Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 28.10.2010 21:34, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 21:15 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles, I happened to come across rthal_mark_irq_disabled/enabled on arm. On first glance, it looks like these helpers manipulate irq_desc::status non-atomically, i.e.

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 28.10.2010 21:34, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 21:15 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles, I happened to come across rthal_mark_irq_disabled/enabled on arm. On first glance, it looks like

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 29.10.2010 10:27, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 28.10.2010 21:34, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 21:15 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles, I happened to come across rthal_mark_irq_disabled/enabled on

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:05 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 10:27, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 28.10.2010 21:34, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 21:15 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles, I

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 29.10.2010 14:00, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:05 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 10:27, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 28.10.2010 21:34, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 21:15 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 14:00, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:05 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 10:27, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 28.10.2010 21:34, Philippe Gerum wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:46 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 14:00, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:05 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 10:27, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:00 +0200,

Re: [Xenomai-core] arm: Unprotected access to irq_desc field?

2010-10-29 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 29.10.2010 14:58, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:46 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 14:09 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 14:00, Philippe Gerum wrote: On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 11:05 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 10:27, Philippe Gerum wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Potential problem with rt_eepro100

2010-10-29 Thread Jan Kiszka
Am 29.10.2010 19:42, Anders Blomdell wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Please provide the full kernel log, ideally also with the I-pipe tracer (with panic tracing) enabled. Will reconfigure/recompile and do that, with full kernel log do you mean all bootup info? That's best to avoid missing some

Re: [Xenomai-core] Potential problem with rt_eepro100

2010-10-29 Thread Anders Blomdell
On 2010-10-29 20.06, Jan Kiszka wrote: Am 29.10.2010 19:42, Anders Blomdell wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Please provide the full kernel log, ideally also with the I-pipe tracer (with panic tracing) enabled. Will reconfigure/recompile and do that, with full kernel log do you mean all bootup