On 01/08/2016 05:46 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 22:54 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
I had even more trouble, e.g. I wasn't able to use non-standard block
scripts (neither via /etc/xen/scripts/block-XXX nor via a script
parameter) which are mandatory for me.
>>>
On Thu, 2016-01-07 at 22:54 -0700, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> > > I had even more trouble, e.g. I wasn't able to use non-standard block
> > > scripts (neither via /etc/xen/scripts/block-XXX nor via a script
> > > parameter) which are mandatory for me.
> > Looking at the code it seems like this is still
On 01/04/2016 05:37 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 13:31 +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote:
>> Am 04.01.16 um 13:13 schrieb Ian Campbell:
>>> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 12:47 +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote:
Am 04.01.16 um 12:36 schrieb Ian Campbell:
> Sorry to hijack this thread.
>
On Thu, Jan 07, Jim Fehlig wrote:
> The 'iscsi:iqn.2006-09.de.suse@0ac47ee2-216e-452a-a341-a12624cd0225' blob was
> passed wholesale to xend, which would eat it and "do the right thing". AFAIK,
> libxl is not that forgiving. I've cc'd Olaf on this thread since we recently
> discussed how
On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 13:31 +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Am 04.01.16 um 13:13 schrieb Ian Campbell:
> > On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 12:47 +0100, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> > > Am 04.01.16 um 12:36 schrieb Ian Campbell:
> > > > Sorry to hijack this thread.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2015-12-28 at 12:56 +0100,
