RE: XercesC++ vs MSXML on Windows platform

2001-10-18 Thread Nick Denning
On this memory leakage problem, it does seem the case that memory leaks come into releases with new functionality. However we have had very good operation in 1.3 and still have customers using this. We do re-test using bounds checker for each release which pretty soon establishes the presence of

RE: Xerces-C porting effort?

2001-10-18 Thread Nick Denning
If you have reasonable unix experience plus a C compiler, then it should be quite straight forward to: 1. Download the gcc g++ source, build the C++ compiler then compile the XERCES libraries on your platform. 2. The biggest problems we have faced are with the opensource autoconf, gzip, and all t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3938] - Memory leak when using the DOMParser

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: transcode() issue still happening

2001-10-18 Thread David_N_Bertoni
Make sure you're linking your release build against the release build of the parser, and your debug build against the debug version of the parser. The debug version of the parse .lib will have a "D" as the last character of the name, i.e. xerces-c_1D.lib. Also, just for completeness, it's: d

Re: Interested in getting changes into main Xerces distribution

2001-10-18 Thread Dean Roddey
> I am curious how much IBM is involved in this? I known they've done a > lot with java, JFS, and a few other things to use linux with e-commerce, > but I hadn't heard anything about involvement directly with Apache or > Xerces-c. (just curious) > IBM employees have provided the bulk of the devel

Re: Interested in getting changes into main Xerces distribution

2001-10-18 Thread D. Stimits
"Jason E. Stewart" wrote: > > "D. Stimits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is there an approximation of what a typical time is between releases for > > bugfixes? Is it typical for it to occur monthly? > > No, but things are changing. The IBM team hasn't really had a policy > of bugfix release

Re: transcode() issue still happening

2001-10-18 Thread Dean Roddey
Debug vs. non-debug is just as important as threaded vs non-threaded. Make sure you are using the same debug setting as the version of the parser you are linking against. -- Dean Roddey The Charmed Quark Controller Charmed Quark Software [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.charme

Re: transcode() issue still happening

2001-10-18 Thread Joe Marini
For some reason, it still happens. I can get it to reproduce with just a few lines: DOMString nodeValue("some value"); char *temp = nodeValue.transcode(); delete temp; I triple-checked my build settings, and according to the VC project settings dialog, I'm linking to the Multithreaded

Crash in HashXMLCh::getHashVal

2001-10-18 Thread Bagepalli, Kiran
I am trying to mimic EnumVal for Schema validation. I used personal-schema.xml and wrote this code. SchemaValidator* valToUse = new SchemaValidator; SAXParser parser(valToUse); parser.setValidationScheme(valScheme); try { parser.parse(xmlFile); } catch (

Re: transcode() issue still happening

2001-10-18 Thread David_N_Bertoni
You should double-check your settings for all configurations, then do a clean re-build, just to be sure. Unless you're corrupting the pointer value in your code, the switch to the mutlithreaded DLL run-times should fix the problem. Dave

Samples on schema parsing

2001-10-18 Thread Bagepalli, Kiran
Is there anyway to parse a schema standalone and get schema data. Similar to EnumVal sample Thanks Kiran - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3706] - internal memory leak in xerces-c1.5.0

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3705] - error in xerces-c-src1_5_1.tar.gz

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3565] - stream leaked in ReaderMgr

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3523] - SchemaElementDecl.cpp(242) : error C2202 : not all control paths return a value

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3365] - xmlconf: oasis/p16fail3.xml passed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3364] - xmlconf: oasis/p03fail1.xml passed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3363] - xmlconf: oasis/p75pass1.xml failed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3362] - xmlconf: oasis/p74pass1.xml failed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3328] - gTranscoder pointer is NULL after XMLPlatformUtils::Initialize();

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3170] - URLs with ? type fragments in them don't work.

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2879] - Memory-Leak in DOMString-Class

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2816] - Numerous datatype headers cause CC error 1144

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2815] - util/regx/RegxParser.cpp compile fails on HP-UX 10.20 with CC A.10.40

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2707] - DFAContentModel memory leaks

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2660] - SAX Major Memory Leak

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2649] - Huge memory leaks in Xerces

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2634] - simple use of substitutionGroup fails

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2596] - Bad DTD crashes DOM Parser.

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Memory leak

2001-10-18 Thread PeiYong Zhang
Williamson,   Yes, that tmpMutex shall be registered so that XMLPlatformUtil::terminate() can release it.   Would you please report the bug to bugzilla so that its status can be traced, thanks. Rgds, PeiYong   "Williamson, Siehnai" wrote:   Hi Everyone, There appears to be a memory leak i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2565] - The external subset can be empty (Section 2.8)

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2564] - Valid XML doc with defined xml:lang attribute fails on parsing

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2562] - Fixed Attribute Default validity constraint validation failed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2561] - Problem with standalone documents

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2512] - typing mistake in code example of chapter "Constructing an XML Reader"

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2474] - Leading "," in the SubstitutionGroupName

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2472] - Linker options ignored on IRIX

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2440] - delete on pointer from transcode() failed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2410] - DOMParser::parse() throws undocumented exceptions

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2391] - Problem in using Parser in solaris

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2365] - Huge performance problem with the parser in XMLScanner::sendCharData()

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2363] - XMLScanner::sendCharData() can send the wrong length to the handler

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2329] - problem in using parser in solaris

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2311] - parseReset throws exception if parseFirst returns false

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2269] - XMLScanner::scanProlog problem with

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2263] - 'SIZE' : redefinition ( BooleanDatatypeValidator.cpp )

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2245] - IDOM rejects

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2079] - DOMCount fails on xml files that contains DTD

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2058] - Memory Leak of default attribute value

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2043] - XMLFormatter unallocates arrays incorrectly

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2032] - DOMString or DOMNode Memory Leak when DTD is present

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2012] - Internal Compiler Error building xerces-c on solaris 2.8

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

transcode() issue still happening

2001-10-18 Thread Joe Marini
After reading the FAQ, I double-checked my project settings to make sure I'm linking against the Multithreaded DLL version of the C runtime, but I'm still getting assertions when trying to delete the string pointer returned by DOMString.transcode(). Is this a known issue?

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1942] - Cannot build on solaris due to g++ "internal compiler error"

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1446] - Problems with replaceChild & appendChild

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1345] - BinHTTPURLInputStream ignoring query params

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1329] - SAX2XMLReaderImpl leaks XMLBuffers

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3666] - Win32MsgLoader unable to retrieve error text if DLL is renamed

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: format-number() doesn't work

2001-10-18 Thread David_N_Bertoni
You've done several things wrong: 1. You've posted a Xalan question on the Xerces-C list. You should post such questions on the Xalan developer list. 2. You didn't read the documentation. It contains very explicit instructions for enabling support for format-number() in Xalan-C++.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3126] - Spaces following PI name and before any character are deleted.

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3054] - IDOM_Document::getElementsByTagName() segfaults

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3052] - IDOM problem with multiple parses

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3018] - Using idom causes unaligned access errors on TRU64

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3017] - Build error (using MSVC 5.0 )

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2989] - IDOM_Nodelist segfault

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2974] - getLength error

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2960] - DTD file looked for even when validation turned off

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 2947] - IDOM segfault

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1693] - AIX CSetDefs.hpp and distributed .lib incorrect (bool exists)

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1650] - DOMString error on LINUX

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1605] - Null attribute name on parsed documents when doNamespaces() = true

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1601] - DOMString bug

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1500] - notation.getSystemId() always returns null string

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1306] - memory leaks in DOM_Element::setAttribute

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1262] - Can't delete the pointer returned by DOMString::transcode()

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: compiling 1.5.1 on linux for s390 (unresolved symbols)

2001-10-18 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"Stefan Voelkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i had some trouble compiling xerces 1.5.1 on a s390 running RedHat > linux. The compilation of the .so made no problems but the samples > reported a bunch of unresolved symbols. Thanks Stefan, What version of RedHat is this, 7.1? Cheers, jas. ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1158] - use PATH_MAX instead of fixed size 1024 buffer!

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1142] - DTDElementDecl "re-order" warnings

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 766] - Build fails on AIX 4.3.3 (IBM RS/6000), VisualAge C++ Pro v5

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4202] - Parser do not throw exceptions

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Initialize()/Terminate() cleanup commit status

2001-10-18 Thread PeiYong Zhang
Jesse, We are looking into Mark's patch and the code will be available in the next release (the one after the coming 1.5.2) if everything turns out to be OK. Rgds, PeiYong Jesse Jesse Pelton wrote: Is anyone among the committers working on committing the Initialize()/Terminate() cleanup patc

compiling 1.5.1 on linux for s390 (unresolved symbols)

2001-10-18 Thread Stefan Voelkel
Hi, i had some trouble compiling xerces 1.5.1 on a s390 running RedHat linux. The compilation of the .so made no problems but the samples reported a bunch of unresolved symbols. adding -rdynamic to the linking of the .so helped and now everything compiles fine: g++ -DLINUX -shared -fPIC -rdyn

Re: Is this the right list for Xalan questions?

2001-10-18 Thread Joseph_Kesselman
This is the right place for Xerces questions... but Xalan has its own lists. For the C++ version, try xalan-c-dev. For the Java version, it's xalan-j-dev. When you do post there, you might want to provide more information about what version of the code you're compiling, what platform you're comp

Is this the right list for Xalan questions?

2001-10-18 Thread Bruce Bailey
Hi I this the correct place for Xalan questions. I am having trouble compiling Xalan. Thanks, Bruce Bruce Bailey 2525 SW First Avenue Portland, OR 97201 [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 1699] - Memory leak in DOMSring class

2001-10-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Interested in getting changes into main Xerces distribution

2001-10-18 Thread Jason E. Stewart
"D. Stimits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there an approximation of what a typical time is between releases for > bugfixes? Is it typical for it to occur monthly? No, but things are changing. The IBM team hasn't really had a policy of bugfix releases that occur on a regular basis. Instead th

Initialize()/Terminate() cleanup commit status

2001-10-18 Thread Jesse Pelton
Is anyone among the committers working on committing the Initialize()/Terminate() cleanup patch submitted by Mark Weaver a few weeks back? (See http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xerces-c-dev&m=100161895430193&w=2.) If not, is anyone willing to sign up to do it? -

Re: XercesC++ vs MSXML on Windows platform

2001-10-18 Thread Tinny Ng
working on it we had some build problems during last week. Hopefully it can be ready sometime early next week. Stay tuned. :-) Tinny Herb Chong wrote: > speaking of timely, when is next point version of Xerces due out? i'm still > looking for the memory leak fixes and Borland C++Builder

Re: XercesC++ vs MSXML on Windows platform

2001-10-18 Thread Herb Chong
speaking of timely, when is next point version of Xerces due out? i'm still looking for the memory leak fixes and Borland C++Builder 5 support to be part of an official release. Herb... David, I had a similar experience with MSXML3/4. I originally used MSXML because it was the native XML

Re: XercesC++ vs MSXML on Windows platform

2001-10-18 Thread Don Mastrovito
David, I had a similar experience with MSXML3/4. I originally used MSXML because it was the native XML parser for windows and in many respects, provides richer (more functional) APIs. However the memory leakage and deployment problems caused me to seek other alternatives. With Xerces, the m

Xerces-C porting effort?

2001-10-18 Thread Jones Gwyn
Can anyone with some experience of porting Xerces-C give me advice? I am trying to work out the effort required to do a port to the Siemens BS2000/OSD mainframe environment. This is based on standard microprocessors (Risc) and /390 architecture. It has POSIX support, but the couple of developers

Re: Interested in getting changes into main Xerces distribution

2001-10-18 Thread D. Stimits
I don't know why, but I always get two copies of replies. Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Wed, 2001-10-17 at 22:51, D. Stimits wrote: > > Murray Cumming wrote: > > > > > ...snip... > > > > > > > > > > > > What is required to get the ball rolling on this as a change? Should I > > > > submit an alter

Re: Anyone tried porting xerces-c to WinCE?

2001-10-18 Thread Simon Fell
I looked into doing it, but decided to switch to expat instead, which was fairly trivial to port. Cheers Simon On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:08:38 +0200, in xml you wrote: >Hi! > >Has anyone tried porting Xerces-C to WinCE platform and was successful?. > >Since Xerces-C Library is heavily dependent o

RE: plaforms

2001-10-18 Thread Nick Denning
Understand. That does sound like its a good idea to provide a port on forte pretty soon as per the original email. Nick -Original Message- From: Hespelt, Steve (Exchange) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 18 October 2001 12:56 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: plaforms just my $0.02

format-number() doesn't work

2001-10-18 Thread mvasicek
Hello, I am using XalanTransformer - transform() method. If I specify in an XSL the following: or the formatting doesn't work. I can see only one digit as a result. Do I use something wrong? Thanks in advance, Miro.

XercesC++ vs MSXML on Windows platform

2001-10-18 Thread DELGRANCHE David
Hi all, I'm using MSXML4 on a NT platform to parse and modify XML documents. I'm testing my application and have memory problems. It seems that the application doesn't release my object. If I execute my application many successive times, I have no more memory avail

RE: xml4com and wsh

2001-10-18 Thread Murphy, James
I didn't think you could Dim variables as a type in VB _Script_? Jim > -Original Message- > From: Curt Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:39 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: xml4com and wsh > > > > This behaviour makes it impossible to simpl

AW: xml4com and wsh

2001-10-18 Thread Groeger, Olaf
> Actually, that usage is pretty unusual and most MSXML calling VB code > doesn't run into the problem. If you had dim'd strXML as String instead of > Variant it would have worked. You are right that there should be a call to > VariantChangeType to coerce the argument to VT_BSTR within the > imp

Re: xml4com and wsh

2001-10-18 Thread Curt Arnold
> This behaviour makes it impossible to simply replace MSXML by Xerces. Actually, that usage is pretty unusual and most MSXML calling VB code doesn't run into the problem. If you had dim'd strXML as String instead of Variant it would have worked. You are right that there should be a call to Var

xml4com and wsh

2001-10-18 Thread Groeger, Olaf
Hi, i'm a newbie on xerces, but very interested in the com wrapper. i made some experiments with it and found out that it is problematic to use with vbscript in that away, that it rejects byref parameters. for instance: dim strXML strXML = "test.xml" dim xmlDoc set xmlDoc = CreateObject( "Xerces

  1   2   >