Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
The *analog* signal (speak: DVI-A) is (partly) transferred on the extra
pins, outside of this 8x3 block. There are (up to) four pins in a
square, with a ~2mm wide "key" pin in the middle. If these pins around
the key pi
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > Thanks for clarifying. On my other G550 I have a 1600x1024 monitor on what
> > appears to be a single-link cable. If I switch from DVI-digital to
> > DVI-analog *on the monitor* the picture goes away, so I was get
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
Thanks for clarifying. On my other G550 I have a 1600x1024 monitor on what
appears to be a single-link cable. If I switch from DVI-digital to
DVI-analog *on the monitor* the picture goes away, so I was getting
very confused.
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a 108MHz clo
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Thomas Winischhofer wrote:
> Ken Marx wrote:
> > Right. Veit also pointed out this limitation. Perhaps it's
> > *doable*, but just isn't supported? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > claims to have it working under linux; I know I have 1600x1200
> > working on 4.2.1 (Freebsd-4.7) for b
Ken Marx wrote:
> Right. Veit also pointed out this limitation. Perhaps it's
> *doable*, but just isn't supported? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> claims to have it working under linux; I know I have 1600x1200
> working on 4.2.1 (Freebsd-4.7) for both the G400/550 on a
> the viewsonic vp230mb (at 56hz v-refres
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Ken Marx wrote:
> p.s. Re: Veit's question about 60hz vs 56hz: I'm sure.
> I went and double checked: at 60Hz I get a blank screen
> for 1600x1200 and see this in the log:
>
> (WW) (1600x1200,ViewSonic LCD-23) mode clock 162MHz exceeds DDC maximum 160MHz
>
> This even with
Right. Veit also pointed out this limitation. Perhaps it's
*doable*, but just isn't supported? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
claims to have it working under linux; I know I have 1600x1200
working on 4.2.1 (Freebsd-4.7) for both the G400/550 on a
the viewsonic vp230mb (at 56hz v-refresh).
The monitor reports it
According to the Matrox website
(http://www.matrox.com/mga/products/tech_info/g550_factsheet.cfm) the
G550 can only do up to 1280x1024 via *digital* DVI, 1600x1200 via
*analog* DVI. (1280x1024 is the limit for all "single-link" cards/output
devices. Resolutions above this require a "dual link"
Hi Ken!
Am Die, 2003-03-18 um 00.08 schrieb Ken Marx:
> (Just fyi - I got both a g550, and a g400 to work
> at 1600x1200 in DVI on a viewSonic vp230mb.
> I had to clock the refresh rate down to 56hz
> from 60hz. Ignorance was bliss there, I guess.)
I am sure I tried this - my ViewSonic VX2000 d
Brilliant! That saves me some time. Thanks very much.
(Just fyi - I got both a g550, and a g400 to work
at 1600x1200 in DVI on a viewSonic vp230mb.
I had to clock the refresh rate down to 56hz
from 60hz. Ignorance was bliss there, I guess.)
Before I go and try the Ti4200, I might as well ask
if
Yes, people need to be aware that having a DVI connector alone
isn't enough to ensure that you can run a particular panel. While
many cards boast high analog pixel clocks, TMDS clocks are quite a
different matter. High bandwidth TMDS controllers are complicated
to make and are typically not a
Hi!
I ran into the same trap - but sometimes it worked but was very "snowy".
I was shocked when I read that G550 simply does not support DVI-D at
this resolution:
DVI output
* Supports cutting-edge digital flat panels with resolutions up to
1280 x 1024 (main display)
(http://www.matrox.com/
12 matches
Mail list logo
