[XFree86] Help needed with "Maximum clients" message

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Williams
Hi! I'm running XFree86 4.3.0 on Slackware 9 w/ 2.4.21-ac4 kernel, gcc-3.3, and glibc-2.3.2. XFree86 runs fine at 1280x1024 resolution. Recently, I've been running into problems starting X clients and I get this message printed to stdout (when I run the client from a shell window): Xlib: connec

Re: [XFree86] Help needed with "Maximum clients" message

2003-07-02 Thread Tom Williams
Mark Vojkovich wrote: >You've got alot of X clients. I've got an app at: > > http://www.xfree86.org/~mvojkovi/restest.c > > that you can run to print out how many clients there are and > what resources they are using. BE CAREFUL, you want to run > the app like "restest >& outfile" because

Re: [XFree86] problem in displaying 8-bit fonts

2003-07-06 Thread Tom Williams
Is the use of "ttmkfdir" still needed for TrueType font configuration with XFRee86 4.3.0? ttmkfdir isn't mentioned in the current online doc for installing TrueType fonts: http://www.xfree86.org/~dawes/4.3.0/fonts2.html#9 Thanks... Peace... Tom COLIN Stephane wrote: > Hi Prasad ! > > To be a

Re: [XFree86] problem in displaying 8-bit fonts

2003-07-06 Thread Tom Williams
7;t help, it is > quite possible that you are trying to use a font in a format that is not > supported by your server. > > Hope this help ... > > A++ > > Tom Williams wrote: > > Is the use of "ttmkfdir" still needed for TrueType font configuration with > > XFR

[XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.0 RC1

2005-02-12 Thread Tom Williams
Hi! I've just installed XFree86 4.5.0 RC1 on my Slackware 8 based Linux system and so far it's running great! :) I tried running Gimp 2.2.3 and it complained about the fontconfig library being too old. I had fontconfig 2.2.x installed before installing XFree86 4.5.0 RC1 and it seems the XFre

[XFree86] Segmentation fault when running XFree86 -configure in XFree86 4.5.0 RC1

2005-02-20 Thread Tom Williams
When I try to use XFree86 -configure to configure my X settings, it seg faults: --START [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# gdb --args /usr/X11R6/bin/XFree86 -configure :2 GNU gdb 6.2.1 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General P

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.5.0 RC2 (4.4.99.902) doesn't compile

2005-02-22 Thread Tom Williams
I tried building XFree86 4.5.0 RC2 from source and ran into the compile problem below: START- gcc -m32 -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes-Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.5.0 RC2 (4.4.99.902) doesn't compile

2005-02-22 Thread Tom Williams
Tom Williams wrote: I tried building XFree86 4.5.0 RC2 from source and ran into the compile problem below: START- gcc -m32 -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -fno-strict-aliasing -ansi -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes

[XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.0 RC2 and XFree86 4.4.0 XF86Config files

2005-02-22 Thread Tom Williams
Hi! Ok, I'm now running XFree86 4.5.0 RC2 woo-hoo! :) I ran "XFree86 -configure" and it sniffed out my display gear and created a XF86Config.new file. I tried it out and find I like the manually tweaked settings in my XFree86 4.4.0 XF86Config file better (I run at a higher resolution than wha

[XFree86] Discrepancy in "autoconfig" vs "configure" command line options in XFree86 4.5.0 RC2

2005-02-23 Thread Tom Williams
Ok, when I read the man pages on XFree86 (man XFree86), the "-configure" option is described: -configure When this option is specified, the XFree86 server loads all video driver modules, probes for available hardware, and writes out an initial XF86Config(5x) file based on what was detected. T

Re: [XFree86] Discrepancy in "autoconfig" vs "configure" command line options in XFree86 4.5.0 RC2

2005-02-24 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: The '-configure' option is listed if you are root when you do that. The root-only options are not listed when you are not root. (snip) I understand now. Thanks for the info. :) Peace... Tom ___ XFree86 mailing list XFree86@XFree86.Or

[XFree86] Question about Dell E771a monitor and XFree86 4.5.0 video modes

2006-02-06 Thread Tom Williams
Hi! I´ve been running XFree86 4.5.0 on my Linux system since it was first release without problems. I replaced an old Nec XE17 monitor with a Dell E771a this morning and I can no longer get X to start in [EMAIL PROTECTED] resolution. It will crank up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I believe) max. I trie

Re: [XFree86] Question about Dell E771a monitor and XFree86 4.5.0 video modes

2006-02-07 Thread Tom Williams
Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006, Tom Williams wrote: > >> Hi! I´ve been running XFree86 4.5.0 on my Linux system since it was >> first release without problems. I replaced an old Nec XE17 monitor with >> a Dell E771a this morning and I can no longer get

Re: [XFree86] Release date for 4.6?

2006-02-23 Thread Tom Williams
Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Maluvia wrote: > >> I have been using Xfree86 because of its continued support for TinyX. >> I have tried compiling a recent snapshot, but got errors and the >> compile failed -so just decided to wait for the next official >> release, which brings

Re: [XFree86] Release date for 4.6?

2006-02-23 Thread Tom Williams
Marc Aurele La France wrote: >> worked fine but the installation failed with an "invalid group utmp" >> error when xterm was begin installed. At this point, I think I'm >> running a half 4.5.99.21/4.5.0 XFree86 installation on Linux. :) > Attached is my XFree86.0.log after the failed installation

[XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-08 Thread Tom Williams
Hi! I just installed the XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot (which fixed my xterm installation problem, thanks guys! :)) and it runs fine. I wanted to try the "-autoconfig" option to see what it would do and it generated these messages: Required symbol fbdevHWLoadPalette from module /usr/X11R6/lib/mod

Re: [XFree86] Release date for 4.6?

2006-03-08 Thread Tom Williams
Tom Williams wrote: > Marc Aurele La France wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Maluvia wrote: >> >> >>> I have been using Xfree86 because of its continued support for TinyX. >>> I have tried compiling a recent snapshot, but got errors and the >&

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-08 Thread Tom Williams
Mark Vojkovich wrote: >It would appear as though -autoconfig is broken. Can you > do -configure instead? It used to be able to generate a working > config file. > > Mark. > Will do and I'll report my findings here. :) Peace... Tom __

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-08 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:54:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:23:17AM -0800, Tom Williams wrote: >> >>> Hi! I just installed the XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot (which fixed my >>> xterm installation pr

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-08 Thread Tom Williams
Mark Vojkovich wrote: >It would appear as though -autoconfig is broken. Can you > do -configure instead? It used to be able to generate a working > config file. > > Mark. > Ok, that worked just fine, using the original, unpatched XFree86 code. The attached XF86Config.

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-09 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:54:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 08:23:17AM -0800, Tom Williams wrote: >> >>> Hi! I just installed the XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot (which fixed my >>> xterm installation pr

[XFree86] XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot problem

2006-03-12 Thread Tom Williams
I've been running XFree86 4.5.99.901 since it came out and it's been running well, except for today when I pressed Ctrl+Alt+F7, in an attempt to switch to the console on tty7. When I pressed Ctrl+Alt+F7, X seemed to crash. The video got all garbled and no key sequence I press did anything (Ctrl+Al

Re: [XFree86] XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot problem

2006-03-12 Thread Tom Williams
Tom Williams wrote: > I've been running XFree86 4.5.99.901 since it came out and it's been > running well, except for today when I pressed Ctrl+Alt+F7, in an attempt > to switch to the console on tty7. When I pressed Ctrl+Alt+F7, X seemed > to crash. The video got all garbl

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-16 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 07:53:41AM -0800, Tom Williams wrote: > >> David Dawes wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 05:54:02PM -0500, David Dawes wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-16 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: >> Sounds good! Are you aware of this issue I posted about a few days ago: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/xfree86@xfree86.org/msg20133.html >> > > I haven't been able to reproduce this. It might be specific to the > driver/hardware. Is it something that you can reproduce r

Re: [XFree86] Question about XFree86 4.5.99.901 snapshot

2006-03-20 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: > Can you exit the server normally, without this problem? Yep. > Does it happen > every time you attempt to switch to another terminal? I believe so, but it seems to happen when I issue the Ctrl-Alt-F7 key sequence. Other Ctrl-Alt-Fn keysequences (like Ctrl-Alt-F3) do nothing.

Re: [XFree86] Second 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-03-21 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: > The second release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available. > The source tarball can be found at: > > ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.902.tar.bz2 > > This version marks the beginning of the intensive testing phase for this > release. Please r

Re: [XFree86] Second 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-03-21 Thread Tom Williams
Marc Aurele La France wrote: >> gcc-4.1.0, and glibc-2.3.4. Looks like the 2.6.16 kernel changed >> "unsigned long" types in the "input_device_id" struct to >> kernel_ulong_t. I don't know if the XFree86 source needs to be tweaked >> any to build against a 2.6.16 kernel, but I'm making everyone a

Re: [XFree86] Second 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-03-22 Thread Tom Williams
Marc Aurele La France wrote: >> Thanks for the link to the thread. So, I guess the patch submitted by >> the thread starter was rejected? > > Yes, it was. Kernel headers have been gradually breaking for a _very_ > long time, WRT their #include'ing by userland apps. Instead of > changing the kern

Re: [XFree86] Second 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-03-23 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: > The second release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available. > The source tarball can be found at: > > ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/develsnaps/XFree86-4.5.99.902.tar.bz2 > > This version marks the beginning of the intensive testing phase for this > release. Please r

Re: [XFree86] Second 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-03-24 Thread Tom Williams
Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006, Tom Williams wrote: > >> David Dawes wrote: >>> The second release candidate for XFree86 4.6.0 is now available. >>> The source tarball can be found at: > >>> >>> ftp://ftp.xfree86.or

Re: [XFree86] Fourth XFree86 4.6.0 release candidate

2006-04-24 Thread Tom Williams
David Dawes wrote: Please report problems/success, etc here, and send me any documentation updates that you may have. Successful installation here (Slackware 8 based Linux system w/ 2.6.16.9 kernel, glibc-2.4, gcc-20060414). :) Peace... Tom ___ XFre