On 02/08/18 07:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 01.08.18 at 18:08, wrote:
>> On 01/08/18 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> Clearly we want to put a vCPU to sleep if it is _not_ already down.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>>> ---
>>> TBD: Since the flaw apparently never mattered, I imply that the
>>> On 01.08.18 at 18:08, wrote:
> On 01/08/18 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Clearly we want to put a vCPU to sleep if it is _not_ already down.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
>> ---
>> TBD: Since the flaw apparently never mattered, I imply that the function
>> is never called with any
On 01/08/18 16:36, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Clearly we want to put a vCPU to sleep if it is _not_ already down.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
> ---
> TBD: Since the flaw apparently never mattered, I imply that the function
> is never called with any vCPU up. Hence an alternative might be to
>
Clearly we want to put a vCPU to sleep if it is _not_ already down.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
---
TBD: Since the flaw apparently never mattered, I imply that the function
is never called with any vCPU up. Hence an alternative might be to
simply return an error if a vCPU doesn't have
