Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
The bug submission form is here:
https://gna.org/bugs/?func=additemgroup=xenomai
I just had a look at its configuration, here is how it could be
configured
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes information to
scatter in contrast to the ml. There'll be bug
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes
information to scatter in contrast to the ml. There'll be bug
reports on the ml regardless of having or not having a bug
tracking system in function. It's more difficult to
follow/search two places than one. And this project isn't the
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
I'm not stronly opposing, but in my opinion it causes information to
scatter in
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Hi,
GNA offers a bug tracking system which is undoubtely a useful tool
for lots of projects. What about using it for the Xenomai project ?
It's more difficult to follow/search two places
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
There's the if. What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
although the tracker can probably be configured to forward reports to
ml, or? Who will type the ml-only reports to the
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti:
Heikki Lindholm wrote:
There's the if. What I've seen on sourceforge is that often times bugs
that are reported on the ml don't appear in the tracker and vice versa,
although the tracker can probably be configured to forward reports to
ml, or? Who will
Hello,
I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of
fusion into xenomai project.
TIA
Marco Cavallini
=
Koan s.a.s. - Software Engineering
Linux and WinCE solutions for Embedded and Real-Time Software
Klinux : the
Marco Cavallini wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of
fusion into xenomai project.
Unless I don't misunderstand your question: Xenomai _is_ fusion. Take a
look at the code base, the main difference between fusion-0.9.1 and
current Xenomai SVN is
Marco Cavallini wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to know (if is possible) the future plans and task schedule of
fusion into xenomai project.
TIA
There are things already going on under the surface right now, and others that
would depend on everyone's input in order to start them or not. The roadmap
On 10/12/2005 04:39 PM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
We have linux-2.4.14-rc3 running on all AMCC eval boards (see
http://www.denx.de). But the kernel supported by RTAI/Fusion,
linuxppc-2.6.10rc3, does not boot on Ebony. The main problem is the
missing support for U-Boot
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
[...]
- New skins: Any new colors for the chameleon?
Perfect POSIX is, to me, more important than new skins. Perfect means,
among other things, that the interference
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/12/2005 04:39 PM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
We have linux-2.4.14-rc3 running on all AMCC eval boards (see
http://www.denx.de). But the kernel supported by RTAI/Fusion,
linuxppc-2.6.10rc3, does not boot on Ebony. The main problem is the
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
[...]
- New skins: Any new colors for the chameleon?
Perfect POSIX is, to me, more important than new skins. Perfect
means,
among other things,
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
[...]
- New skins: Any new colors for the chameleon?
Perfect POSIX is, to me, more important than new
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
[...]
- Drivers: Now that we have a deeply integrated port of RTDM, what's
next? Field busses and other industrial gizmos anyone?
That's an interesting avenue for all our machine control oriented realtime
applications.
On 10/13/2005 11:11 AM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/12/2005 04:39 PM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
We have linux-2.4.14-rc3 running on all AMCC eval boards (see
http://www.denx.de). But the kernel supported by RTAI/Fusion,
linuxppc-2.6.10rc3, does
Hi Philippe
On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote:
- Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how
stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by
arch?
Have a couple of x86 development boxes running 24/7 - Could set one
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/13/2005 11:11 AM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 10/12/2005 04:39 PM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
We have linux-2.4.14-rc3 running on all AMCC eval boards (see
http://www.denx.de). But the kernel supported by
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Philippe Gerum wrote:
[...]
- New skins: Any new colors for the chameleon?
Perfect POSIX
Hello all,
My name is Sean McGranaghan, I am a software engineer working in
Rochester, NY. USA. I have recently been tasked with porting a standard
Linux driver to the RTAI/fusion environment. I have RTAI/fusion 0.8.3 up
and running with a 2.6.13 kernel. I have a couple general questions,
On 10/13/2005 03:33 PM Philippe Gerum wrote:
Paul wrote:
Hi Philippe
On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote:
- Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how
stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by
arch?
Have a
Herman Bruyninckx wrote:
The question is: how is the following problem solved? Where the problem is
as follows: using Posix threads in realtime requires another library than
the standard NPTL library that Linux uses (at least, I think you require
another library), but how do you make sure
Paul wrote:
Hi Philippe
On Thursday 13 October 2005 09:24, Philippe Gerum wrote:
- Regular automated benchmarking: What is Xenomai currently capable of, how
stable is it, do we progress or regress over time and releases, arch by
arch?
Have a couple of x86 development boxes
24 matches
Mail list logo
