Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Will Robertson
On 2010-08-31 21:22:31 +0930, Shrisha Rao said: There is an interesting paper titled "If writers can't program and programm ers can't write, who's writing user documentation?" -- see http://portal.ac m.org/citation.cfm?id=10563.10574. Great link, thanks! Will --

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Will Robertson
On 2010-08-31 00:02:43 +0930, Heiko Oberdiek said: However it's quite incomplete, two examples: * \suppressfontnotfounderror is missing * For the correct syntax of \XeTeXpdffile I had to look into the sources of XeTeX. I've added \suppressfontnotfounderror to the source: http://github.c

Re: [XeTeX] Converting math symbols via xetex

2010-08-31 Thread Shrisha Rao
El sep 1, 2010, a las 6:56 a.m., Fr. Michael Gilmary escribió: > Herbert Schulz wrote: > > >> Putting together a rather trivial file based on the preamble that was given >> (well, I had to use the article class but everything else worked fine) > > > I have no idea what the llncs doc class is

Re: [XeTeX] Converting math symbols via xetex

2010-08-31 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
Herbert Schulz wrote: Putting together a rather trivial file based on the preamble that was given (well, I had to use the article class but everything else worked fine) I have no idea what the llncs doc class is either! and including both of the characters directly and via the math equi

Re: [XeTeX] Converting math symbols via xetex

2010-08-31 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Aug 31, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote: > Herbert Schulz wrote: > > >> Are you sure that Times has the $\neg$ symbol? >> > > > Well, what I can run here (MacTeX09), Times has ¬ and φ as well ... but they > don't get produced using the math mode $\neg$ and $\phi$. Below is

Re: [XeTeX] Converting math symbols via xetex

2010-08-31 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
Hi, Note the following: in latex, setting of mathematical material is __substantially__ different from "normal" text. For example, the Greek letter phi can be entered as φ into xelatex, but is then not treated as a 'special mathematical' symbol. Math symbols are grouped into several categories:

Re: [XeTeX] Change fonts for different environment/commands

2010-08-31 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
I think you will have to redefine all those parts of the environments dealing with fonts. Can you send a minimal example of what you want to achieve? In my case, \addfontfeature yields "undefined control sequence". There are many packages which already take care of these things for you, such as

Re: [XeTeX] Converting math symbols via xetex

2010-08-31 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Aug 31, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Neil wrote: > Sorry if this is a common question, I've searched high and low for the answer. > > I am writing a scientific paper with math terminology. It would be > nice to directly enter some math symbols directly into the > text-editor. For example, the characters

[XeTeX] Converting math symbols via xetex

2010-08-31 Thread Neil
Sorry if this is a common question, I've searched high and low for the answer. I am writing a scientific paper with math terminology. It would be nice to directly enter some math symbols directly into the text-editor. For example, the characters φ (lower case phi aka $\phi$) or ¬ (negation aka $\n

Re: [XeTeX] Another tipa/xunicode puzzle: interaction with array.sty?

2010-08-31 Thread Alan Munn
Hi Ross, thanks again for all your help on this. This makes things a lot clearer; I didn't really understand how xunicode worked, I guess. It might well be worth the effort to make a mapping file for tipa input after all. Thanks again. Alan On Aug 30, 2010, at 6:26 PM, Ross Moore wrote:

Re: [XeTeX] Change fonts for different environment/commands

2010-08-31 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 31.08.2010 um 11:31 schrieb Marcin Grotomirski: I want to set a different font for differnt environment. Re-write these environments. The fontspec documentation shows how to create a whole family of differently coloured fonts. -- Greetings Pete What is this talk of 'release?' Klin

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Gareth Hughes
Peter Baker wrote: > On 8/31/10 6:51 AM, Vafa Khalighi wrote: >> I believe that in any case the original developer should write the >> main documentation not anyone else simply because the original >> developer implemented the software and he knows absolutely every >> single detail about his softw

Re: [XeTeX] misplaced diacritical marks

2010-08-31 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:21:32AM -0400, Fr. Michael Gilmary wrote: > David J. Perry wrote: > > > >The following minimal example works for me (Windows, MiKTeX 2.7) > >with marks correctly placed. I happen to have the Unicode values > >for the diacritics memorized, so I just typed them in, but y

[XeTeX] Change fonts for different environment/commands

2010-08-31 Thread Marcin Grotomirski
Hey, I want to set a different font for differnt environment. Actually I'm interested in changing fonts in section titles, but also colour in footnotes. Should I use "\renewcommand"? I've tried it when changing colour globally for footnote, but xelatex compilation freezes. My sample: \renewcommand

Re: [XeTeX] misplaced diacritical marks

2010-08-31 Thread Fr. Michael Gilmary
David J. Perry wrote: The following minimal example works for me (Windows, MiKTeX 2.7) with marks correctly placed. I happen to have the Unicode values for the diacritics memorized, so I just typed them in, but you could equally well paste the actual characters from BabelMap or Character Vie

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
I guess it depends on the target audience. The Latex Companion is a good resource because it is written by experienced users, rather than maintainers of the packages. So I suppose we come to the point of "User Manual" and "Reference Manual". With all the tools available nowadays (doxygen, docstr

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Shrisha Rao
El ago 31, 2010, a las 4:43 p.m., Peter Baker escribió: > On 8/31/10 6:51 AM, Vafa Khalighi wrote: >> I believe that in any case the original developer should write the main >> documentation not anyone else simply because the original developer >> implemented the software and he knows absolutely

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Peter Baker wrote: But developers are not always good writers. Our Will Robertson has produced a great manual for fontspec, but some TeX developers who have written manuals would have done better to recruit someone else to do it for them. A developer's duty is to write well commented code, and

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Peter Baker
On 8/31/10 6:51 AM, Vafa Khalighi wrote: I believe that in any case the original developer should write the main documentation not anyone else simply because the original developer implemented the software and he knows absolutely every single detail about his software and what he has implemen

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Vafa Khalighi
I believe that in any case the original developer should write the main documentation not anyone else simply because the original developer implemented the software and he knows absolutely every single detail about his software and what he has implemented.

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX documentation? (from "Checking if a font exists")

2010-08-31 Thread Michiel Kamermans
Hi Wilfred, I know the missing-manual problem all too well (I work at a research lab)... I agree that it would be better if a developer (or developing team) releases a proper manual. But indeed the open source model is such that __anybody__ can write a manual if you really want to. And I f