Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-02-02 Thread Philippe Gerum
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-29 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I realized, that *_irq_enable

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-24 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I realized, that *_irq_enable

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I realized, that *_irq_enable

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I realized, that *_irq_enable is used in various place/skins

Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-01-19 Thread Wolfgang Grandegger
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I realized, that *_irq_enable