AbstractDOMParser cores on parse, try to allocate memory in a multithreaded
application
---
Key: XERCESC-1359
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1359
Project: Xerces-C++
On Feb 25, 2005, at 10:31 AM, David Cargill wrote:
Hi James/Alberto,
I checked in a fix for XSValueTest. Can you let me know if it gets
rid of
the errors? Thanks.
Hi Dave,
This fixed the errors, but some warnings remain:
XSValueTest/XSValueTest.cpp:1363: warning: this decimal constant is
unsi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1355?page=history ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1355:
--
Resolution: Invalid
There is a programming error in the code, inside buildCLISubTree: the call to
buildCLISubTree(n->getNextSibling(),
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1355?page=history ]
Alberto Massari updated XERCESC-1355:
-
Attachment: testcase.zip
> DOMBuilder parse wrong node type
>
>
> Key: XERCESC-1355
> URL: ht
Title: RE: FW: [jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1355) DOMBuilder parse wrong node type
Thanks, I found out where actually the problem is. By the way, you have any documents and samples on DOMNodeIterator. Does it make the traversal easier ? I need to traverse the entire tree; but with recursive DF
Hi Vu,
At 18.46 24/02/2005 -0500, Vu Nguyen wrote:
Just in case you did not get this one. Here all the necessary attachments.
It looks like I finally got your attachments ;-)
There is a bug in your code, that will cause to expand just the first element.
Inside buildCLISubTree(DOMNode *n, int depth)
At 13.31 25/02/2005 -0500, David Cargill wrote:
Hi James/Alberto,
I checked in a fix for XSValueTest. Can you let me know if it gets rid of
the errors? Thanks.
Hi David,
gcc 3.3.1 and 3.3 now compile fine (Borland still reports "test fail", though).
Thanks,
Alberto
Regards,
David A. Cargill
XML
Hi James/Alberto,
I checked in a fix for XSValueTest. Can you let me know if it gets rid of
the errors? Thanks.
Regards,
David A. Cargill
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
(905) 413-2371, tie 969
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: FW: [jira] Commented: (XERCESC-1355) DOMBuilder parse wrong node type
Just in case you did not get this one. Here all the necessary attachments.
-Original Message-
From: Nguyen, Vu [CAR:SI12:EXCH]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:14 AM
To: 'Alberto Massari (JIRA)'
Subject:
At 08.47 25/02/2005 -0500, David Cargill wrote:
Hi,
For XSValueTest can someone send me the compiler errors? I have a guess
of which lines are causing problems but would rather see the real problem
before making a fix.
I see these error when compiling using MinGW:
$ c++ --version
c++.exe (GCC) 3.
... feeling lucky... ;)...
And for UtilTests:
../src/xercesc/util/CountedPointer.c: In member function `const T&
xercesc_2_6::CountedPointerTo::operator*() const [with T =
TestClass]':
UtilTests/CoreTests_CountedPointer.cpp:95: instantiated from here
../src/xercesc/util/CountedPointer.c:124: er
On Feb 25, 2005, at 5:47 AM, David Cargill wrote:
Hi,
For XSValueTest can someone send me the compiler errors? I have a
guess
of which lines are causing problems but would rather see the real
problem
before making a fix.
(I know you didn't ask for this, but...just in case you're feeling
lucky.
On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:32 AM, Alberto Massari wrote:
Good job James!
One of the things I hate about the current structure is that I am
forced to run runConfigure with the same arguments three times, for
the sources, the samples and the tests. Will the new ./configure be
placed in the "c" folder a
Hey,
The nice thing about the more recent versions of Pathan are that they
integrate properly as DOM suggests. All you have to do is ask for an
implementation with XPath as a feature and you can use the DOM Level 3
XPath Document stuff.
Gareth
James Berry wrote:
On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Ga
On Feb 25, 2005, at 1:33 AM, Gareth Reakes wrote:
Hey,
I have had another thought. Can we add options to include Xalan /
Pathan during the build? Either by pointing to where they are or even
downloading them? XPath support is frequently asked for and there is
no chance we will have it soon.
Bravo!
-jdb
On Feb 25, 2005, at 6:00 AM, Gareth Reakes wrote:
Hey all,
We are now a top level project!
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
--
On Feb 25, 2005, at 5:47 AM, David Cargill wrote:
Hi,
For XSValueTest can someone send me the compiler errors? I have a
guess
of which lines are causing problems but would rather see the real
problem
before making a fix.
David,
Are you sure you're ready... (I think the last of these errors woul
Hey all,
We are now a top level project!
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For addition
Hi,
For XSValueTest can someone send me the compiler errors? I have a guess
of which lines are causing problems but would rather see the real problem
before making a fix.
Regards,
David A. Cargill
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
(905) 413-2371, tie 969
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1343?page=history ]
Alberto Massari resolved XERCESC-1343:
--
Resolution: Fixed
The patch is in CVS. Please verify
Alberto
> SAX2XMLReaderImpl performance improvement
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1358?page=comments#action_59758 ]
Gareth Reakes commented on XERCESC-1358:
I committed that patch David. For your next problem, is there any nice way of
finding the nearest prime? I know its not po
Hey,
I have had another thought. Can we add options to include Xalan /
Pathan during the build? Either by pointing to where they are or even
downloading them? XPath support is frequently asked for and there is no
chance we will have it soon.
Gareth
Alberto Massari wrote:
Good job James!
One o
Hey,
Cheers Scott. I will commit your patch.
Gareth
Scott Cantor wrote:
Has anybody else tried to build these w/gcc4?
Yeah, I did an RPM build of my patched 2.6.1 tree and had to hack on a
couple of tests for Fedora Core 3.
Patch below.
-- Scott
--- xerces-c-src_2_6_0/tests/XSValueTest/XSV
Good job James!
One of the things I hate about the current structure is that I am forced to
run runConfigure with the same arguments three times, for the sources, the
samples and the tests. Will the new ./configure be placed in the "c" folder
and automatically generate the three Makefiles?
Albe
At 15.52 24/02/2005 -0800, James Berry wrote:
Is anybody else out there working with Xerces under gcc4?
In working on the new autoconf stuff, I tried to run all of the testss,
and ran into errors compiling several of them under gcc4:
- ParserTest: I can't remember what was broken in compiling
Hey,
Very nice :) Will be fantastic. We have started planning how to
integrate XInclude and are waiting for SVN to start.
Gareth
James Berry wrote:
On Feb 24, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
James Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just to keep a little excitement going here, I've got a bi
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1358?page=history ]
Gareth Reakes reassigned XERCESC-1358:
--
Assign To: Gareth Reakes
> RefHashTableOf::rehash() is not exception-safe
> --
>
> Key: X
27 matches
Mail list logo
