On [Wed, 16.06. 13:54], Goesta Smekal wrote:
>
> Actually I'm about to write a filter checking if the HELO domain exists. Hints
> from Davide are welcome :-) ( for example, wyh doesn't xmail do this in the
> first place ? )
>
> stay tuned ...
... well, some nightly hacking and coding and my fil
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
> > It's ok. I get that too. It's the TLS data associated with the main=3D2=
0
> > thread, and it is intentionally never freed. It's not a leak since it
> > is a=3D =3D20
> > one-time allocation. I really do not know what is going on in you
> It's ok. I get that too. It's the TLS data associated with the main=20
> thread, and it is intentionally never freed. It's not a leak since it
> is a= =20
> one-time allocation. I really do not know what is going on in your=20
> machine.
After RSS was ~60MB:
* addr=0x080be6b8 size=892
At 11:54 6/16/2004, lac wrote:
>It's funny that the main reason why I'm running my own mail server is the
>spam. I like having a complete control over creating disposable email
>accounts. If I buy something from Amazon I create '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
>account. When I get spam addressed to '[EMAIL P
--- Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:24 6/16/2004, lac wrote:
> >Of course 1. and 2. are not feasible for about 99% of broadband users who
> >want to run a legitimate mail server. Static address and RDNS is out of
> the
> >question (an ISP usually charges a busisness rate for this)
>
> I
lac wrote:
>--- Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I can't speak for anyone else, but I've found that denying service to
>>"dynamic" addresses (based on RDNS patterns) to be a very effective tool
>>for reducing both spam and virus traffic. Since most (not all, as has been
>>pointed out he
>=20
> 1) Getting a static IP address from their provider so that you can
> whitelist the address
> 2) Getting "non-generic" RDNS assigned by their provider
[...]
Of course 1. and 2. are not feasible for about 99% of broadband users
who
want to run a legitimate mail server. Static address and RDN
At 10:24 6/16/2004, lac wrote:
>Of course 1. and 2. are not feasible for about 99% of broadband users who
>want to run a legitimate mail server. Static address and RDNS is out of the
>question (an ISP usually charges a busisness rate for this)
I think your percentage is a little high (I find the
--- Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't speak for anyone else, but I've found that denying service to
> "dynamic" addresses (based on RDNS patterns) to be a very effective tool
> for reducing both spam and virus traffic. Since most (not all, as has been
> pointed out here in the past) dyn
At 05:41 6/16/2004, Goesta Smekal wrote:
> We are facing a dramatic increase of SMTP traffic due to that. Since
> there is
>no attachment AV doesn't get it. Since there is no 'normal' sign of spam (like
>multiple recipients, junk characters etc.) spamfilters are unlikely to get it
>either.
I ca
At 18:34 14.6.2004, you wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Jun 2004, Roman Dusek wrote:
>
> > >If you look inside some slog file, you'll see "End of socket stream data"
> > >errors, that means that the connection has been dropped while XMail was
> > >trying to read data from the remote SMTP server. If this data ha
On [Wed, 16.06. 13:12], Achim Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Goesta,
>
> if you are running Spamassassin, some rulesets for stopping those mails
> are described right here:
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/foren/go.shtml?read=1&msg_id=5832097&forum_id=57381
>
This is exactly the way I _don't_ want to do
Hi Goesta,
if you are running Spamassassin, some rulesets for stopping those mails
are described right here:
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/foren/go.shtml?read=1&msg_id=5832097&forum_id=57381
good look,
Achim
Am Mi, 2004-06-16 um 11.41 schrieb Goesta Smekal:
> Hi list,
> anybody else annoy
On [Wed, 16.06. 11:41], Goesta Smekal wrote:
>
> *) why does RDNS not check ?
>
> *) where can we put a filter to do so ? pre-data sounds promising
>
I just read RFC 822 (again) and the HELO command should pass the domain. So,
Davide, is it the contents of this HELO string that ends up as sender
Hi list,
anybody else annoyed by right-wing political spam produced by hosts infected
by Sober.G ? (well it maybe a local problem to german speaking users ... anyway
it might spread)
We are facing a dramatic increase of SMTP traffic due to that. Since there is
no attachment AV doesn't get it.
I knew XMail recreated the numbered folders on start-up. I took if for
granted that as it recreated the numbered folders it would also recreate the
other two. I found the problem when I compared the problematic XMail server
to the other one which was still running fine.
-Original Message---
Yes I agree that $mailroot/spool/local and $mailroot/spool/temp are
documented and exist in distribution, but the problem occurs when someone
wants to clear out the spool they kill all the folders under $mailroot/spool
Yes I agree, if you don't know what your doing (and you kill too many
folders)
17 matches
Mail list logo
