Re: Added Pseudocolor Visuals for XFree86?

2004-11-02 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Bussoletti, John E wrote: Examination of the output of xdpyinfo in the SGI machines shows that the SGI X drivers support Pseudocolor visuals at both 8 bit planes and 12 bit planes. Similar output under Linux shows support for Pseudocolor Visuals at only 8 bit planes.

You can start saving now

2004-11-02 Thread Carter Samuel
Good Day, Your Application has been Pre-Approved on Tuesday, November 2nd 2004. Your MRG. process is ready for rates starting at 2.85% Fixed. Please use our secure site to fill-out your application. http://VVPU.semperbene.net/azber Sincerely, Carter Samuel http://SOTS.semperbene.net

Re: Added Pseudocolor Visuals for XFree86?

2004-11-02 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Bussoletti, John E wrote: At Boeing we have a number of graphics applications that have been developed in-house, originally for various SGI platforms. These applications are used for engineering visualization They work well on the native hardware and even display well

Re: Added Pseudocolor Visuals for XFree86?

2004-11-02 Thread Tim Roberts
Mark Vojkovich wrote: ...Some hardware support 8 bit PseudoColor overlays now but I expect this to go the way of the dodo. My impression is that a future Microsoft operating system will not support 8 bit PseudoColor modes nor will it support overlays so eventually these will disappear from the

[Fonts] Fw: descriptive

2004-11-02 Thread Matilda Franco
I had this sent to me - thought you might get a kick out of it. http://www.sunsetdownloads.com/info.html You can download dvd movies, full cd albums and stuff. Even console video games. I managed to download 9 CD's so far. You're going to pass out when you see how many movies and games and

Re: [XFree86] x server problem

2004-11-02 Thread Mark Vojkovich
You have an incomplete XFree86 installation. It is missing modules. Specifically it is missing at least /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a Mark. On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, aleem bagwan wrote: hi, i have a problem with gui.it isnt getting loaded. along with is

[XFree86] lost serial characters

2004-11-02 Thread kurt emmerich
I hope this is the right place to ask - if not I apologize- would someone please point me in the right direction? I'm running Fedora1 on a 400MHz Pentium 2. Runs great, no problem, except when using the KDE or GNOME desktop. When receiving serial data ( /dev/ttyS0) 115200,8,n,1, I'm losing

[XFree86] lost serial characters

2004-11-02 Thread kurt emmerich
I hope this is the right place to ask - if not I apologize- would someone please point me in the right direction? I'm running Fedora1 on a 400MHz Pentium 2. Runs great, no problem, except when using the KDE or GNOME desktop. When receiving serial data ( /dev/ttyS0) 115200,8,n,1, I'm losing

[XFree86] X on embedded Systems

2004-11-02 Thread Michael Hamilton
Can you make any suggestions on making X start up faster (or appear to) on an embedded system? I have already tried tweaking the font situation (loading them with fontpath rather than the font server). Is it possible to preload X somehow before the UI comes up, perhaps early in system startup or

Re: [XFree86] X on embedded Systems

2004-11-02 Thread Mark Vojkovich
Is starting X a performance problem for you? Without a window manager it's only takes a second for XFree86 to start over here. I thought this was fairly quick already. Mark. On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Michael Hamilton wrote: Can you make any suggestions on making X start

Re: [XFree86] lost serial characters

2004-11-02 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, kurt emmerich wrote: I hope this is the right place to ask - if not I apologize- would someone please point me in the right direction? I'm running Fedora 1 on a 400MHz Pentium 2. Runs great, no problem, except when using the KDE or GNOME desktop. When receiving serial

RE: [XFree86] X on embedded Systems

2004-11-02 Thread Michael Hamilton
We use twm as our windows manager and X starts up and the X sits there for ages before an xterm or anything can start up. It's about 10 seconds (consistently). -Original Message- From: Mark Vojkovich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 4:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [XFree86] X on embedded Systems

2004-11-02 Thread Mark Vojkovich
Are you using startx? If so, is it faster when running XFree86 directly without any clients? I can't recall ever seeing X start up so slowly. How fast is this CPU? Does this system have a disk drive? If so, are you using DMA? My first instinct would be that this is a disk problem or