Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

Hi, the implementor of the previous patch has not got back to us with an updated patch since the middle of last month. I suggest we apply your patch so we definitely have a pretty print in the next release. If we need to change it we still can. Send me the patch and I will review and app

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

odd - i sent this the other day but it never came through - resending now... : Hello - thought I should get back into this thread since I started it all. I've been sitting back observing since alot of the discussion is above my current XML knowledge. In any case it appears that a general cons

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

p - thanks. Gareth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/12/2002 04:31 AM Please respond to xerces-c-dev                 To:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         cc:                 Subject:        Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation Hi all,                 I don't want this thread to disappear i

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

Hi all, I don't want this thread to disappear into oblivion again so this is the last chance to speak up. Duncun, have you or do you intend to query the DOM WG on the issues you raised? Gareth -- Gareth Reakes, Head of Product Development +44-1865-203192 DecisionSoft Limited

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

Hi, On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > wrt to fitting in with spec. > If an element is defined as mixed by a DTD then you can't insert or remove > white space for the purposes of being 'human readable' because if the > whitespace is important then what the human reads (after pretty

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

My 2 cents on the FormatPrettyPrint issue: The XML applications that we write are always able to process XML written by humans (or monkeys, who knows..) and XML that is machine generated. The machine generated XML might or might not have any white space, the manually XML documents are almost alway

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

To:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         cc:                 Subject:        Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation Hi,                 I don't see how we would fit that in with the spec. It states "Formatting the output by adding whitespace to produce a pretty-printed, indented, human-readable form.

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

"Gareth Reakes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The way I had been thinking (I am of course happy to be told I am > wrong :)) is that it did not really matter as long as it was > consistent. I felt that the purpose of this feature was literally to > pretty print and not to worry about validity. With

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

Hi, I don't see how we would fit that in with the spec. It states "Formatting the output by adding whitespace to produce a pretty-printed, indented, human-readable form. The exact form of the transformations is not specified by this specification. Setting this feature to true will set

RE: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

ow_bug.cgi?id=13840 for another >implementation. > >-Original Message- >From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:12 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: FormatPrettyPrint implementation <> >My implementation of PrettyPri

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

areth Reakes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21/11/2002 09:56 PM Please respond to xerces-c-dev                 To:        [EMAIL PROTECTED]         cc:                 Subject:        Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation Hi,                 nice work :). The spec does not say how the pretty printing sho

RE: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

another implementation. -Original Message- From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FormatPrettyPrint implementation <> My implementation of PrettyPrint seems to work with some random XML files I was able t

RE: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

See http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13840 for another implementation. -Original Message- From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: FormatPrettyPrint implementation Hello, I should probably

Re: FormatPrettyPrint implementation

Hi, nice work :). The spec does not say how the pretty printing should work so if no one has any objections to the way you have done it then I suggest we commit it and see what users say. I know many people ask for this functionality. Gareth On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Kevin King wrote: >

FormatPrettyPrint implementation

Hello, I should probably first issue the disclaimer that as of a few days ago I did not know any details about XML, nor had even heard of Xerces. I have however been able to very quickly integrate Xerces-C++ into my application and get some basic XML functionality working using the DOM API.