>>> On 20.03.17 at 14:10, wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:40:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 16.03.17 at 18:54, wrote:
>> > @@ -154,11 +155,11 @@ static void __init parse_dom0_nodes(const char *s)
>> > }
>> > custom_param("dom0_nodes", parse_dom0_nodes);
>> >
>> > -static cpumask
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:40:49AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 16.03.17 at 18:54, wrote:
> > @@ -154,11 +155,11 @@ static void __init parse_dom0_nodes(const char *s)
> > }
> > custom_param("dom0_nodes", parse_dom0_nodes);
> >
> > -static cpumask_t __initdata dom0_cpus;
> > +cpumask_t __
>>> On 16.03.17 at 18:54, wrote:
> @@ -154,11 +155,11 @@ static void __init parse_dom0_nodes(const char *s)
> }
> custom_param("dom0_nodes", parse_dom0_nodes);
>
> -static cpumask_t __initdata dom0_cpus;
> +cpumask_t __initdata dom0_cpus;
I'd prefer if this variable remained static, and I thi
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:15:45AM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/03/17 17:54, Wei Liu wrote:
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00..bb82c33a4c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
> > @@ -
On 16/03/17 17:54, Wei Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00..bb82c33a4c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/pv/dom0_build.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,910 @@
> +/***
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:15:01PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 16/03/17 18:12, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:54:56PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > [...]
> >> +/*
> >> + * PVH Fixme: XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel has been reused in PVH
> >> with a
> >> + * diff
On 16/03/17 18:12, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:54:56PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> [...]
>> +/*
>> + * PVH Fixme: XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel has been reused in PVH
>> with a
>> + * different meaning.
> Crap, I've forgot to remove this PVH fixme!
And
andrewcoop
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:54:56PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
[...]
> +/*
> + * PVH Fixme: XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel has been reused in PVH with
> a
> + * different meaning.
Crap, I've forgot to remove this PVH fixme!
[...]
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/dom0_build.h
> b/xen/inc
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:12:08PM +, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:54:56PM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> [...]
> > +/*
> > + * PVH Fixme: XENFEAT_supervisor_mode_kernel has been reused in PVH
> > with a
> > + * different meaning.
>
> Crap, I've forgot to remove th
Long term we want to be able to disentangle PV and HVM code. Move the PV
domain builder to a dedicated file.
This in turn requires exposing a few functions and variables via a new
header dom0_build.h. These functions and variables are now prefixed with
"dom0_" if they weren't already so.
No funct
10 matches
Mail list logo