Re: [PATCH] x86/irq: fix reporting of spurious i8259 interrupts

2023-08-28 Thread Jan Beulich
On 28.08.2023 12:14, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > The return value of bogus_8259A_irq() is wrong: the function will > return `true` when the IRQ is real and `false` when it's a spurious > IRQ. This causes the "No irq handler for vector ..." message in > do_IRQ() to be printed for spurious i8259 interr

[PATCH] x86/irq: fix reporting of spurious i8259 interrupts

2023-08-28 Thread Roger Pau Monne
The return value of bogus_8259A_irq() is wrong: the function will return `true` when the IRQ is real and `false` when it's a spurious IRQ. This causes the "No irq handler for vector ..." message in do_IRQ() to be printed for spurious i8259 interrupts which is not intended (and not helpful). Fix b