[xmail] Re: relay record in log file

2003-03-13 Thread Frederik Gallon
ERELAY is telling you that you are not allowing messages to be relayed. Someone is trying to use your server to propagandate (likely) spam. It's telling you that you are safe ;-) -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: wyq [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 13 maart 2003 9:51

[xmail] Re: XMail-WAI.NET features discussion

2003-03-13 Thread Alex Young
Hi, the only 3 things I found lacking in WAI where; 1. No easy to use auto responder for the low level users, so I added one using an existing auto responder filter. 2. The ability to display html email correctly. 3. When you compose a message the ability to add an attachment. Other than

[xmail] Re: Local domain to remote domain

2003-03-13 Thread Frederik Gallon
I'm not totally sure but check smtpfwd.tab smtpgw.tab. Success -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Alex Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Verzonden: donderdag 13 maart 2003 12:34 Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: [xmail] Local domain to remote domain What is the best way for

[xmail] Log files

2003-03-13 Thread Alex Young
Is it possible to specify new log files every 24 hours at midnight? So its one log for 1 day and not one log for 24 hours like I have it set at the moment. Thanks, Alex - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general

[xmail] Re: CustMapsList

2003-03-13 Thread Boechie van den Brand
Yes, i'm interested in a configurable whitelist of ip's, not domain addresses. Boechie. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Davide Libenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 7:45 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: CustMapsList Hello Davide. Regarding the

[xmail] Re: anybody interested in xmail-1.12.ebuild for gentoo?

2003-03-13 Thread sergey ivanov
Davide Libenzi wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, sergey ivanov wrote: I may post files for this ebuild here, about 9 kb plain text or less than 4 kb in tar-bzip2ed form. ecartis is going to strip attachments. Than interested should see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15931 (gentoo use

[xmail] About Valasek's WAI

2003-03-13 Thread Serbulent Sertoglu
Sorry for asking this question here but I could neither join list for WAI nor contact personally to Valasek. I setup and configured WAI and now everything seems ok. The only problem is reading mails using Jmail. I receive ther error: jmail.POP3 error '8000' This function is not included

[xmail] Re: About Valasek's WAI

2003-03-13 Thread Michael Schwarz
You should use the version below... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Healy Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 10:14 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [xmail] Re: XMail-WAI en JMail Try this one

[xmail] Spamassassin user preferences

2003-03-13 Thread Riaz
Has anyone been able to implement spamassasin into xmail such that each individual user has their own preferences? Right now I can only change preferences on a global level, it would be nice have the ability to let users modify their own whitelist, no. of hit's required, etc... Thanks. Riaz..

[xmail] blaclist fixing

2003-03-13 Thread Serbulent Sertoglu
When I first setup xmail, it was open relay and it has used by spammers until I learnt how to prevent relay. Now I cannot send mail to some of the recipents and receive a mail that says I'm black listed. I copied the message I receive below. When I click the url it pointed out to fix the problem

[xmail] Re: blaclist fixing

2003-03-13 Thread William Denniss
Serbulent, There are two ways - one is just paitently waiting for people to auto rec= heck=20 your sever. The other is to go to all of the sites and request a retest.= =20 The former is the most relyable and wastes the less time. But goto the s= ites=20 of the ones that are causing bounced

[xmail] Re: blaclist fixing

2003-03-13 Thread William Denniss
Serbulent, There are two ways - one is just paitently waiting for people to auto rec= heck=20 your sever. The other is to go to all of the sites and request a retest.= =20 The former is the most relyable and wastes the less time. But goto the s= ites=20 of the ones that are causing bounced