Yes! Sure!
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dmitri Colebatch
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 11:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: [Xdoclet-d
7 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
>
> If Ara agrees (which I think he did, but I'm not 100% sure yet), I can
> update it. I already did the modifs locally.
>
> Aslak.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dmitri Colebatc
If Ara agrees (which I think he did, but I'm not 100% sure yet), I can
update it. I already did the modifs locally.
Aslak.
- Original Message -
From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:59 am
Subject: Re: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-n
ak
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:24 am
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
>
> > No. It's confusing for end-user to remember conditions.
> >
&g
Does this mean you're in favor of deprecating jndi-name and using local-
jndi-name and remote-jndi-name?
:aslak
- Original Message -
From: "Ara Abrahamian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:24 am
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
MAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
>
> How about this:
>
> local-jndi-name
> remote-jndi-name
> jndi-name
>
> the logic being that if local or remote are specified they apply, but
if
> they are absent _and_ view-type i
uld be deprecated, and we should go for
> "local-jndi-name" and "remote-jndi-name" only.
>
> This makes the jndi stuff less confusing in my opinion.
>
> Aslak.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
uot;remote-jndi-name" only.
This makes the jndi stuff less confusing in my opinion.
Aslak.
- Original Message -
From: Dmitri Colebatch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, September 27, 2001 0:14 am
Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
> How about this:
>
> lo
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:23 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
> >
> > The @ejb:bean tag has a parameter named "jndi-name". It seems to that
> > that both (remote) home and local home interfaces ar
Agree.
Ara.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] local-jndi-name
>
> The @ejb:
The @ejb:bean tag has a parameter named "jndi-name". It seems to that
that both (remote) home and local home interfaces are bound to the same
name. Shouldn't there be a different jndi name for each? At least WLS
wants different jndi names for each of the two homes.
I propose adding a new param
11 matches
Mail list logo
