Hi:
I see a lot's of activity around PPC embedded hardware. I'm happy to see
that there is intelligent lifeform beyond x86 :).
I' relatively new to this environnement, so if someone will post a short
list of "Xenomai tested" PPC embedded boards I think that will useful for
newbie like me.
TIA
S
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> a notification [1] has been posted today on the RTAI mailing list concerning
> the RTLWS 2005 agenda [2].
>
> So who is going to attend that workshop? Could someone share his/her
Me, likely. Yuchen Zhang (RT-Firewire) is also almost persuaded.
> imp
Hi everybody,
a notification [1] has been posted today on the RTAI mailing list concerning
the RTLWS 2005 agenda [2].
So who is going to attend that workshop? Could someone share his/her
impression of ones that took place in recent years?
Well, for me at least it could be a reason to make a t
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > Ignacio Garc~a P~rez wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
> > > latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
> > > (xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this t
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I know now what makes the difference: setting CC=\"$CC\" in
> XENO_KBUILD_CMD. Xenomai does this and seems to override the "-m32"
> extension of the kernel build system, RTnet does not.
Of course ! stupid me. In makefiles, the variables assignment passed on
command line take
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Ignacio Garc~a P~rez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
> > latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
> > (xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
> >
>
> Yes and
Ignacio García Pérez wrote:
Hi,
I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
(xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
Yes and no. There is a change pending in my tree that makes rt_t
Ignacio García Pérez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
> latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
> (xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
>
Expected yes, wanted no.
Avoid xeno_posix being loaded
Hi,
I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
(xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
Thanks.
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> a notification [1] has been posted today on the RTAI mailing list concerning
> the RTLWS 2005 agenda [2].
>
> So who is going to attend that workshop? Could someone share his/her
Me, likely. Yuchen Zhang (RT-Firewire) is also almost persuaded.
> imp
Hi everybody,
a notification [1] has been posted today on the RTAI mailing list concerning
the RTLWS 2005 agenda [2].
So who is going to attend that workshop? Could someone share his/her
impression of ones that took place in recent years?
Well, for me at least it could be a reason to make a t
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > Ignacio Garc~a P~rez wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
> > > latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
> > > (xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this t
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> I know now what makes the difference: setting CC=\"$CC\" in
> XENO_KBUILD_CMD. Xenomai does this and seems to override the "-m32"
> extension of the kernel build system, RTnet does not.
Of course ! stupid me. In makefiles, the variables assignment passed on
command line take
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> Ignacio Garc~a P~rez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
> > latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
> > (xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
> >
>
> Yes and
Ignacio García Pérez wrote:
Hi,
I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
(xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
Yes and no. There is a change pending in my tree that makes rt_t
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>>Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > They are for both. You can compile some helloworld64 by calling gcc
>> > without arguments or as easily a helloworld32 by running "gcc -m32" -
>> > all on the same box withouth additional cross-tool stuff.
>>
>>Ok, the -m32
Ignacio García Pérez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
> latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
> (xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
>
Expected yes, wanted no.
Avoid xeno_posix being loaded
Hi,
I'm quite new to xenomai (switching from RTAI). I noticed that the
latency_rt.ko module fails to start the timer if the posix skin module
(xeno_posix.ko) is loaded. Is this the expected behaviour?
Thanks.
___
Xenomai-help mailing list
Xenomai-help@
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>
>>Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> > They are for both. You can compile some helloworld64 by calling gcc
>> > without arguments or as easily a helloworld32 by running "gcc -m32" -
>> > all on the same box withouth additional cross-tool stuff.
>>
>>Ok, the -m32
19 matches
Mail list logo
