Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: update debian/cont rol for debian 6.0 "squeeze"

2011-01-03 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am Montag 03 Januar 2011, 21:22:44 schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > patch attached for upcoming debian 6.0 "squeeze". > > Does not it create an artificial limitation? I mean, does not it prevent > us from building

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: update debian/control for debian 6.0 "squeeze"

2011-01-03 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, patch attached for upcoming debian 6.0 "squeeze". Stefan From 505640995eac8b64b53a9fab476c9f91203be6ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 14:07:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] debian: update debian/control for debian 6.0 "squeeze"

Re: [Xenomai-core] [announce] Xenomai v2.5.5

2010-10-11 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am Sonntag 10 Oktober 2010, 23:09:19 schrieben Sie: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Anyway, I will add it, but I will wait a bit to re-generate a 2.5.5.1 in > > order to see if we have no other issue. > > Ok. No other issues, I uploaded 2.5.5.1. Thank you. Stefan __

Re: [Xenomai-core] [announce] Xenomai v2.5.5

2010-10-06 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
On 06.10.2010 16:24, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: > >> Hi Gilles, >> >> On 06.10.2010 14:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> - the debian patch generation script, which caused invalid patche

Re: [Xenomai-core] [announce] Xenomai v2.5.5

2010-10-06 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi Gilles, On 06.10.2010 14:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > [...] > - the debian patch generation script, which caused invalid patches to be > generated for recent kernel releases > The file scripts/prepare-patch.sh is missing in the xenomai-2.5.5.tar.bz2 archive. Stefan signature.asc D

Re: [Xenomai-core] [git pull] small RTDM fixes and assorted patches

2010-08-20 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi Jan, https://mail.gna.org/public/xenomai-core/2010-05/msg00059.html Stefan Am 20.08.2010 17:02, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > The following changes since commit 7e2735614ebe515d57abeaa3ff6df375a7c4149f: > > sched: avoid infinite reschedule loops (2010-08-03 00:11:21 +0200) > > are available in th

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: fix init script start/stop values

2010-06-14 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
-Stop values (none) Stefan From 1ac2238e2f8edb5912c9d02ec508a464add14d16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 16:14:50 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] debian: fix init script start/stop values --- debian/libxenomai1.xenomai.init |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] RTDM device profiles: Document open_rt, socket_rt and close_rt deprecation

2010-05-19 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
regards, stefan From e8459dc079118f9f635ef31c996019a0652e4907 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:31:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] RTDM device profiles: Document open_rt, socket_rt and close_rt deprecation --- include/rtdm/rtcan.h |4 ++-- include

Re: [Xenomai-core] rtdm_dev_register oops

2010-05-18 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 18.05.2010 13:03, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> hi, >> >> i got a exception in rtdm_dev_register(). I didnt call rtdm_dev_unregister >> in my driver >> and after insmodding the module again I got a oops. > > And that is surprising

[Xenomai-core] rtdm_dev_register oops

2010-05-18 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
usr/src/linux-headers-$(UNAME)/include/xenomai all:: $(MAKE) -C $(LINUXSOURCEDIR) SUBDIRS=$(PWD) modules clean:: $(RM) .*.cmd *.cmd *.o *.ko *.mod.c *.order *.symvers $(RM) -R .tmp* .PHONY: clean #include #include MODULE_AUTHOR( "Stefan Kisdaroczi" ); M

Re: [Xenomai-core] New Debian source package format 3.0

2010-05-16 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
t;> $ dch 'Switch to dpkg-source 3.0 (native) format' > > It is OK with me, but I probably do not have the proper tools installed. > Could someone do it and send me the patches? Stefan maybe? > > TIA. > patch attached, stefan >From fa86da573916f59869e6f2e5525

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-2 from debian.org,

2010-05-04 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 03.05.2010 20:46, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> Hi Philippe, >> >> Roland Stigge has accepted the "group xenomai" patch and uploaded xenomai >> 2.5.2-2 to debian unstable. >> I have attached a patch against rpm/for-

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-2 from debian.org,

2010-05-03 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
tefan From 1cde4f3c8a6d84ad1fc043682fa282fea809a228 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 10:37:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-2 from debian.org --- debian/changelog| 17 + debian/libxenomai1.dirs |1

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-1 from debian.org

2010-04-15 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
patch against rpm/for-upstream Stefan From 68882152f383e36ecde8cbb3e0f6474deb64197b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:11:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] debian: sync with 2.5.2-1 from debian.org --- debian/changelog |6 ++ debian

Re: [Xenomai-core] proc_file_read: Apparent buffer overflow

2010-03-18 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 10.03.2010 19:56, schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > Hi, > > cat /proc/xenomai/heap returns the first 4096 Bytes and fails then with "Bad > address". > On the console I see: "proc_file_read: Apparent buffer overflow!" > > xeno 2.5.1, linux 2.6.32.8, x8

[Xenomai-core] proc_file_read: Apparent buffer overflow

2010-03-10 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, cat /proc/xenomai/heap returns the first 4096 Bytes and fails then with "Bad address". On the console I see: "proc_file_read: Apparent buffer overflow!" xeno 2.5.1, linux 2.6.32.8, x86 32bit UP, native skin, lot of rt_queues: # ls -1 /proc/xenomai/registry/native/queues/ | wc -l 233 # ls -1

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-03-03 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 26.02.2010 15:07, schrieb Philippe Gerum: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:48 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> Am 26.02.2010 14:28, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>> On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:13 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >>>> Am 24.02.2010 14:13, schrieb Philippe Geru

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-26 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 26.02.2010 14:28, schrieb Philippe Gerum: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 14:13 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> Am 24.02.2010 14:13, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:11 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:06 +0100, Stefan Kisda

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-26 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 25.02.2010 18:18, schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > >>> >>> Hi Gilles, >>> >>> can a init.d script with >>> echo "" > /sys/module/xeno_nucleus/parameters/xenomai_gid >>> work in module and builtin case ? >> >> it

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-26 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 24.02.2010 14:13, schrieb Philippe Gerum: > On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:11 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:06 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >>> Hi Philippe, >>> >>> Am 23.02.2010 18:46, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>>> On T

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-25 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi Jeff, Am 25.02.2010 15:44, schrieb Jeff Weber: > Hello Stefan: > > I've been watching with interest the recent active work integrating > Debian and Xenomai. I am currently porting an embedded application to > Xenomai, and am surveying candidate Linux distributions. > > I did a test build, in

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-25 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 25.02.2010 15:29, schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > Am 25.02.2010 14:59, schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: >> Am 25.02.2010 14:49, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: >>> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-25 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 25.02.2010 14:59, schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > Am 25.02.2010 14:49, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: >> Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>>> >>>> In any case, thanks for your work s

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-25 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 25.02.2010 14:49, schrieb Gilles Chanteperdrix: > Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>> >>> In any case, thanks for your work so far. We probably need to discuss >>> the packaging issues o

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-25 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: > > In any case, thanks for your work so far. We probably need to discuss > the packaging issues on this list, so that we get both consistency and > usability in the future. > > Gilles and Roland, if this is fine with you, I'll handle the liaison

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-25 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 24.02.2010 14:06, schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > Hi Philippe, > > Am 23.02.2010 18:46, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >> On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:52 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>>> &

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-24 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi Philippe, Am 23.02.2010 18:46, schrieb Philippe Gerum: > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:52 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum: >>> >>> >>> In the future, maybe we could simply provide a wrapper

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-23 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571104 [3] http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-2.5.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bcd18f714f4cbeaaac0cc4a08e6c9f375aa3b77 From f8bfbe147654f9eb240b0e94d774185940444b8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Kisdaroczi Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:06:52 +01

Re: [Xenomai-core] Yet another ((weak)) bug

2010-02-12 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Am 12.02.2010 17:22, schrieb Jan Kiszka: > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: >> Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > this one requires some fixing too: > > xeno_sem_heap is marked weak. xeno_init_sem_heaps is called once per > i

Re: [Xenomai-core] Problem running klatency test

2009-06-29 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Shashank Bhatia schrieb: > [...] > open(/proc/xenomai/registry/native/pipes/klat_pipe): No such file or > directory > modprobe klat_mod or try the -P option? the module ist called xeno_klat. patch attached. diff --git a/src/testsuite/klatency/klatency.c b/src/testsuite/klatency/klatency.c index

Re: [Xenomai-core] Problem running klatency test

2009-06-22 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, Shashank Bhatia schrieb: > Dear All, > > I could manage to compile my patched kernel on ubuntu using > the following guide : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/GitKernelBuild > > Now when i installed Xenomai, i could run the latency tests, but when i > tried to run the kernel space

[Xenomai-core] xenomai homepage: missing description

2006-03-13 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
hi, suggestion for www.xenomai.org, page 'home': as its the first page displayed, there should be a small description about xenomai. You can take the first paragraph at gna [1] and add the supported archs and mention the GPL: Xenomai is a real-time development framework cooperating with the Lin

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] rt_heap reminder

2006-01-30 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi all, as a reminder (userspace, native skin, shared heap) [1]: API documentation: "If the heap is shared, this value can be either zero, or the same value given to rt_heap_create()." This is not true. As the heapsize gets altered in rt_heap_create for page size alignment, the following call to

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] rt_heap reminder

2006-01-30 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi all, as a reminder (userspace, native skin, shared heap) [1]: API documentation: "If the heap is shared, this value can be either zero, or the same value given to rt_heap_create()." This is not true. As the heapsize gets altered in rt_heap_create for page size alignment, the following call to

Re: [Xenomai-core] rt_heap in userspace, heapsize [patch]

2006-01-17 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi again, I looked at the sources now... Am Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:57 schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > Hi, > > I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace, > i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support. > I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86.

[Xenomai-core] rt_heap in userspace, heapsize

2006-01-17 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace, i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support. I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86. This should alloc the entire heap, according to the API documentation: rt_heap_create( ..., ..., 1, ... ) rt_heap_alloc( ...

Re: [Xenomai-core] rt_heap in userspace, heapsize [patch]

2006-01-17 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi again, I looked at the sources now... Am Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:57 schrieb Stefan Kisdaroczi: > Hi, > > I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace, > i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support. > I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86.

[Xenomai-core] rt_heap in userspace, heapsize

2006-01-17 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I made a small test with rt_heap_ in userspace, i think I understood the actual limitations of the userspace support. I used 1 as heapsize. Xenomai 2.1-RC2/x86. This should alloc the entire heap, according to the API documentation: rt_heap_create( ..., ..., 1, ... ) rt_heap_alloc( ...

[Xenomai-core] anonymous user-space tasks (again)

2006-01-15 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I tested Philipp's fix "Allow creating anon user-space tasks" [1][2] with Xenomai 2.1-RC2/2.6.15/x86 (2.0.3 should behave the same). anon rt_task_shadow: 2.0.1: worked 2.1-RC2: works, but only once (EEXIST) anon rt_task_spawn: 2.0.1: failed with ESRCH (-3) 2.1-RC2: works, but only once (EEXI

[Xenomai-core] anonymous user-space tasks (again)

2006-01-15 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I tested Philipp's fix "Allow creating anon user-space tasks" [1][2] with Xenomai 2.1-RC2/2.6.15/x86 (2.0.3 should behave the same). anon rt_task_shadow: 2.0.1: worked 2.1-RC2: works, but only once (EEXIST) anon rt_task_spawn: 2.0.1: failed with ESRCH (-3) 2.1-RC2: works, but only once (EEXI

[Xenomai-core] rt_task_spawn with NULL name and pascal linking

2006-01-08 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I needed a lot coffee and tobacco resources to find out that rt_task_spawn with NULL name will not work in userspace. The call failed with -3 (ESRCH?). This error seems not documented the xenomai api documention. Using rt_task_create and rt_task_start it was rt_task_start that failed. I thin

[Xenomai-core] rt_task_spawn with NULL name and pascal linking

2006-01-08 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I needed a lot coffee and tobacco resources to find out that rt_task_spawn with NULL name will not work in userspace. The call failed with -3 (ESRCH?). This error seems not documented the xenomai api documention. Using rt_task_create and rt_task_start it was rt_task_start that failed. I thin

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCHES] various fixes

2006-01-02 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi Jan, Am Montag, 2. Januar 2006 14.36 schrieb Jan Kiszka: > * rtdm-license.patch - add missing COPYING files to RTDM skin and lib >(or go for just a single file for ksrc/skins and src/skins if this is >applicable) The COPYING file in your patch contains the GPL license. Should'nt it be

[Xenomai-core] src/skins/*/COPYING consistency

2006-01-02 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
hi, license detail: in every src/skins/*/ directory containing source is a LGPL COPYING file, except in rtdm. For consistency there should be also one. Or only one file src/skins/COPYING ? thx kisda pgp2HGvCfie1Q.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCHES] various fixes

2006-01-02 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi Jan, Am Montag, 2. Januar 2006 14.36 schrieb Jan Kiszka: > * rtdm-license.patch - add missing COPYING files to RTDM skin and lib >(or go for just a single file for ksrc/skins and src/skins if this is >applicable) The COPYING file in your patch contains the GPL license. Should'nt it be

[Xenomai-core] src/skins/*/COPYING consistency

2006-01-02 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
hi, license detail: in every src/skins/*/ directory containing source is a LGPL COPYING file, except in rtdm. For consistency there should be also one. Or only one file src/skins/COPYING ? thx kisda pgpuQPXItL6DJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Xen

[Xenomai-core] autostart timer, rt_timer_start/stop

2005-12-29 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, cant the timer be started by default ? The current state (2.0.1) seems to lead to the following scenario: 1) Every app calls rt_timer_start() 2) If you call rt_timer_stop you can hurt other rt-apps, so dont call it 3) As some apps dont stop the timer, check in 1) if its already running I

[Xenomai-core] autostart timer, rt_timer_start/stop

2005-12-29 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, cant the timer be started by default ? The current state (2.0.1) seems to lead to the following scenario: 1) Every app calls rt_timer_start() 2) If you call rt_timer_stop you can hurt other rt-apps, so dont call it 3) As some apps dont stop the timer, check in 1) if its already running I