Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
by Philippe. I recently had the chance to test it and hack a bit on the
SMP IO-APIC part.
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
by Philippe. I
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anyway, there is an unreleased work-in-progress patch for x86 over -rc6
by
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 18:37 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Anyway,
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 18:37 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 10:36 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 23:46 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 14:19 +0100, Jan Kiszka
Ok, I ended up finding such decoupling cleaner, given that we don't drag
the full debug overhead when activating /proc/xenomai/locks in SMP mode,
thanks to the reorganized debug options. Gilles, is this patch series ok
for you too, and particularly the POSIX changes?
--
Philippe.
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 18:59 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...Resuming the discussion on both interested lists...]
Rough idea from my side on a potential organisation of the git trees:
o A generic I-pipe core tree that primarily targets git head (i.e. 2.6)
o One branch for git head, pulls both
