On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
>> Now hb_xgrab/hb_xrealloc allocates unused memory when
>> HB_FM_STATISTICS is not defined.
> Please can you be more explicit please?
> thank's
> I don't found any incorrect by the moment
void * hb_xgrab( ULONG ulSize )
{
PHB_MEMINFO pMem
In all cases heap function are quicker than local ones.
We are always speaking of windows platforms. MSDN explain
then Local* functions will be replaced for Heap* for this
reason.
you can read this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366723(VS.85).aspx
Note: The local functions have gre
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Miguel Angel Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Ron Pinkas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour developer list"
Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 13.41
>
> Now hb_xgrab/hb_xrealloc allocates unused memory when
> HB_FM_STATISTICS is not defined.
>
Please can you be more explicit please?
thank's
I don't found any incorrect by the moment
Best regards,
Miguel Angel Marchuet
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Miguel Angel Marchuet wrote:
> I remove some structure variables, not used when profile is not active.
> it increases speed.
> more later it was added altogether for blackguard compatibility with 3rd party
> libraries. THEN return to be slow altogether.
> if you don't use fmsta
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 13:41:19 +0100
Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> speed changes from 100s to 30s.
30s? I never reach that speed. "Heaps" works slower than "malloc" in my
case (?). ANyway, can you please post the full report of speedtst.exe?
--
Andi
-
" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Miguel Angel
> Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour developer list"
>
> Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 4.47
> Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Slowness
>
>
>> Do we have any tests known to be slower t
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Ron Pinkas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Miguel Angel
Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour developer list"
Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 4.47
Ogge
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Ron Pinkas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Miguel Angel
Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour developer list"
Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 4.47
Ogge
few months
> ago?
>
> Ron
>
> --
> From: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 4:02 AM
> To: "Miguel Angel Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour
> developer list"
> Subject:
On Fri, 28 Nov 2008 12:42:11 +0700
Andi Jahja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:47:59 -0800
> Ron Pinkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But WHY is it slower now?
> >
> > I don't want to HIDE thinking that we CAN make it faster, I want to know
> > what did we CHANGE to make i
On Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:47:59 -0800
Ron Pinkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But WHY is it slower now?
>
> I don't want to HIDE thinking that we CAN make it faster, I want to know
> what did we CHANGE to make it SLOWER?
>
> Is it true? Do we have any tests known to be slower than say few months a
rico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2008 4:02 AM
To: "Miguel Angel Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour developer
list"
Subject: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Slowness
>
> -Messaggio Originale-
> Da: "
huet"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour
> developer list"
> Data invio: giovedì 27 novembre 2008 11.48
> Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Slowness
>
>
>> and try compile speedts
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Miguel Angel Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "xharbour
developer list"
Data invio: giovedì 27 novembre 2008 11.48
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Slowness
> and
Change this lines as:
classes.h
typedef struct hb_class_method
{
PHB_DYNS pMessage;/* Method Symbolic name */
PHB_FUNC pFunction; /* Function 'pointer' */
USHORT uiData; /* Item position for data (Harbour like,
begin from 1) */
USHORT uiDataS
Unfortunately latest xHarbour from CVS is somewhat very slow if compared
with Rev. 6231.
Any ideas on the possible reason?
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
The Best of Spectrum Games: http://www.emagsof
17 matches
Mail list logo
