- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Tobias Schoel liesdieda...@googlemail.com
An: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms xetex@tug.org
Gesendet: Montag, den 22. November 2010, 7:18:19 Uhr
Betreff: [XeTeX] accent circumflex with unicode-math
The accents have different width. This
Am 18.10.2010 um 19:21 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:00:24PM +0200, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
Hi Will, Khaled and others,
as Ulrike Fischer has noticed
(http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2010-October/018895.html), fontspec
enters in a loop italics are defined as slanted:
Am 05.10.2010 um 11:59 schrieb Nikos Platis:
Consider the following minimal file:
---
\documentclass[a4paper,10pt]{article}
\usepackage{fontspec}
\setmainfont{Candara}
\begin{document}
ά Ά έ Έ ή Ή ί Ί ϊ Ϊ ΐ ό Ό ύ Ύ ϋ Ϋ ΰ ώ Ώ
\end{document}
---
Using a fully updated
Am 03.10.2010 um 10:07 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
Am 02.10.2010 um 17:02 schrieb Drébon:
Now, I am just searching for a replacement police for helvet that support
smallcaps (and to understand what was I intending to do with the problematic
\renewcommand*\sfdefault{ugq})
This should
Am 03.10.2010 um 14:02 schrieb David Perry:
Heiko,
Thank you for the reply.
On 10/3/2010 4:41 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:
This is correct. XeTeX is used to generate PDF, `hypertex' is
a driver for DVI mode. You can easily omit the option, because
XeTeX is automatically detected.
If I
Am 03.10.2010 um 15:52 schrieb Will Robertson:
(Sent quickly. Please excuse brevity.)
On 03/10/2010, at 11:41 PM, Philipp Stephani st_phil...@yahoo.de wrote:
Am 03.10.2010 um 14:02 schrieb David Perry:
If I omit the option, or use 'xetex' in place of 'hypertex' or use
Am 01.10.2010 um 08:25 schrieb Tobias Schoel:
Hi,
of course, any document has structure and formatting, even plain txt-files
have. That's not the point. The point I made, and you wrote it yourself:
- In TeX you explicitly state the structure/format.
In TeX you cannot state the structure
Am 01.10.2010 um 00:49 schrieb Elliott Roper:
As far a documentation is concerned look at the LaTeX Companion for packages.
..and that's where I get a bit taken aback. The book arrives last Saturday. I
head for the Index for the bits I really need.
XeTeX - nada
fontspec - zip
Unicode -
Am 01.10.2010 um 00:14 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
Am 30.09.2010 um 00:42 schrieb Alan Munn:
And I deal with a broad range of students at a major US research university.
U.S. American students are not a gauge for Earth's youth.
I didn't talk about American students. What I described was
Am 30.09.2010 um 20:12 schrieb Elliott Roper:
What I'm lacking is a set of beginner documents that ties all the TeX zoo
together. Do I have to read source to find the definitive answer to which
package has what package as a pre-requisite?
Yes, and that won't change until LaTeX becomes a
Am 30.09.2010 um 17:33 schrieb Axel Kielhorn:
The attractiveness to using LaTeX to exchange documents (in the past,
and to a large extent, even now) is that you can be sure that the
source file can be read by your computer, even if you don't have the
same fonts or language support (EOL and
Am 30.09.2010 um 16:01 schrieb Keith J. Schultz:
With Tex et al. the structure/formatting commands are in document verbatim.
When using TeX et al. you are more aware of what you are doing
I don't know if that is really true. It's relatively easy to find out the
current style of a
Am 02.10.2010 um 21:52 schrieb Paul Isambert:
Le 02/10/2010 21:22, Alan Munn a écrit :
On Oct 2, 2010, at 2:47 PM, Philipp Stephani wrote:
Am 30.09.2010 um 09:36 schrieb Tobias Schoel:
Hi,
there are three kinds of people who should learn TeXCo:
- those who absolutely need TeX
Am 29.09.2010 um 21:26 schrieb Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd):
Tobias Schoel wrote:
I wouldn't recommend anything other than kile for linux users. for me it
offers the fastest way of texing.
I tried emacs when we got the task of learning and testing a bit of lisp
in university,
Am 28.09.2010 um 02:20 schrieb David J. Perry:
As a relative newcomer to Xe(La)TeX, and proponent of Unicode and
multilingual computing for 15+ years, I was very surprised by the lack of
Unicode support in the TeX world. I think what lshort and other tutorials
need is a very clear and
Am 28.09.2010 um 21:16 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
Am 28.09.2010 um 16:20 schrieb Tobias Schoel:
Can we now come back to the beginning problem:
Which way of creating unicode-encoded .tex-documents to propose in lshort?
Using GNU Emacs 23.x – the Unicode Emacs (and any of its variants) – with
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Axel Kielhorn a.kielh...@web.de
An: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms xetex@tug.org
Gesendet: Montag, den 27. September 2010, 16:45:18 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX in lshort
Am 26.09.2010 um 19:11 schrieb Michiel Kamermans:
- Ursprüngliche Mail
Von: Axel Kielhorn a.kielh...@web.de
An: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms xetex@tug.org
Gesendet: Montag, den 27. September 2010, 16:46:00 Uhr
Betreff: Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX in lshort
Am 26.09.2010 um 18:10 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
Am
Am 26.09.2010 um 06:13 schrieb David Perry:
Some editors, _mainly on Linux,_ support digraphs, two letters that are
combined into one [not on] character. The compose function is hardly ever
used on OS X or Windows;
He doesn't refer to the Compose key, but to editor support, which is
Am 26.09.2010 um 15:56 schrieb Axel Kielhorn:
Is the compose feature you mention the same as dead keys?
No. Compose is a key available only from the X Window System. After hitting
Compose (it is not a modifier key), you can enter a known key sequence to get a
non-ASCII character; e.g.,
Am 26.09.2010 um 15:56 schrieb Axel Kielhorn:
Some operating systems or application offer input systems or input
methods which allow to enter non-standard characters.
XeTeX also supports UTF-16 encodings. \XeTeXdefaultencoding{CharsetName} and
\XeTeXinputencoding{CharsetName} can set many
Am 26.09.2010 um 16:44 schrieb David Perry:
On a Mac I can type \texttt{option-u u} to get an ü
Mac OS has the best systemwide support for non-English characters, and has
for a long time. Windows provides only a very awkward ALT key method that
requires typing decimal or hex numbers.
This
Am 27.09.2010 um 01:16 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Abstract: lshort needs a chapter/section about Unicode on its own.
From what I experience here, a lot of TeX users are so brain-washed to
use \v{c} and alike
Well: this is the official way to enter the character č, as described in
lshort.pdf, p.
Am 14.09.2010 um 16:44 schrieb Joel C. Salomon:
I’ve not been following the recent back-and-forth regarding which
XɘLaTeX packages are now obsolete, and which are compatible with LuaLaTeX.
Right now my personal style files files have lines like these:
\ifxetex
Am 12.09.2010 um 04:12 schrieb Will Robertson:
On 2010-09-12 05:11:54 +0930, Philipp Stephani st_phil...@yahoo.de said:
OpenType Math is still in a very early stage in XeTeX and has so many bugs
that it is not ready for production use.
Thanks for the vote of confidence.
Unfortunately
Am 12.09.2010 um 10:22 schrieb Apostolos Syropoulos:
greatly diminished. OpenType Math is still in a very early stage in XeTeX
and
has so many bugs that it is not ready for production use.
I think this is a wrong statement: OpenType Math is by itself in early stage.
Only
two-three
Am 10.09.2010 um 19:24 schrieb Michiel Kamermans:
and I personally jumped straight into xelatex because the internet told me it
was the only unicode-aware flavour of TeX
That is not correct, LuaTeX is Unicode-based as well.
making the choice ridiculously easy.
It's not at all ridiculously
Am 11.09.2010 um 20:27 schrieb Michiel Kamermans:
Hi Philipp,
and I personally jumped straight into xelatex because the internet told me
it was the only unicode-aware flavour of TeX
That is not correct, LuaTeX is Unicode-based as well.
Sure, but LuaTeX wasn't around five years
Am 08.09.2010 um 08:46 schrieb Wilfred van Rooijen:
Hi all,
But why ? What exactly do you dislike about the use
of
sans serif for headings ? To my mind, and in a
scientific
as opposed to artistic context, sans serif headings with
serif prose seem absolutely normal and fine.
The
Am 17.08.2010 um 10:31 schrieb Peter Dyballa:
Has Thunderbird a way to send a message to this list without usurping an
existing thread?
Posting a new message (without using the answer function) to xetex@tug.org
should start a new thread.
--
Am 01.08.2010 um 09:28 schrieb Ron Aaron:
On Sunday 01 August 2010 10:16:27 Paul Isambert wrote:
Indeed, the \mark won't end up on the main vertical list. In the latest
TUGboat issue, Hans Hagen writes about this and proposes a nice
solution... but with LuaTeX!
Hmm. I really need
Am 20.03.2010 um 00:41 schrieb Peter Baker:
Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 20.03.2010 um 00:13 schrieb David Perry:
When I started learning TeX, I could find only one editor, TeXworks, that
was Unicode-aware. And that is still the case, although I see that
TeXnicCenter has now rolled out an
32 matches
Mail list logo
