which could be in
Christian Neumair wrote:
a) Backwards compatibility. I know, we haven't reached 1.0 yet, and
don't make semantic guarantees but it's plain unfriendly to introduce
markup in a previously markup-free string which could be interpreted
plain. GNOME 2.10 and 2.12 would display the abbr tag carbon, wh
Am Sonntag, den 16.10.2005, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Christian Neumair:
> Am Samstag, den 15.10.2005, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
> > Dear Christian,
> >
> > On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 21:18 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > I'm sorry but because of b) I really have to insist on the unexpa
Am Samstag, den 15.10.2005, 15:50 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
> Dear Christian,
>
> On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 21:18 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > I'm sorry but because of b) I really have to insist on the unexpanded
> > and the expanded version of a MIME description being two totally
> >
Dear Christian,
On Sat, 2005-10-15 at 21:18 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
[...]
> I have three problems with your proposal:
>
> a) Backwards compatibility. I know, we haven't reached 1.0 yet, and
> don't make semantic guarantees but it's plain unfriendly to introduce
> markup in a previously ma
On Do, 2005-10-13 at 11:44 -0400, Andrew J. Montalenti wrote:
> Dear Christian,
>
> On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:17 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > I don't know about this patch. Some of your long forms are a bit too
> > > long. "Cascading Style Sheets stylesheet" and "Microsoft Windows Media
On Do, 2005-10-13 at 06:23 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Christian Neumair wrote:
>
> > > I don't know about this patch. Some of your long forms are a bit too
> > > long. "Cascading Style Sheets stylesheet" and "Microsoft Windows Media
> > > Video video", for example, are
On 10/13/2005 3:17 AM, Christian Neumair wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2005, 23:48 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
>
>>I don't know about this patch. Some of your long forms are a bit too
>>long. "Cascading Style Sheets stylesheet" and "Microsoft Windows Media
>>Video video", for example, a
Martell, Larry wrote:
>What acronym can beat "TWAIN" - "Technology Without An Interesting Name"
There's the YACC compiler, which, when put that way, is a triple
redundancy. YACC stands for "Yet Another Compiler Compiler".
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
Dan Winship said the following on 10/13/2005 10:02 AM:
Steve
Kelem wrote:
I disagree. Tellling the reader what an
acronym means allows the reader to look it up, even if you don't
provide a pointer to where to get more info.
Googling for "CSS" gives "about 236,000,000" hits. Goo
Title: Re: [PATCH] Add long comments to shared-mime-info XML file
On Thu 10/13/2005 11:02 AM
Dan Winship wrote:
> Googling for "CSS" gives "about
236,000,000" hits. Googling for> "Cascading Style Sheets" gives "about
10,100,000" hits. The ac
Steve Kelem wrote:
I disagree. Tellling the reader what an acronym means allows the reader
to look it up, even if you don't provide a pointer to where to get more
info.
Googling for "CSS" gives "about 236,000,000" hits. Googling for
"Cascading Style Sheets" gives "about 10,100,000" hits. The
Dear Christian,
On Thu, 2005-10-13 at 12:17 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > I don't know about this patch. Some of your long forms are a bit too
> > long. "Cascading Style Sheets stylesheet" and "Microsoft Windows Media
> > Video video", for example, are particularly long and redundant, and
Dan Winship said the following on 10/13/2005 07:20 AM:
Christian Neumair wrote:
Maybe you could come up with alternate proposals?
Just kill off the acronym expansions completely. If the user doesn't
know what a CSS file is, telling them that it's a "Cascading Style
Sheet" is not really an
2005/10/13, Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Christian Neumair wrote:
> > Maybe you could come up with alternate proposals?
>
> Just kill off the acronym expansions completely. If the user doesn't
> know what a CSS file is, telling them that it's a "Cascading Style
> Sheet" is not really any more
On Thursday 13 October 2005 16:20, Dan Winship wrote:
> Christian Neumair wrote:
> > Maybe you could come up with alternate proposals?
>
> Just kill off the acronym expansions completely. If the user doesn't
> know what a CSS file is, telling them that it's a "Cascading Style
> Sheet" is not rea
Christian Neumair wrote:
Maybe you could come up with alternate proposals?
Just kill off the acronym expansions completely. If the user doesn't
know what a CSS file is, telling them that it's a "Cascading Style
Sheet" is not really any more informative than telling them that it's
called a "K
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > I don't know about this patch. Some of your long forms are a bit too
> > long. "Cascading Style Sheets stylesheet" and "Microsoft Windows Media
> > Video video", for example, are particularly long and redundant, and
> > would look stupid should a
Am Mittwoch, den 07.09.2005, 23:48 -0400 schrieb Andrew J. Montalenti:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:50 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> > @@ -461,7 +489,8 @@ command to generate the output files.
> >
> >
> >
> > -<_comment>active server page
> > +<_comment>ASP
> > +
Hey,
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 17:50 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
> @@ -461,7 +489,8 @@ command to generate the output files.
>
>
>
> -<_comment>active server page
> +<_comment>ASP
> +<_long-comment>Active Server Pagee
>
Seems to me that's a spelling error.
I don't
I finally had enough time to sit down and add long descriptions to the
shared-mime-info XML file, as announced under [1]. It's still not
complete, but at least some of the ugly strings were changed/shortened.
Hopefully sb. finds time to commit this, since my account is still not
renewed [2] and it
25 matches
Mail list logo