Scoot,
The new downloadable has
the debug version now, please verify at http://www.apache.org/dist/xml/xerces-c/binaries/WinNT_msvc60/,
thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
"Scott Cantor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/12/2004 05:41 PM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Sub
Allann,
The all.mak is meant for
building 64bit only. To build 32 bit you may
want to build from xerces-all.dsw.
Rgds,
PeiYong
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/09/2004 03:04 PM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Error on building for 32
bits
Hi, w
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1294?page=comments#action_54955 ]
PeiYong Zhang commented on XERCESC-1294:
Norman,
I've put a patch in cvs, could you please verify? thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
> Compiler Warnings on I
[ http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1292?page=comments#action_54884 ]
PeiYong Zhang commented on XERCESC-1292:
Ralf,
Actually I've tried to reproduce this on XercesC2_5_0, by adding printf in the
SAX2CountHandlers::startEl
Duncan,
$> aCC --version
HP ANSI C++ B3910B A.03.52
Rgds,
PeiYong
"Duncan Sawry \(DB\)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/26/2004 03:47 AM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Xerces-C++ 2.5.0 aCC
compiler version
Hi,
Please can you tell me what
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1294?page=comments#action_54862 ]
PeiYong Zhang commented on XERCESC-1294:
Norman,
Can you post the list of offending methods? thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
> Compiler Warnings on IRIX with MIPS
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1292?page=comments#action_54861 ]
PeiYong Zhang commented on XERCESC-1292:
Ralf,
I've tested this (SAX2Count) with XercesC2_6_0, and the noOfAttrs is 1 (not 2, and
the default='0&
Scott,
In order to be consistent
with XercesJ, and actually that is what XercesJ does now, is to
expose the normalized/unnormalized value
in DOM based on the DOM L3's normalization_data
flag, while always get internal representation
normalized and in your case, the base64 data
containing lin
Bentley,
Xerces can be built on
Solaris2.9 as well.
Rgds,
PeiYong
"Bentley, Steven"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
10/19/2004 09:38 AM
Please respond to
xerces-c-dev
To
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Xerces for 64-bit Solaris
2.9
According to the websi
Scott,
Yes, the DOM content get
normalized as well and therefore you can't get
your raw data back.
The current behavior
needs to change so that the flag has an effect on
DOM content only (more precisely, element
content only. Attribute normalization
is always done).
"datatype-normaliza
Scott,
Yes, this flag shall not
affect content validity (in this case, the base64 data), and this
behavior is to be changed.
However, I noticed that
in the DOM tree, the content remains unnormlized irregardless
of the flag (of course this is not correct
either). I think you can set the no
Hi all,
The Xerces-C team is very pleased to
announce that Xerces-C 2.6.0 has been released today. Along with
many bug fixes, the major features of the new release are:
. Reduce footprint of DLL by building
the deprecated DOM as a separate library
. Various enhancements to the schema
component
Hi, all,
As we are evaluating/fixing
the outstanding blocking/critical bugs, we propose the code frozen time
be extended to EST 12:00pm Thursday
Sept 30 2004, and therefore, please submit/checkin patches
before that deadline, thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
PeiYong Zhang/Toronto/[EMAIL
been accomplished since 2.5,
> and many important bugs fixed. I'm not trying to hold up 2.6
> arbitrarily, but simply to make sure that we discussion about good
> criteria for a release.
>
> So:
>
> - Are those blockers all really blockers?
> - Are there othe
Hi all,
There are many bug fixes[1]
to the XercesC2_5_0 and new features[2] implemented since
the release of XercesC2_5_0, it is time
to produce a new release, XercesC2_6_0.
I'll suggest that we should
aim to publish this by the end of September, and in the mean
time try and fix as ma
+1.
Rgds,
PeiYong
Durmus,
You may need to compile
and link with "-mt". Build the xercesC from the latest code base
and see
if it can run on your hp-ia box.
Rgds,
PeiYong
"P.M.S.Prakash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 08/04/2004 10:25:36 AM:
> Hi Durmus,
>
> As per the release plan, I read that support on It
Peter,
I've tried your sample
instance file with the current version, 2.5.0 and did not see any exception,
can you use this version rather than
2.2.0?
Rgds
Peiyong
"Peter Guyatt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 05/11/2004 08:28:15 AM:
> Hi All,
>
> I was wondering if someone would be able
Jeroen,
Make sure your Doxygen
is on your %PATH%, and run from xercesc_/doc/Doxygen.
Rgds,
PeiYong
"Jeroen N. Witmond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 11/29/2003 08:48:01 AM:
> I have the feeling I am overlooking the obvious, but the question
remains:
> How do I (re)build the contents of dire
Hi, there,
The Xerces-c website has been refreshed with 2.5.0 documentation
available.
Regards,
Peiyong Zhang
XML Parsers Development, IBM Toronto Laboratory
D2-265, 8200 Warden Ave, Markham, Ont L6G 1C7, Canada
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (905)413-4088 Fax: (905)413-4854; T/L
Hi, all,
The Xerces-C team is happy to announce
that Xerces-C 2.5.0 is now
available. There are several major enhancements
in this release:
- Fix duplicate attribute detection
when namespaces are disabled
- Stricter use of static memory manager
for static data only
- PSVI bug fixes and enhanceme
All,
As Xerces-C2.5.0 is to
be rolled out on Monday, Feb. 16, 2004, it would be great
to have all the updated
project files for active ports, as well as bug fixes, be checked
in cvs before 10:00am
that morning, thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
+1
PeiYong
Neil Graham/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 02/03/2004
08:56:26 PM:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> As folks who've been following this list for a while will have noticed,
> there's at least one particularly nasty bug in 2.4.0 that's driving
folks
> crazy. That is, the parser som
+1 for both Alby and David.
Congrats!
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From:
Gareth
Reakes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:40
AM
Subject: Vote for new committers
Hi all,I propose that we invite Alby and David Cargill
to become c
Marcin,
It depends on the
message loading. Detailed discussion can be found at
http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/faq-build.html#faq-16
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From:
Marcin
Rzeźnicki
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:07
Scott,
Following is the
production copied from the Schema Datatype errata
(http://www.w3.org/2001/05/xmlschema-errata#Errata2),
it allows
optional ONE whitespace
ONLY.
se64Binary ::= S? B64quartet*
Base64final?B64quartet::= B64 S? B64 S?
B64 S? B64 S?B64final :
Adam,
The algorithm (from the
RFC) to encode/decode is based on byte, therefore it is more appropriate to
do the conversion in terms of XMLByte (which is a byte) rather than XMLCh (which
could be NOT a byte).
Application can use
the decode(XMLCh*) while internally it is done in d
But resetPool() is proected, so i guess u shall call resetDocumentPool()
instead.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Rydgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:50 PM
Subject: RE: parser->parse() question
> I think it is the same call.
Hi, there,
If I remember correctly, the said getTextContent() was added after 2.2
and before 2.3, that is saying you may have it from one of the nightly
builds
in between, but not in 2.2.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Frid
Doug,
If that is the case, u may open a bugzilla report on this, the more
specific info
provided (platform, version, the step u go through, etc), the quicker we can
have it resolved.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Chinnery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Did you add the path where the libarries located to LD_LIBRARY_PATH (
or SHLIB_PATH)?
you may run ldd on DOMcount to see if the libxercesc is resolved or not.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Chinnery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 200
Image people write a binary number in a check. Obviously base 10 is a more
natural way. The same goes to schema/instance document author.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: "Bagepalli, Kiran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 2:16 PM
Subject
Hi, all,
I gonna check in Erik's code (thanks Erik), and draft an FAQ on the
method(s) to clarify
the ownership issue of the returned text.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Rydgren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 4:40 AM
Sub
Elliot,
You may do the verification once the fix is in the nightly build.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:06 PM
Subject: DOMWriter->writeNode with DocumentFragment
> When I try to "get XML" on a DO
Would you please open a bugzilla report on this? thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 6:06 PM
Subject: DOMWriter->writeNode with DocumentFragment
> When I try to "get XML" on a DOMDocumentFragment the
Hi, j,
Would you please close the bug, thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
>From: "jNautics" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Xerces unzip
>Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 14:55:34 -0700
>
>Thanx so much for the reply.
>I tried to unzip it from a different computer and it worked.
>So, who kno
-12-14 at 14:00, Tinny Ng wrote:
> > I will be on vacation during x'mas. Unless other committers volunteer to do this,
> > otherwise I plan to do it sometime in
> > January next year.
>
> Could you please give us an update on this? It's been such a long time.
> I
to zero as well, etc.)
To this extend, the parser is comformant to the specs as
it does what is told, all told, nothing but told.
Rgds,
PeiYong Zhang
Excerpt from the specs:
3.2.4.1 Lexical representation
...
The special values positive and negative zero,
positive and
Williamson,
Yes, that tmpMutex shall be registered
so that XMLPlatformUtil::terminate() can release it.
Would you please report the bug to bugzilla
so that its status can be traced, thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong
"Williamson, Siehnai" wrote:
Hi Everyone,
There appears to be a memory leak i
Jesse,
We are looking into Mark's patch and the code
will be available in the next release (the one after the coming 1.5.2)
if everything turns out to be OK.
Rgds,
PeiYong
Jesse
Jesse Pelton wrote:
Is anyone among the committers working on committing
the
Initialize()/Terminate() cleanup patc
ose a similar patch ( adding encode()) to HexBin ?
thanks.
Rgds,
PeiYong Zhang
Petr Gotthard wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> please find attached patches for Base64 class, that provides
> several improvements.
>
> The main change is new method "Base64::encode" for enco
41 matches
Mail list logo
