I think that Jonathan has different kind of mapping in mind. First
macros are expanded (active characters will be expanded at the very
same time).
And expandable primitives (such as \if) will also
be expanded at this time.
Philip Taylor
--
S
2012/2/24 Ulrike Fischer :
> Am Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:25:37 + schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
>
>> I agree with that, that's the most sensible behaviour. What Ulrike
>> needs are hyphenation patterns suited to the particular transliteration
>> scheme she's using.
>
> I "need" nothing ;-). I even can
Am Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:25:37 + schrieb Arthur Reutenauer:
> I agree with that, that’s the most sensible behaviour. What Ulrike
> needs are hyphenation patterns suited to the particular transliteration
> scheme she’s using.
I "need" nothing ;-). I even can't read russian (and I hope the text
2012/2/24 Arthur Reutenauer :
>> It should be so.
>
> I agree with that, that’s the most sensible behaviour. What Ulrike
> needs are hyphenation patterns suited to the particular transliteration
> scheme she’s using. Depending on the transliteration, the patterns for
> other Slavonic languages c
> It should be so.
I agree with that, that’s the most sensible behaviour. What Ulrike
needs are hyphenation patterns suited to the particular transliteration
scheme she’s using. Depending on the transliteration, the patterns for
other Slavonic languages could be useful; for ISO 9, I expect tha
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 02:22:15PM +0100, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> Am Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:40:53 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
>
> >> From an old discussion on the mailing list
> >> (http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2005-November/002842.html) I got
> >> the impression that mappings are "invisible"
2012/2/24 Ulrike Fischer :
> Am Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:40:53 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
>
>>> From an old discussion on the mailing list
>>> (http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2005-November/002842.html) I got
>>> the impression that mappings are "invisible" to the hyphenation
>>> routine and so I w
Am Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:40:53 +0100 schrieb Zdenek Wagner:
>> From an old discussion on the mailing list
>> (http://tug.org/mailman/htdig/xetex/2005-November/002842.html) I got
>> the impression that mappings are "invisible" to the hyphenation
>> routine and so I would have expected the translitter
2012/2/24 Arthur Reutenauer :
> I don’t know the technical answer to that question, but considering
> what you say:
>
>> I would have expected the translittered text to be
>> hyphenated according the original russian rules but actually it is
>> not hyphenated at all:
>
> That hints
I don’t know the technical answer to that question, but considering
what you say:
>I would have expected the translittered text to be
> hyphenated according the original russian rules but actually it is
> not hyphenated at all:
That hints that the text is hyphenated after tran
2012/2/24 Ulrike Fischer :
>
> In tex.stackexchange there is currently a discussion about the
> hyphenation of text "translittered" with the help of a mapping file.
> http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/45570/using-xetex-for-automatic-transliteration-of-cyrillic-letters
>
> >From an old discussi
In tex.stackexchange there is currently a discussion about the
hyphenation of text "translittered" with the help of a mapping file.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/45570/using-xetex-for-automatic-transliteration-of-cyrillic-letters
>From an old discussion on the mailing list
(http://tug.or
12 matches
Mail list logo
