> From: Roger Pau Monne
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 11:08 AM
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Roger Pau Monne ; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> ; Ross Lagerwall
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: do not ignore sections with 0 size
>
> A side effect o
Ping?
There was some discussion on whether we need to handle such empty
sections, but I think we settled that it's necessary.
Thanks, Roger.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 12:08:53PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> A side effect of ignoring such sections is that symbols belonging to
> them won't be
On 17/03/2022 14:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 02:00:19PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 17/03/2022 11:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>>> A side effect of ignoring such sections is that symbols belonging to
>>> them won't be resolved, and that could make relocations belonging
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 02:00:19PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/03/2022 11:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > A side effect of ignoring such sections is that symbols belonging to
> > them won't be resolved, and that could make relocations belonging to
> > other sections that reference those
On 17.03.2022 15:00, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 17/03/2022 11:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
>> A side effect of ignoring such sections is that symbols belonging to
>> them won't be resolved, and that could make relocations belonging to
>> other sections that reference those symbols fail.
>>
>> For
On 17/03/2022 11:08, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> A side effect of ignoring such sections is that symbols belonging to
> them won't be resolved, and that could make relocations belonging to
> other sections that reference those symbols fail.
>
> For example it's likely to have an empty
A side effect of ignoring such sections is that symbols belonging to
them won't be resolved, and that could make relocations belonging to
other sections that reference those symbols fail.
For example it's likely to have an empty .altinstr_replacement with
symbols pointing to it, and marking the
