On 05/31/2016 04:09 PM, Wolfgang Netbal wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> we have moved our application from "XENOMAI 2.6.2.1 + Linux 3.0.43" to
> "XENOMAI 2.6.4. + Linux 3.10.53". Our target is an i.MX6DL. The system
> is now up and running and works stable. Unfortunately we see a
> difference in the
Dear all,
we have moved our application from "XENOMAI 2.6.2.1 + Linux 3.0.43" to
"XENOMAI 2.6.4. + Linux 3.10.53". Our target is an i.MX6DL. The system
is now up and running and works stable. Unfortunately we see a
difference in the performance. Our old combination (XENOMAI 2.6.2.1 +
Linux
Am 2016-05-25 12:11, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix:
Basically what you showed here does not show what particular dts
your device uses, since all the dtbs are copied. So, no, you do not
know yet if the dtb your device actually loads contains the
declaration of the global timer.
You were right.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:32:16PM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:06:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2016-05-30 17:20, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:39:42PM +0200, git repository hosting wrote:
> > >> Module: xenomai-jki
> > >>
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 01:06:23PM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2016-05-30 17:20, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:39:42PM +0200, git repository hosting wrote:
> >> Module: xenomai-jki
> >> Branch: for-forge
> >> Commit: ec9a8c81944d4a3e3f50af314fa58ade68dd28c2
> >> URL:
On 2016-05-30 17:20, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 04:39:42PM +0200, git repository hosting wrote:
>> Module: xenomai-jki
>> Branch: for-forge
>> Commit: ec9a8c81944d4a3e3f50af314fa58ade68dd28c2
>> URL:
>>
