On 29.07.21 13:29, Florian Bezdeka wrote:
> The mutex of the smokey_barrier used inside protect_handover() was
> never destroyed. This had side effects when trying to extend the test
> suite with an additional function that had a mutex located on the same
> address than the never cleaned up
The mutex of the smokey_barrier used inside protect_handover() was
never destroyed. This had side effects when trying to extend the test
suite with an additional function that had a mutex located on the same
address than the never cleaned up smokey_barrier lock.
Signed-off-by: Florian Bezdeka
