Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
when I start the RT-Socket-CAN program rtcan_rtt.c, I get the attached
error message. Any idea where the problem could be? It was working with
Xenomai under Linux 2.4.25.
Thanks.
Wolfgang.
-
On 18/10/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (1) time spent in ISR;>> (2) some prologue for the very first shared handler and epilogue - for the> last one.(2) is the rare case that multiple IRQs happen at the same time on the
same line. As I said, the case when only one occurs and the othe
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 06:02 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm looking for help with a lot of terminology and version numbering which
> I don't understand. The following is a summary of my knowledge about RTAI,
> Fusion, Xenomai, ADEOS terms.
>
> There was two lines of development
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
when I start the RT-Socket-CAN program rtcan_rtt.c, I get the attached
error message. Any idea where the problem could be? It was working with
Xenomai under Linux 2.4.25.
Thanks.
Wolfgang.
-
Hi,
Thank you for your hints.
I patched my kernel the new adeos patch
(adeos-ipipe-2.6.17-i386-1.5-00.patch). and I did this tests :
- SMP on and PCI_MSI on : my PC boots. I installed xenomai 2.2.0. I can see
my 2 virtual processors with "cat /proc/cpuinfo" BUT, I don't have
interrupts.
- SMP o
Hi,
while actually cross-checking some user's problem with RTnet (not on
Xenomai), I happen to stumble over another weirdness. Scenario:
RTnet under high load (>5 KHz network IRQ rate, large packets), "latency
-p1000" as additional load, Pentium 266 MHz (tried boards from different
vendors), kern
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:48 +, Wael BACHTA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your hints.
>
> I patched my kernel the new adeos patch
> (adeos-ipipe-2.6.17-i386-1.5-00.patch). and I did this tests :
>
> - SMP on and PCI_MSI on : my PC boots. I installed xenomai 2.2.0. I can see
> my 2 virtual pr
I did the following tests :
- patch 1.5, SMP on, PCI_MSI on, xenomai off : the /proc/interrupts is the
following :
CPU0 CPU1
0: 74130 0IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 67 0IO-APIC-edge i8042
7: 0 0IO-APIC-edge parport0
8
Hello,
the attached patch fixes the problem described in the mail
https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2006-10/msg00037.html. Here is
the ChangeLog entry:
* include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h, include/asm-powerpc/syscall.h:
Since Linux 2.4.15, __put_user and __get_user call migth_
On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 22:06 +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Dmitry, are there other issues I'm missing, that you think
> would be
> better solved using a simpler accounting model?
>
> So according to you, the more complex model gives users a bet
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:25 +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the attached patch fixes the problem described in the mail
> https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2006-10/msg00037.html. Here is
> the ChangeLog entry:
>
>* include/asm-powerpc/wrappers.h, include/asm-powerpc
11 matches
Mail list logo