Note that a cap is considered valid only if
it is within the [1, nr_vcpus]% interval.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
---
Cc: Wei Liu
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: George Dunlap
Cc: Anshul Makkar
---
tools/libxl/libxl_sched.c | 21 +
tools/xl/xl_cmdtable.c|1 +
tools/xl/xl_
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 02:09:09PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> Note that a cap is considered valid only if
> it is within the [1, nr_vcpus]% interval.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
Acked-by: Wei Liu
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.x
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> Note that a cap is considered valid only if
> it is within the [1, nr_vcpus]% interval.
Oh, I see you added the check here.
Still, I think we should add a check in the hypervisor too. The check
here should mainly be to give a reasonable er
On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 19:43 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Dario Faggioli
> wrote:
> > Note that a cap is considered valid only if
> > it is within the [1, nr_vcpus]% interval.
>
> Oh, I see you added the check here.
>
Yeah...
> Still, I think we should add a chec
