-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Patrick Mast, xHarbour." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "xHarbour-Developers"
Data invio: sabato 29 novembre 2008 8.16
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Next release version number.
> Hello,
>
> Ok, seems like we have an agreemen
Hello,
Ok, seems like we have an agreement to release 1.2.0.
First thing we need to to is create a 1.2.0 branch so Eduardo can make
his changes to that branche.
Enrico, can give us instructions to upload the new binaries? And a
list of which binaries needs to be build?
Thanks!
Patrick
I am agree, can create opensuse 10.3 & 11.0 after saturday,
regards,
Marcelo Anelli C. o^o¬
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Thursday 27 November 2008 05:43:37 Patrick Mast, xHarbour. escribió:
> Jose,
>
> >> Same here. I use 1.2.0 for production and it works fine here. That's
> >> why I wanted to RELEASE t
xHarbour. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Assunto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Next release version number.
> Para: "xHarbour-Developers"
> Data: Quinta-feira, 27 de Novembro de 2008, 8:13
> Jose,
>
> >> Same here. I use 1.2.0 for production and it works
> fine here.
I am agree, can create opensuse 10.3 & 11.0 after saturday,
regards,
Marcelo Anelli C. o^o¬
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
El Thursday 27 November 2008 05:43:37 Patrick Mast, xHarbour. escribió:
> Jose,
>
> >> Same here. I use 1.2.0 for production and it works fine here. That's
> >> why I wanted to RELEASE t
Jose,
>> Same here. I use 1.2.0 for production and it works fine here. That's
>> why I wanted to RELEASE that CVS version so we have the time to work
>> onto the next version. No time pressure after we released.
> I fully agree. There is so much time since the last 'officially' release,
> and sin
Patrick,
> Same here. I use 1.2.0 for production and it works fine here. That's
> why I wanted to RELEASE that CVS version so we have the time to work
> onto the next version. No time pressure after we released.
I fully agree. There is so much time since the last 'officially' release,
and since
Jose,
>> The current CVS HEAD (1.2.0) is still unstable for release, so I think
>> we will wait many time until stabilize at release stage.
> Current CVS "HEAD" could be unstable, but "branch-1-2-0" (which is not
> "HEAD") is perfectly usable. I'm using it in production without any known
> proble
Eduardo,
> The current CVS HEAD (1.2.0) is still unstable for release, so I think
> we will wait many time until stabilize at release stage.
Current CVS "HEAD" could be unstable, but "branch-1-2-0" (which is not
"HEAD") is perfectly usable. I'm using it in production without any known
problem.
e: [xHarbour-developers] Next release version number.
> Para: "xHarbour-Developers"
> Data: Quarta-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2008, 8:04
> Hello,
>
> 2007-11-01 10:09 UTC+0300 Phil Krylov newstar.rinet.ru>
> * include/hbver.h
> * Changed CVS HEAD version
Hello,
2007-11-01 10:09 UTC+0300 Phil Krylov
* include/hbver.h
* Changed CVS HEAD version number to 1.1.0.
This is why I increased it to 1.2.0
Patrick
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Develope
, Andi Jahja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> De: Andi Jahja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Assunto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Next release version number.
> Para: "Xharbour-Developers List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 25 de Novembro de 2008, 10:45
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 02:44:45 -0800 (PST)
Eduardo Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm confuse about next xharbour version number.
>
> Since 2007/NOV we was working on 1.1.0 (cvs), after 2008/OCT Patrick has
> changed to 1.2.0, before release the 1.1.0 version. We will jump from 1.0.0
> to
I'm confuse about next xharbour version number.
Since 2007/NOV we was working on 1.1.0 (cvs), after 2008/OCT Patrick has
changed to 1.2.0, before release the 1.1.0 version. We will jump from 1.0.0 to
1.2.0 ?
regards,
Eduardo
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http
14 matches
Mail list logo
