Re: [XeTeX] fontspec vs polyglossia

2010-06-08 Thread François Charette
On 08/06/2010 15:21, Will Robertson wrote: Dear all, The recently released version 2 of fontspec now clashes with polyglossia, because the internals of fontspec have changed. polyglossia was previously hooking into low-level macros to perform what is now provided by a fontspec programming int

Re: [XeTeX] Embedding sounds in XeLaTeX

2010-06-08 Thread Nicholas Oettle
Many thanks for the advice - I'm looking forward to the new version of TeXLive! Nicholas -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex

[XeTeX] fontspec vs polyglossia

2010-06-08 Thread Will Robertson
Dear all, The recently released version 2 of fontspec now clashes with polyglossia, because the internals of fontspec have changed. polyglossia was previously hooking into low-level macros to perform what is now provided by a fontspec programming interface. (E.g., \fontspec_if_script:nTF {latn

Re: [XeTeX] [unimath] Unicode-math strange results

2010-06-08 Thread Apostolos Syropoulos
>Hi, >I tried it, and I'm still getting the same problems with plain xetex, >i.e. no big sizes of delimiters, no radical bar, nor fraction bar. Since I am using a different e-mail account to subscribe to the unicode-math list, I thought it would be a good idea to repost my findings here. Well,

Re: [XeTeX] Ligatures and searching in PDFs

2010-06-08 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Argh, this was not "off-list". Please accept my apologies, and also keep the information in this confidential. Philip Taylor Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: [Off-list] Have I told you that Thanh has created a Win-32 version of the modified PdfTeX [...]

Re: [XeTeX] Ligatures and searching in PDFs

2010-06-08 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
[Off-list] Have I told you that Thanh has created a Win-32 version of the modified PdfTeX, and after some (many !) trials and tribulations, I finally persuaded it to work within a TeXlive framework ? I am not yet certain that it is correct -- it seem to see rather more debugging output from proce