Re: [Xenomai-core] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/xenomai/skins/posix/syscall.c:272

2006-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hello, when I start the RT-Socket-CAN program rtcan_rtt.c, I get the attached error message. Any idea where the problem could be? It was working with Xenomai under Linux 2.4.25. Thanks. Wolfgang. -

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/3] Reworked nucleus statistics

2006-10-19 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 18/10/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (1) time spent in ISR;>> (2) some prologue for the very first shared handler and epilogue - for the> last one.(2) is the rare case that multiple IRQs happen at the same time on the same line. As I said, the case when only one occurs and the othe

[Xenomai-core] Re: Terminology and versions

2006-10-19 Thread Saverio Labozzetta
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 06:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm looking for help with a lot of terminology and version numbering which > I don't understand. The following is a summary of my knowledge about RTAI, > Fusion, Xenomai, ADEOS terms. > > There was two lines of development

Re: [Xenomai-core] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/xenomai/skins/posix/syscall.c:272

2006-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hello, when I start the RT-Socket-CAN program rtcan_rtt.c, I get the attached error message. Any idea where the problem could be? It was working with Xenomai under Linux 2.4.25. Thanks. Wolfgang. -

Re: [Xenomai-core] kernel panic

2006-10-19 Thread Wael BACHTA
Hi, Thank you for your hints. I patched my kernel the new adeos patch (adeos-ipipe-2.6.17-i386-1.5-00.patch). and I did this tests : - SMP on and PCI_MSI on : my PC boots. I installed xenomai 2.2.0. I can see my 2 virtual processors with "cat /proc/cpuinfo" BUT, I don't have interrupts. - SMP o

[Xenomai-core] [BUG?] delayed PIC timer event

2006-10-19 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, while actually cross-checking some user's problem with RTnet (not on Xenomai), I happen to stumble over another weirdness. Scenario: RTnet under high load (>5 KHz network IRQ rate, large packets), "latency -p1000" as additional load, Pentium 266 MHz (tried boards from different vendors), kern

Re: [Xenomai-core] kernel panic

2006-10-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:48 +, Wael BACHTA wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for your hints. > > I patched my kernel the new adeos patch > (adeos-ipipe-2.6.17-i386-1.5-00.patch). and I did this tests : > > - SMP on and PCI_MSI on : my PC boots. I installed xenomai 2.2.0. I can see > my 2 virtual pr

Re: [Xenomai-core] kernel panic

2006-10-19 Thread Wael BACHTA
I did the following tests : - patch 1.5, SMP on, PCI_MSI on, xenomai off : the /proc/interrupts is the following : CPU0 CPU1 0: 74130 0IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 67 0IO-APIC-edge i8042 7: 0 0IO-APIC-edge parport0 8

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] fixing __xn_put_user and __xn_get_user for PowerPC

2006-10-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Hello, the attached patch fixes the problem described in the mail https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2006-10/msg00037.html. Here is the ChangeLog entry: * include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h, include/asm-powerpc/syscall.h: Since Linux 2.4.15, __put_user and __get_user call migth_

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/3] Reworked nucleus statistics

2006-10-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 22:06 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > > ... > > Dmitry, are there other issues I'm missing, that you think > would be > better solved using a simpler accounting model? > > So according to you, the more complex model gives users a bet

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] fixing __xn_put_user and __xn_get_user for PowerPC

2006-10-19 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:25 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hello, > > the attached patch fixes the problem described in the mail > https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2006-10/msg00037.html. Here is > the ChangeLog entry: > >* include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h, include/asm-powerpc