-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-02-28 16:02, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 02/28/2014 01:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
>> With Xenomai-3, will it be possible to use the native RTDM an a
>> vanilla kernel, or only on PREEMPT_RT kernels?
>
> Any kernel will do, provided it fits t
On 02/28/2014 03:35 PM, Kim De Mey wrote:
2014-02-28 15:02 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
On 02/28/2014 02:30 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/26/2014 09:54 AM, Kim De Mey wrote:
2014-02-10 12:23 GMT+01:00 Kim De Mey :
2014-02-09 17:57 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
On 02/06/2014 02:36 PM, Kim De Mey
On 02/28/2014 01:03 PM, Anders Blomdell wrote:
With Xenomai-3, will it be possible to use the native RTDM an a vanilla kernel,
or
only on PREEMPT_RT kernels?
Any kernel will do, provided it fits the user requirements in terms of
response and execution time. PREEMPT_RT is not a pre-requisite f
2014-02-28 15:02 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
> On 02/28/2014 02:30 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>> On 02/26/2014 09:54 AM, Kim De Mey wrote:
>>> 2014-02-10 12:23 GMT+01:00 Kim De Mey :
2014-02-09 17:57 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
> On 02/06/2014 02:36 PM, Kim De Mey wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
On 02/28/2014 02:30 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 02/26/2014 09:54 AM, Kim De Mey wrote:
>> 2014-02-10 12:23 GMT+01:00 Kim De Mey :
>>> 2014-02-09 17:57 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
On 02/06/2014 02:36 PM, Kim De Mey wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe there is a problem in Xenomai-for
On 02/26/2014 09:54 AM, Kim De Mey wrote:
2014-02-10 12:23 GMT+01:00 Kim De Mey :
2014-02-09 17:57 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
On 02/06/2014 02:36 PM, Kim De Mey wrote:
Hi,
I believe there is a problem in Xenomai-forge when doing a pSOS
t_suspend() call right after a t_start() call.
It looks
2014-02-27 16:59 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
> On 02/27/2014 12:54 PM, Kim De Mey wrote:
>>
>> 2014-02-27 11:50 GMT+01:00 Philippe Gerum :
>>>
>>> On 02/27/2014 10:50 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/27/2014 08:36 AM, Kim De Mey wrote:
>
>
> 2014-02-26 10:26 GMT+01:00 Phili
With Xenomai-3, will it be possible to use the native RTDM an a vanilla kernel,
or
only on PREEMPT_RT kernels? The reason that I ask, is that I need to upgrade the
software in our labs (vanilla kernels, mostly) and would like to get comedi
(www.comedi.org) to work with RTDM (so I get all the driv
On 02/27/2014 09:33 PM, Gregory Dymarek wrote:
> Not sure if I understand this. This is the first call to __report_bad_irq (
> https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/blob/rpi-3.8.y/kernel/irq/spurious.c )
>
> I added the trace on line 192.
>
> AFAIK this is the first call to the function. the trace
On 02/28/2014 02:12 AM, Paul wrote:
> On Thursday 27 February 2014, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> I am looking at the "post" patch for Raspberry, and I do not see that
>> it touches drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2835.c
>>
>> Here the calls to handle_IRQ are not replaced with ipipe calls, this
>> can not
On 02/28/2014 12:30 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/28/2014 12:11 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/28/2014 12:09 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/28/2014 09:44 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/27/2014 08:49 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/27/2014 04:54 PM, git repository hostin
On 02/28/2014 12:11 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 02/28/2014 12:09 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 02/28/2014 09:44 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 02/27/2014 08:49 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/27/2014 04:54 PM, git repository hosting wrote:
> memset(&sa, 0, size
On 02/14/2014 06:08 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-02-14 17:28, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/14/2014 04:52 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2014-02-14 15:08, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/14/2014 02:35 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
I started to read through your patches. The general direction remains
valid
On 02/28/2014 12:09 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/28/2014 09:44 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 02/27/2014 08:49 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/27/2014 04:54 PM, git repository hosting wrote:
memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
sigaction(SIG
On 02/28/2014 09:44 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 08:49 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 02/27/2014 04:54 PM, git repository hosting wrote:
>>> memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
>>> sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
>>> sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, NULL);
>>
>> Why not masking the signal h
On 02/27/2014 08:49 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 02/27/2014 04:54 PM, git repository hosting wrote:
memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, NULL);
Why not masking the signal here instead of ignoring it? So that the
notification
16 matches
Mail list logo
