Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 13:11:23 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 12:21:25 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I hack a bit my patch to make it compile and the kernel already booted.
Though it
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
new genirq interface, in contrast to the powerpc tree (that's what you
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
new genirq interface, in contrast to the powerpc
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:09:38 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, generic applies only to the Linux part. I realized,
that the new IPIPE support for the genirqs requires even more
arch-specific modifications than the old interface :-( on PowerPC.
That's pretty
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:17:07 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have now a preliminary patch for adeos-ipipe-2.6.19-ppc-1.5-00. The
porting was rather straight-forward, as the ppc tree does not use the
new genirq interface,
Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:39 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
we just had some fun here with incompatible native libraries. A program
was built against some 2.2 release and was then started on a target with
2.3 libs installed. The result: undefined symbol rt_mutex_lock. The
Benjamin Zores wrote:
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:09:38 +0100
Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, generic applies only to the Linux part. I realized,
that the new IPIPE support for the genirqs requires even more
arch-specific modifications than the old interface :-( on
