+1
- Original Message -
From: "Mathias Bogaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Aslak Hellesøy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 11:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Refactoring
> Ok, I have renamed the package na
+0
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mathias Bogaert
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:08 AM
> To: Aslak Hellesøy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] Refactoring
>
> Ok, I
quot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mathias Bogaert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 5:11 AM
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] Refactoring
> +1
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAI
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mathias
> Bogaert
> Sent: 28. april 2002 21:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Refactoring
>
>
> Hmm little proposition:
>
> Change
Hmm little proposition:
Change the package name of xdoclet.tags to xdoclet.taghandler ..
Why? All the rest of the packages are singular (ejb, jmx, loader,
tagsupport, util) and there are all taghandlers inside that package.
Mathias
___
Xdoclet-devel
t-gui
>
> stolen straight from the jboss setup...
>
> cheers
> dim
>
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Ara
> > > > Abrahamian
> >
---Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ara
> > > Abrahamian
> > > Sent: 22. mars 2002 13:45
> > > To: 'Vincent Harcq'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] r
back on the following release of
xjavadoc containing it.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ara
> > Abrahamian
> > Sent: 22. mars 2002 13:45
> > To: 'Vincent Harcq'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
t; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ara
> > Abrahamian
> > Sent: 22. mars 2002 13:45
> > To: 'Vincent Harcq'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
> >
> >
> > Imho it's
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ara
> Abrahamian
> Sent: 22. mars 2002 13:45
> To: 'Vincent Harcq'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
>
>
> Imho it's better to copy xjavadoc.jar to xdoclet/lib dir when building
> xjavadoc. It&#
t: Friday, March 22, 2002 10:39 AM
> To: 'Aslak Hellesoy'; 'Ara Abrahamian'; xdoclet-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
>
> > -But I know one thing: If xdoclet.jar is regenerated, xdoclet
> > doesn't regenerate sour
> -But I know one thing: If xdoclet.jar is regenerated, xdoclet
> doesn't regenerate sources as it used to do. We (you) should
> check xjavadoc.jar age too.
Yep, I'll do that.
BTW we should cvs add xjavadoc.jar to xdoclet/lib no ?
I am also thinking of adding Version info in the Manifest of the
> > > I am not sure samples can even deploy on any ejb server.
> > > Dmitri posted a message sometimes ago it was not deploying on Jboss.
> > > So a bad result does not mean ...
> >
> > Bad bad. Dim, what the problems are? We should definitely try to fix
> > samples and make them deployable. I kno
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ara
> Abrahamian
> Sent: 21. mars 2002 20:53
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
>
>
> > I am not sure samples can even dep
> I am not sure samples can even deploy on any ejb server.
> Dmitri posted a message sometimes ago it was not deploying on Jboss.
> So a bad result does not mean ...
Bad bad. Dim, what the problems are? We should definitely try to fix
samples and make them deployable. I know we were lazy to actua
> I'll try to deploy the samples on WLS and see if it chokes.
> If it doesn't, I guess we can merge back to main. Let's give
> it a few days and do it this week-end unless something bad turns up.
I am not sure samples can even deploy on any ejb server.
Dmitri posted a message sometimes ago it
D]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
>
> Every tests runs fine.
> In fact if you run them yourselves you will find some problems already
> solved on MAIN branch or to be solved (
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of Ara Abrahamian
> Sent: mardi 19 mars 2002 6:39
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
>
>
> So, now we should make sure the results are exactly the same.
> Run Vincent's tests
ows about some profiling tools/techniques we can use to
identify the bottlenecks better?
Aslak
- Original Message -
From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 6:38 am
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch
> So, now we should make sure the re
So, now we should make sure the results are exactly the same. Run
Vincent's tests on it and do some other comparisons/blabla. Next comes
some optimizations. The performance is not that great actually. There
should be a problem somewhere because webdoclet is lightening fast, also
utilobject/etc but
Nevermind I found a easy way to put it back ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
> Of Vincent Harcq
> Sent: dimanche 17 mars 2002 13:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Refactoring
>
>
Hi,
I wanted to try you finish xjavadoc integration.
The HOME is not correct due to getTagValue, ... That do not take
delimiter and tokenNumber atm.
Should I put that back or you want to kill that in favour of
forAllFinderMethod (for example) ?
Vincent
___
First, let me frustrate in public, cause I'm fucking pissed here. Netcom (my
Norwegian ISP, second biggest telecom company in Norway) let's me read my
webmail, but not answer any mails. I'm working in Stockholm/Sweden during
the week now, so I tried to sign up for a Swedish ISP account (at the
> at them from a code level (7 actually). I haven't written tests for
all
> cases, but the (strict) wls ejbc compiler seems to accept anything
XDoclet
> generates now. I'll definitely have tested this within a week (I have
to,
> cause I'm preparing a course using XDoclet at work), and I'll commit
On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Aslak Hellesoy wrote:
> As you can see from the commit messages, I have committed to the main branch
> (or did I miss something?).
(o: yes... I actually deleted the commit messages, and then wrote this
thinking that you had committed to main, but wasn't sure as I deleted th
eekend. Please wait till then.
>
> Aslak
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:25 pm
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch finished
>
> > hey all,
> >
> > as yo
> as you would have probably noticed by the commits, I've synced the
> refactoring branch down to main, so all development should now
continue on
> the main branch. afaik everything is in place, but if I've broken
> something, let me know...
No problems so far, great job.
> The docs need a litt
;
Date: Friday, October 26, 2001 1:25 pm
Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring branch finished
> hey all,
>
> as you would have probably noticed by the commits, I've synced the
> refactoring branch down to main, so all development should now
> continue on
> the main branch. afai
hey all,
as you would have probably noticed by the commits, I've synced the
refactoring branch down to main, so all development should now continue on
the main branch. afaik everything is in place, but if I've broken
something, let me know...
The docs need a little bit of work to bring them u
Refactoring is almost done. Everything should work as before, including
all web and ejb subtasks including weblogic/jboss/etc. So please put
some time on testing NAMESPACE_REFACTOR_BRANCH branch. This branch will
become the main branch in the coming days.
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From
nt: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 8:30 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring
> >
> > hey all,
> >
> > as you've probably seen from the commit messages, I've just committed
> a
> > whole bunch of stuff that Ara and I
October 17, 2001 8:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] refactoring
>
> hey all,
>
> as you've probably seen from the commit messages, I've just committed
a
> whole bunch of stuff that Ara and I have been working on for the past
few
> days. I
hey all,
as you've probably seen from the commit messages, I've just committed a
whole bunch of stuff that Ara and I have been working on for the past few
days. It is on a branch called NAMESPACE_REFACTOR_BRANCH and to check it
out you need to use:
# cvs -z9 co -r NAMESPACE_REFACTOR_BRANCH xdoc
h... oops, I'm guessing you're seeing my cvs logs coming through (o:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Cleaner but more verbose. Xdt +1
true, ok
> SubTask won't derive from TemplateEngine. Why should it? Will it use
> anything from template engine? No, everything is done in tagim
34 matches
Mail list logo
