Re: [Xenomai] Fuse version in Xenomai-forge with --enabled-registry

2013-10-09 Thread K. De Mey
Hi, When I started adding the registry support for pSOS skin I first looked at the vxworks implementation. Then I implemented similar functionality in a similar manner for pSOS. So I make use of the registry code. These changes work fine. However when adding some more changes where I wanted to

Re: [Xenomai] Fuse version in Xenomai-forge with --enabled-registry

2013-10-09 Thread K. De Mey
Hi, It is indeed most likely not a specific Xenomai issue but probably something linker related. I found following two patches on the web: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2008-July/021864.html http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/13645/ The first one is kinda what I was already

Re: [Xenomai] [Announce] Xenomai 2.6.3

2013-10-09 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jeff Webb wrote: On 10/05/2013 01:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: at last, here comes Xenomai 2.6.3, available at the usual address: http://download.gna.org/xenomai/stable/xenomai-2.6.3.tar.bz2 In addition to core bug fixes and improvements, it has the following more visible changes: -

[Xenomai] Watchdog timer does not function correctly

2013-10-09 Thread ali hagigat
I have installed xenomai-2.6.2.1 for linux-3.5.7 under Fedora 13 correctly and the Xenomai tests like, latency, seem to work properly. I have written a application and have made it execute in the primary xenomai mode by rt_task_shadow and the timer mode is set in one shot=aperiodic. I have put

Re: [Xenomai] Watchdog timer does not function correctly

2013-10-09 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
ali hagigat wrote: I have installed xenomai-2.6.2.1 for linux-3.5.7 under Fedora 13 correctly and the Xenomai tests like, latency, seem to work properly. I have written a application and have made it execute in the primary xenomai mode by rt_task_shadow and the timer mode is set in one

Re: [Xenomai] [Announce] Xenomai 2.6.3

2013-10-09 Thread Jeff Webb
On 10/09/2013 05:04 AM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jeff Webb wrote: On 10/05/2013 01:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: at last, here comes Xenomai 2.6.3, available at the usual address: http://download.gna.org/xenomai/stable/xenomai-2.6.3.tar.bz2 In addition to core bug fixes and

[Xenomai] Latency peaks without IPIPE_DEBUG_INTERNAL

2013-10-09 Thread Petr Cervenka
/attachments/20131009/83323974/attachment.obj ___ Xenomai mailing list Xenomai@xenomai.org http://www.xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai

Re: [Xenomai] Fuse version in Xenomai-forge with --enabled-registry

2013-10-09 Thread K. De Mey
Okay, a bit more information regarding the problem we had for those that might also run into it... Apparently the issue was posted a while ago on the Fuse mailing list. The discussion explains the problem: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26335934 A bug was filed at glibc:

[Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-09 Thread Daniel Merrill
All, I'm hoping maybe someone can shed a little more light on the issue we see occasionally. Occasionally our code using the psos+ skin will fail a t_suspend(0) with error code -4, which I found to be EINTR and appears to be set if the XNBREAK flag is set. After digging around in the

Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-09 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 10/09/2013 06:29 PM, Daniel Merrill wrote: All, I'm hoping maybe someone can shed a little more light on the issue we see occasionally. Occasionally our code using the psos+ skin will fail a t_suspend(0) with error code -4, which I found to be EINTR and appears to be set if the XNBREAK

Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-09 Thread Daniel Merrill
On 10/09/2013 06:29 PM, Daniel Merrill wrote: All, I'm hoping maybe someone can shed a little more light on the issue we see occasionally. Occasionally our code using the psos+ skin will fail a t_suspend(0) with error code -4, which I found to be EINTR and appears to be set if the

Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-09 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 10/09/2013 06:37 PM, Daniel Merrill wrote: On 10/09/2013 06:29 PM, Daniel Merrill wrote: All, I'm hoping maybe someone can shed a little more light on the issue we see occasionally. Occasionally our code using the psos+ skin will fail a t_suspend(0) with error code -4, which I found to be

Re: [Xenomai] t_suspend and XNBREAK

2013-10-09 Thread Daniel Merrill
On 10/09/2013 06:37 PM, Daniel Merrill wrote: On 10/09/2013 06:29 PM, Daniel Merrill wrote: All, I'm hoping maybe someone can shed a little more light on the issue we see occasionally. Occasionally our code using the psos+ skin will fail a t_suspend(0) with error code -4, which I found

Re: [Xenomai] Latency peaks without IPIPE_DEBUG_INTERNAL

2013-10-09 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
On 10/09/2013 03:46 PM, Petr Cervenka wrote: Hello everyone. I have very high latency peaks (~400us) with my configuration when IPIPE_DEBUG and IPIPE_DEBUG_INTERNAL are !NOT! switched on. Way to reproduce the issue is to run the latency test (tried with high priority): $ sudo