Re: What' the meaning of snapshot-driven Which is seen in the comments of the code of xenomai-v3.1.

2020-04-20 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
[please avoid posting some messages twice] On 21.04.20 07:40, 孙世龙 via Xenomai wrote: Hi, What' the meaning of snapshot-driven Which is seen in the comments of the code of xenomai-v3.1. For your convenice, I list the related code below. Very few useful information could be aquired

What' the meaning of snapshot-driven Which is seen in the comments of the code of xenomai-v3.1.

2020-04-20 Thread 孙世龙 via Xenomai
Hi, What' the meaning of snapshot-driven Which is seen in the comments of the code of xenomai-v3.1. For your convenice, I list the related code below. Very few useful information could be aquired through the search engines. I have seen many function names which contain the

[no subject]

2020-04-20 Thread 孙世龙 via Xenomai
Hi, What' the meaning of snapshot-driven Which is seen in the comments of the code of xenomai-v3.1. For your convenice, I list the related code below. Very few useful information could be aquired through the search engines. I have seen many function names which contain the

Re: FAILURE run_gdb:287: checking expression "primary_mode", expected "$", found "N"

2020-04-20 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 21.04.20 04:43, Vitaly Chikunov via Xenomai wrote: Jan, On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:27:29AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov via Xenomai wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 01:18:50AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov via Xenomai wrote: I try ipipe-core-4.19.114-cip24-x86-12 + xenomai-3.1 patches. But how to

Re: FAILURE run_gdb:287: checking expression "primary_mode", expected "$", found "N"

2020-04-20 Thread Vitaly Chikunov via Xenomai
Jan, On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 01:18:50AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov via Xenomai wrote: > > I try ipipe-core-4.19.114-cip24-x86-12 + xenomai-3.1 patches. > But how to interpret this test result? > > 4.19.114-xenomai-alt1.cip24.12:~# xeno-test -k > Started child 6707: /bin/bash

FAILURE run_gdb:287: checking expression "primary_mode", expected "$", found "N"

2020-04-20 Thread Vitaly Chikunov via Xenomai
Hello, I try ipipe-core-4.19.114-cip24-x86-12 + xenomai-3.1 patches. But how to interpret this test result? 4.19.114-xenomai-alt1.cip24.12:~# xeno-test -k Started child 6707: /bin/bash /usr/lib/xenomai/xeno-test-run-wrapper /usr/bin/xeno-test -k ++ echo 0 ++ testdir=/usr/lib/xenomai

Re: [PATCH v2] cobalt: allow to compile without __USE_LARGEFILE64

2020-04-20 Thread Jan Kiszka via Xenomai
On 20.04.20 13:21, Norbert Lange wrote: Well, I dont think 1-2 lines of a preprocessor checks count as some kind of intellectual work. I wouldn't think that way if I take some pretty much known math formula from wikipedia. This is just a convenience topic for the maintainer. In fact, he

Re: [PATCH v2] cobalt: allow to compile without __USE_LARGEFILE64

2020-04-20 Thread Norbert Lange via Xenomai
Well, I dont think 1-2 lines of a preprocessor checks count as some kind of intellectual work. I wouldn't think that way if I take some pretty much known math formula from wikipedia. Norbert Am So., 19. Apr. 2020 um 11:22 Uhr schrieb Jan Kiszka : > > On 17.04.20 10:35, Norbert Lange via Xenomai

RE: Regarding Xenomai patch installation on Live USB

2020-04-20 Thread Meng, Fino via Xenomai
> >Thank you for your email response Fino. > >Maybe due to 4.9.* is too far away from Ubuntu 1804's original kernel; What >will be the issue in this case? Due to any hardware >driver dependency causing this issue? > >We make this repo for convenience, Kernel version is 4.19.59 with some Intel

Re: Regarding Xenomai patch installation on Live USB

2020-04-20 Thread gopi ratnakaram via Xenomai
Thank you for your email response Fino. Maybe due to 4.9.* is too far away from Ubuntu 1804's original kernel; *What will be the issue in this case? Due to any hardware driver dependency causing this issue?* We make this repo for convenience, Kernel version is 4.19.59 with some Intel BSP