flight 169169 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169169/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
flight 169163 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169163/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 169151
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 16 save
flight 169162 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169162/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 168502
Tests which did not suc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
> I'm afraid answering this requires debugging the issue. Yet you don't
> share any technical details (as to how things don't work, logs, and
> alike), and the provided link also doesn't look to point to any such
> information (and as an aside I cons
flight 169158 xen-4.14-testing real [real]
flight 169168 xen-4.14-testing real-retest [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169158/
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169168/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could
flight 169165 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169165/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
On 4/4/22 10:28, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:43:42PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:49 PM Stefano Stabellini
>>> wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 7:46 P
flight 169161 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169161/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
flight 169157 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169157/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 169145
Tests which did not
flight 169160 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169160/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm 1
From: Christoph Hellwig Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2022 10:06 PM
>
> Pass a bool to pass if swiotlb needs to be enabled based on the
Wording problems. I'm not sure what you meant to say.
> addressing needs and replace the verbose argument with a set of
> flags, including one to force enable bounce
On 4/4/22 11:12, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:21:18AM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> On 3/31/22 08:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:48PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic needs to make
>>>
(reducing Cc list some)
On 04.04.2022 16:49, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:44:10AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> GrUB2 can be told to leave the screen in the graphics mode it has been
>> using (or any other one), via "set gfxpayload=keep" (or suitable
>> variants thereof). In
On 3/31/22 09:16, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 3:05 PM Daniel P. Smith
> wrote:
>>
>> There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic needs to make
>> resource
>> allocation calls that are protected by XSM checks. The internal hypervisor
>> logic
>> is represented a num
On 04.04.2022 15:22, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:31:38AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Go a step further than bed9ae54df44 ("x86/time: switch platform timer
>> hooks to altcall") did and eliminate the "real" read_tsc() altogether:
>> It's not used except in pointer comparison
flight 169152 xen-4.15-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169152/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-livepatch13 livepatch-runfail REGR. vs. 168502
test-amd64-amd
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 03:43:42PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 3:49 PM Stefano Stabellini
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 7:46 PM Stefano Stabellini
> > > > wrote
On 04.04.2022 17:12, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:21:18AM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> On 3/31/22 08:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:48PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic needs to make
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:21:18AM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> On 3/31/22 08:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:48PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> >> There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic needs to make
> >> resource
> >> allocation calls that are p
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:51 AM Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> On 29.03.2022 16:03, Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
> > The fork's physmap should only be populated with select special pages during
> > the setup of the fork. The rest of the fork's physmap should only be
> > populated
> > as needed after the fork
On 3/31/22 08:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:49PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> It is now possible to promote the idle domain to privileged during setup. It
>> is not desirable for the idle domain to still be privileged when moving into
>> a
>> running state. If the
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:44:10AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> GrUB2 can be told to leave the screen in the graphics mode it has been
> using (or any other one), via "set gfxpayload=keep" (or suitable
> variants thereof). In this case we can avoid doing another mode switch
> ourselves. This in part
flight 169156 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169156/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 168254
build-amd64-xsm
On 3/31/22 08:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:48PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
>> There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic needs to make
>> resource
>> allocation calls that are protected by XSM checks. The internal hypervisor
>> logic
>> is represented
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 03:42:09PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.04.2022 15:46, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:16:00PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> All,
> >>
> >> while 4.14's general support period ended in January, we're considering
> >> to cut an out-of-ba
On 04/04/2022 13:45, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.04.2022 12:40, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> Prevent the assembler from creating a .note.gnu.property section on
>> the output objects, as it's not useful for firmware related binaries,
>> and breaks the resulting rombios image.
>>
>> This requires modify
On 01.04.2022 15:46, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 12:16:00PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> while 4.14's general support period ended in January, we're considering
>> to cut an out-of-band release due to the relatively large number of
>> security relevant bac
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> (This, as an aside, also makes pretty clear that - unlike the title
> of the series suggests - this has nothing to do with gcc 11.)
I've started debugging this as reported as an issue associated with
building with gcc 11, until I reali
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 9:34 AM Tamas K Lengyel wrote:
>
> During VM forking and resetting a failed vmentry has been observed due
> to the guest non-register state going out-of-sync with the guest register
> state. For example, a VM fork reset right after a STI instruction can trigger
> the failed
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:31:38AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Go a step further than bed9ae54df44 ("x86/time: switch platform timer
> hooks to altcall") did and eliminate the "real" read_tsc() altogether:
> It's not used except in pointer comparisons, and hence it looks overall
> more safe to simp
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:31:02AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> lib.h is imo a better fit for them than config.h.
Looks like most of what's in config.h could move to lib.h.
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné
Thanks, Roger.
On 04.04.2022 01:24, Mateusz wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm working on resolving a bug in Qubes OS. The problem is that
> when someone gives a VM too much RAM the GPU passthrough doesn't
> work as intended. I think it's because in these cases RAM overlaps
> with PCI addresses and memory relocation doesn't w
On 04.04.2022 12:40, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Prevent the assembler from creating a .note.gnu.property section on
> the output objects, as it's not useful for firmware related binaries,
> and breaks the resulting rombios image.
>
> This requires modifying the cc-option Makefile macro so it can tes
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 01:55:56PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 04.04.2022 13:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:29:44AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> +uint64_t __init calibrate_apic_timer(void)
> >> +{
> >> +uint32_t start, end;
> >> +uint64_t count = read_pt_and_
flight 169151 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169151/
Failures and problems with tests :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-credit2 broken
Tests which are fail
On 04.04.2022 10:08, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:52:46PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 31/03/2022 13:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:48PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic need
On 01.04.2022 14:02, George Dunlap wrote:
>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 3:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> Rename guest_physmap_add_entry() to p2m_add_page(); make
>> guest_physmap_remove_page() a trivial wrapper around p2m_remove_page().
>> This way callers can use suitable pairs of functions (previously
On 04.04.2022 13:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:29:44AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> +uint64_t __init calibrate_apic_timer(void)
>> +{
>> +uint32_t start, end;
>> +uint64_t count = read_pt_and_tmcct(&start), elapsed;
>> +uint64_t target = CALIBRATE_VALUE(plt_src
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:29:44AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Use the original calibration against PIT only when the platform timer
> is PIT. This implicitly excludes the "xen_guest" case from using the PIT
> logic (init_pit() fails there, and as of 5e73b2594c54 ["x86/time: minor
> adjustments to
On 31.03.2022 12:30, Penny Zheng wrote:
> Hi Jan
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Beulich
>> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 3:06 PM
>> To: Penny Zheng
>> Cc: Wei Chen ; Henry Wang ;
>> Andrew Cooper ; George Dunlap
>> ; Julien Grall ; Stefano Stabellini
>> ; Wei Liu ; xen-
>> de...@
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 12:12:54PM +0100, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Prevent the assembler from creating a .note.gnu.property section on
> > the output objects, as it's not useful for firmware related binaries,
> > and breaks the res
flight 169154 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169154/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777
build-i386-libvirt
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 12:40:44PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Prevent the assembler from creating a .note.gnu.property section on
> the output objects, as it's not useful for firmware related binaries,
> and breaks the resulting rombios image.
>
> This requires modifying the cc-option Makefil
> On 2 Apr 2022, at 00:14, Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>
> The EFI System Resource Table (ESRT) is necessary for fwupd to identify
> firmware updates to install. According to the UEFI specification §23.4,
> the table shall be stored in memory of type EfiBootServicesData.
> Therefore, Xen must
On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 12:40:43PM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Setting the fcf-protection=none option in EMBEDDED_EXTRA_CFLAGS in the
> Makefile doesn't get it propagated to the subdirectories, so instead
> set the flag in firmware/Rules.mk, like it's done for other compiler
> flags.
>
> Fixes
Prevent the assembler from creating a .note.gnu.property section on
the output objects, as it's not useful for firmware related binaries,
and breaks the resulting rombios image.
This requires modifying the cc-option Makefile macro so it can test
assembler options (by replacing the usage of the -S
Hello,
The following fixes some firmware build issues with gcc-11. Note that
dropping of .note.gnu.property section could likely be done in the
linker script in the hvmloader case, but rombios has no linker script
and such note is causing a non-working image. Other options could be
using objcopy t
Setting the fcf-protection=none option in EMBEDDED_EXTRA_CFLAGS in the
Makefile doesn't get it propagated to the subdirectories, so instead
set the flag in firmware/Rules.mk, like it's done for other compiler
flags.
Fixes: 3667f7f8f7 ('x86: Introduce support for CET-IBT')
Signed-off-by: Roger Pau
Hi,
On 3/18/22 23:28, David Laight wrote:
> From: Juergen Gross
>> Sent: 18 March 2022 16:56
>>
>> On 18.03.22 16:22, David Laight wrote:
>>> From: Juergen Gross
Sent: 18 March 2022 15:10
The dcdbas driver is used to call SMI handlers for both, dcdbas and
dell-smbios-smm. Both
Hello,
We have the following boxes pending commission:
italias
* Commission flight at:
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/169015/
* Issues:
All fine except for the leak-check errors:
LEAKED [process 14559 run-parts] process: root 14559 14558 0 19:29 ?
00:00
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 06:52:46PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31/03/2022 13:36, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 07:05:48PM -0400, Daniel P. Smith wrote:
> > > There are now instances where internal hypervisor logic needs to make
> > > resource
> > > allocation call
On 4/3/22 10:05 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> To shared more code between swiotlb and xen-swiotlb, offer a
> swiotlb_init_remap interface and add a remap callback to
> swiotlb_init_late that will allow Xen to remap the buffer the
> buffer without duplicating much of the logic.
>
> Signed-off-b
52 matches
Mail list logo
