Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-20 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 5:55 AM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 18/02/15 10:12, Juergen Gross wrote: >> On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: >>> On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build enlighten.c? It will never be

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-20 Thread David Vrabel
On 18/02/15 10:12, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: >> On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> >>> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build >>> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other >>> files in arch/x8

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:31:15PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:11:57PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Feb 1

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:11:57PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 18, 201

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:11:57PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > >> wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31:08AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 20

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:01:43PM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31:08AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > >> > On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, L

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:11 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31:08AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: >> > On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R.

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: >> >> On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: >>> >>> >>> If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build >>> enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several othe

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:31:08AM -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > > On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> As it is per our agreed upon change

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/18/2015 11:03 AM, David Vrabel wrote: On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other files in arch/x86/xen. Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-18 Thread David Vrabel
On 17/02/15 07:39, Juergen Gross wrote: > > If we have neither XEN_PV nor XEN_PVH set, why do we have to build > enlighten.c? It will never be used. Same should apply to several other > files in arch/x86/xen. Can we limit this series to only Kconfig changes? I don't really like scope-creep in pa

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-17 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > OK I'll keep xen_memory_setup() and its requirements then only if > XEN_PV is enabled but not XEN_PVH. As for the rest of enlighten.c and > friends -- this is just collateral. What files should we just need for > just XEN_PVHVM when XEN_

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-17 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:39 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/17/2015 01:20 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:07 AM, David Vrabel >> wrote: >>> >>> On 12/02/15 06:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Here's the first shot at the K

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-17 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 11:26 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> wrote: >>> >>> As it is per our agreed upon changes we can in theory enable a >>> XEN_PVHVM system without XEN_PV or XEN_PVH. If th

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-16 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/17/2015 01:20 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:07 AM, David Vrabel wrote: On 12/02/15 06:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Here's the first shot at the Kconfig changes for Xen as discussed on the mailing list a little while ago [0]. Let me kno

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-16 Thread Juergen Gross
On 02/17/2015 01:25 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: As it is per our agreed upon changes we can in theory enable a XEN_PVHVM system without XEN_PV or XEN_PVH. If this is indeed desirable this poses an issue at build time And this also rai

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > As it is per our agreed upon changes we can in theory enable a > XEN_PVHVM system without XEN_PV or XEN_PVH. If this is indeed > desirable this poses an issue at build time And this also raises the question of whether or not we should ma

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-16 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 3:07 AM, David Vrabel wrote: > On 12/02/15 06:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" >> >> Here's the first shot at the Kconfig changes for Xen as discussed >> on the mailing list a little while ago [0]. Let me know if you spot >> any issues or if you'd

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-12 Thread David Vrabel
On 12/02/15 06:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" > > Here's the first shot at the Kconfig changes for Xen as discussed > on the mailing list a little while ago [0]. Let me know if you spot > any issues or if you'd like things split differently. I tried to > make things as a

[Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] xen: kconfig changes

2015-02-11 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Here's the first shot at the Kconfig changes for Xen as discussed on the mailing list a little while ago [0]. Let me know if you spot any issues or if you'd like things split differently. I tried to make things as atomic as possible, but not being too rediculous on the a