On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Herbert Schulz wrote:
> The \chapter command is part of the book class and is designed that way ...
> If you don't want it that way (after all it's a design decision) you redefine
> the \chapter command.
2011/12/3 Zdenek Wagner :
> The problem with plain page styl
2011/12/3 Daniel Greenhoe :
> Thank you for your fast reply.
>
> 2011/12/3 Zdenek Wagner :
>> It is described in LaTeX documentation that \chapter
>> contains implicitely \thispagestyle{plain}
>
> Then isn't this a bug with LaTeX's \chapter command? For example, this
> has the same problem (no fanc
On Dec 3, 2011, at 7:02 AM, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
> Thank you for your fast reply.
>
> 2011/12/3 Zdenek Wagner :
>> It is described in LaTeX documentation that \chapter
>> contains implicitely \thispagestyle{plain}
>
> Then isn't this a bug with LaTeX's \chapter command? For example, this
> ha
Thank you for your fast reply.
2011/12/3 Zdenek Wagner :
> It is described in LaTeX documentation that \chapter
> contains implicitely \thispagestyle{plain}
Then isn't this a bug with LaTeX's \chapter command? For example, this
has the same problem (no fancychap, no fancyhdr):
\documentclass{boo
2011/12/3 Daniel Greenhoe :
> When using the fancychap package with the "Glenn" option and *no
> footer*, there seems to be a minor problem:
> When starting a new chapter, the package still attempts to put a page
> number in the footer even though there is supposed to be no footer.
>
> Besides the
When using the fancychap package with the "Glenn" option and *no
footer*, there seems to be a minor problem:
When starting a new chapter, the package still attempts to put a page
number in the footer even though there is supposed to be no footer.
Besides the brute-force solution of placing "\thisp
