Hey all,
Now we are a top level project we have another thing on our plate -
moving the web site. Are there any changes anyone thinks we should make?
Also, we should now ensure that the svn repository goes in the correct
place.
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon
Bravo!
-jdb
On Feb 25, 2005, at 6:00 AM, Gareth Reakes wrote:
Hey all,
We are now a top level project!
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
Hey all,
We are now a top level project!
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
/2004 02:44 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Re: [VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces into a top-level project
Hi all,
This vote has been open for a week now, and it looks to me like it's time
to call it. So far, I've counted 14 +1's from active Xerces co
> >
> > 1 INTRODUCTION
> > ==
> > 1.1 Apache Xerces is a collaborative software development project
> > dedicated to providing robust, full-featured, commercial-quality, and
> > freely available XML parsers and closely related technologies
> > on a wide
+1
Neil Graham wrote:
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text of
the motion, to which I give my +1, is as follows:
The Xerces community
+1 on Neil's motion below.
Yay!
--- Neil Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
>
> I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform
> Xerces
> into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foun
Hey,
Is it that you think this is to restrictive, or not restrictive
enough? I have been talking to a lot of people here at XML 2004 about
what they would like to see in Xerces in the future. People have been
suggesting different parser technologies and different validation
technologies. When
2004 11:21 PM
Please respond to
xerces-j-dev
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
[VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces into a top-level project
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we
On Nov 14, 2004, at 11:21 PM, Neil Graham wrote:
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform
Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text
of
the motion, to which I give my +1, is as follo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
[VOTE]: motion to transform
Xerces into a top-level project
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text
of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
[VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces
into a top-level project
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text
of
+1.
Thanks Neil.
Regards,
David A. Cargill
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
(905) 413-2371, tie 969
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 - And thanks Neil for all the hard work!
Cheers,
Berin
Neil Graham wrote:
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text of
the motion
+1.
Thanks for getting all this together, Neil.
James.
On Nov 14, 2004, at 8:21 PM, Neil Graham wrote:
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform
Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. Th
Here's my +1.
Thanks,
Neil.
Neil Graham/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/14/2004
11:21:54 PM:
> Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
>
> I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform
Xerces
> into a top-level project of the Apach
int where we can vote to transform
Xerces
> into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The
text of
> the motion, to which I give my +1, is as follows:
>
> The Xerces community recommends to the Apache Software Foundation
Board
> that:
>
> 1. The top-lev
Hi all,
Thanks for the nomination for chair Neil.
+1
Gareth
On 15 Nov 2004, at 4:21, Neil Graham wrote:
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform
Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Founda
ICENSE-2.0)?
---
At 23.21 14/11/2004 -0500, Neil Graham wrote:
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text of
the mot
l Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
>
> I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform
Xerces
> into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The
text of
> the motion, to which I give my +1, is as follows:
>
> The Xerces community recommen
Hello all Xerces developers and XML PMC'ers,
I think we're finally at the point where we can vote to transform Xerces
into a top-level project of the Apache Software Foundation. The text of
the motion, to which I give my +1, is as follows:
The Xerces community recommends to
3457600 -0500
+++ charter-current.txt 2004-11-12 09:23:16.078779200 -0500
@@ -48,13 +48,18 @@
3 HISTORY
=
-3.1 The Apache Xerces project was originally part of the Apache XML
Project.
-In late 2004, reflecting the growth both in the Apache
-XML project and in Apache Xerces, Apache Xerces becam
Hello Neil,
I'm also interested in being on the PMC. Please add
me to the list.
Neil Graham/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/10/2004
03:04:36 PM:
> Originally, I'd hoped that the PMC could simply be composed of all
active
> committers. Largely because these are so numerous, I no longer
ISTORY
=
3.1 The Apache Xerces project was originally part of the Apache XML
Project.
In late 2004, reflecting the growth both in the Apache
XML project and in Apache Xerces, Apache Xerces became a top-level
Project of the Apache Software Foundation. However, Apache Xerces still
shares m
:52 Subject: Re: [VOTE]: motion to
transform Xerces into a top-level project as a member
AMof the "federation" of XML projects
Can't help myself, I'm going to stir the pot again
Andy - did you update the wiki with your thoughts?
Cheers,
Berin
Andy Clark wrote:
Neil Graham wrote:
I've now rolled some of the points that we seem to have consensus on into
the original charter I suggested back at the beginning of Ap
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
et> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to deprecated and/or remove the HTML DOM
implementation because it's appearently badly broken. Without people willing
to take ownership, I'm not sure how spinning off these components on their
own would improve this situation.
> >>I'm specifically trying to organize the X
Hi Andy,
> How do you feel about settling on the following terms:
>* project: the top level project (TLP)
>* sub-project: a functional category related to the TLP
>* product: a specific implementation
> So "Xerces" would be the project wherea
Neil Graham wrote:
Much thanks for your efforts in helping this discussion get started
again--it did need a shot in the arm!
And I really hate to have to push back, but I think it's important to
decide on what the "lay of the land" in the new Xerces world will look
like, before formally throwing t
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/09/2004 05:43 Subject: Re: [VOTE]: motion t
>> That's because that's what it would technically be if something just
>> called "Xerces" were a TLP (top-level project).
>
> That's where we disagree, I guess.
Indeed it is. And I'm glad we agree on that: the first part of resolving
a debate is to
Andy Clark wrote:
That's where we disagree, I guess. I consider all the parser
implementations as "Xerces", the TLP. They are built, packaged,
and shipped separately but I still consider them all the same
thing at that level. With that view, Xerces-* are all "Xerces".
Then the sub-projects are col
chnically be if something just called
"Xerces" were a TLP (top-level project).
> Perhaps it would be easier
> to start by defining what we want to ship and then work backwards
> from there.
Sounds good. So far, we only ship archives containing jars, DLL's and
source
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/04/2004 02:09 Subject: Re: [VOTE]: motion to
transform Xerces into a top-level project as a member
Andy Clark wrote:
I don't see any problem with have a PMC that deals with all
Xerces implementations but still considering the different
implementations "projects" with their own sub-projects. For
example, Xerces-J could have an HTML sub-project with the
HTML DOM implementation and an HTML parser
ts) TLPs.
I'm in support of making Xerces a top-level project as long
as my concerns with the draft charter are addressed.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Berin,
thankyou for that summary. I add my +1 to making Xerces a
top-level project.
Gareth
--
Gareth Reakes, Managing Director Parthenon Computing
+44-1865-811184 http://www.parthcomp.com
Alberto Massari wrote:
Hi Berin,
can you elaborate on the consequences of this change? At least for me
it's not completely clear what it means. This is what I understood:
- If the "yes" wins, a new PMC needs to be created, overseeing the
releases of Xerces-J, Xerces-C and Xerces-P. Who would be
At 20.05 29/04/2004 +1000, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Any thoughts - not just from Xerces, but others as well? We have one
month to the board meeting where we need to say what we are doing in this
space.
We either need to make this happen (and thus recognise that
Xerces/Xalan/etc are already acti
Any thoughts - not just from Xerces, but others as well? We have one
month to the board meeting where we need to say what we are doing in
this space.
We either need to make this happen (and thus recognise that
Xerces/Xalan/etc are already acting as TLPs), or we need to look at how
the XML PMC
Peoples,
I have hacked around a board resolution for making Xerces a TLP.
It's actually the only thing needed to get things going. But to finish
it, a PMC and chair would need to be added in.
Tell me if I'm wasting my time :>. I'd very much like to get one or two
of these moving by the next bo
to
transform Xerces into a top-level project as a
AMmember of the "federation" of XML
projects
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/31/2004 09:28 Subject: Re: [VOTE]: motion to
transfor
EMAIL
PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
03/31/2004 01:02 Subject: Re: [VOTE]: motion to
transform Xerces into a top-level project as a
PMmember of the "fede
+1
On Mar 31, 2004, at 1:44 AM, Neil Graham wrote:
Hi all,
Throughout January and February, the idea [1] of converting the XML
project
into a "Federation" of projects was discussed. The reason for doing
this
is that the by-laws of the Apache Software Foundation make certain
assumptions
Hi all,
Throughout January and February, the idea [1] of converting the XML project
into a "Federation" of projects was discussed. The reason for doing this
is that the by-laws of the Apache Software Foundation make certain
assumptions about its structure, and the Board is concerned about ho
47 matches
Mail list logo
