reported our own memory
leakage problems!!! That is an excellent facility, though I have not used
it much recently!
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Don Mastrovito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 October 2001 17:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XercesC++ vs MSXML on Windows platform
working on it we had some build problems during last week. Hopefully it
can be ready sometime early next week. Stay tuned. :-)
Tinny
Herb Chong wrote:
> speaking of timely, when is next point version of Xerces due out? i'm still
> looking for the memory leak fixes and Borland C++Builder
speaking of timely, when is next point version of Xerces due out? i'm still
looking for the memory leak fixes and Borland C++Builder 5 support to be
part of an official release.
Herb...
David,
I had a similar experience with MSXML3/4. I originally used MSXML because
it was the native XML
David,
I had a similar experience with MSXML3/4. I originally used MSXML because
it was the native XML parser for windows and in many respects, provides
richer (more functional) APIs. However the memory leakage and deployment
problems caused me to seek other alternatives. With Xerces, the m
Hi all,
I'm using MSXML4 on a NT platform to parse and modify XML documents.
I'm testing my application and have memory problems. It seems that the
application doesn't release my object. If I execute my application many
successive times, I have no more memory avail
