[xmail] postmaster bounce messages

2004-07-14 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Hi, I noticed that bounce messages genearated by XMail do not have a empty MAIL_FROM but the postmaster address from server.tab. Normally bounce messages have empty return path, don't they? -- Sönke - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Second question: is there any way to configure XMail to block any > unauthenticated request from untrusted IP addresses (not in > SMTPRELAY.TAB), but still allow mail from the Barracuda to come in > (obviously the Barracuda is in SMTPRELAY.TAB) and allow our users to > relay with authentication?

[xmail] [Announce] XMail.NET released to opensource on GotDotNet.com

2004-07-14 Thread Shawn Anderson
If any one is interested, I have just finished posting the first release of XMail.NET to GotDotNet. You can access it from: http://workspaces.gotdotnet.com/xmaildotnet This library contains the following: - CTRL Protocol Interface - Support for batch commands to CTRL - V

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread John Kielkopf
Kirk Friggstad wrote: >Hey all: > >We've recently installed a Barracuda (rack-mount "spam firewall" based on >Spam Assassin, also does virus scanning) on our network in front of our >XMail system, and pointed our MX records to deliver mail to the Barracuda >instead of directly to our server. This

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Adrian Hicks
Over here we use an outside service to pass mail to our XMail box; somewhat similar to your setup. We can then specify only certain IP addresses that can send to port 25 on the XMail box. If you're running XMail on Linux then you can use the IPTables firewall to restrict access. I'm sure on a

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Filip Supera
Tim Aranki wrote: > Can someone post a good list of services to use with CustMapsList? I don't > have one. Those give excellent results on my server : dnsbl.sorbs.net (the best for me) sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org dnsbl.njabl.org bl.spamcop.net list.dsbl.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Tim Aranki
Most virii will come from home users. I would try using CustMapsList (server.tab), and perhaps "SMTP-RDNSCheck" (also in server.tab). Can someone post a good list of services to use with CustMapsList? I don't have one. -tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Kirk Friggstad
> If you have a publicly accessable IP address on your server it will always > be open to smtp traffic regardless of MX records. Does your Barracuda > device also contain a stateful firewall? "Firewall" is perhaps too strong of a word for what the Barracuda does - it accepts incoming SMTP connect

[xmail] Re: Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Jeffrey Laramie
On Wednesday 14 July 2004 17:00, Kirk Friggstad wrote: > Hey all: > > We've recently installed a Barracuda (rack-mount "spam firewall" based on > Spam Assassin, also does virus scanning) on our network in front of our > XMail system, and pointed our MX records to deliver mail to the Barracuda > ins

[xmail] Spammers / viruses bypassing MX records?

2004-07-14 Thread Kirk Friggstad
Hey all: We've recently installed a Barracuda (rack-mount "spam firewall" based on Spam Assassin, also does virus scanning) on our network in front of our XMail system, and pointed our MX records to deliver mail to the Barracuda instead of directly to our server. This change was made over a month

[xmail] Relaying

2004-07-14 Thread Jeffrey L. Conley
I am running 1.18 on both my primary and my secondary. I have the same exact smtprelay.tab file on both servers. My primary does not relay but no matter what I do my secondary relays everything. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [E

[xmail] Re: X-Deliver-To problem

2004-07-14 Thread Ert
No, you misunderstood. There are redirects. Anyway, I am home now. So, I can send you all my config tomorrow. Thanks.. --- Tim Aranki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can you give us some more config details? Filters? Mailproc? Etc... This HAS > to be a config problem, or everyone would be having thi

[xmail] Re: X-Deliver-To problem

2004-07-14 Thread Tim Aranki
Can you give us some more config details? Filters? Mailproc? Etc... This HAS to be a config problem, or everyone would be having this issue, and this is the first I have heard of it. Are you sure that there is no redirect anywhere? -tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:

[xmail] Re: X-Deliver-To problem

2004-07-14 Thread Ert
--- "Hartmann, Waehrisch & Feykes GmbH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the reason may be that one account has a redirect to the other (check > mailproc.tab) > No, redirects are working well. I am sure about this, because when I send to one address per one mail, it goes to where it has to. but the m

[xmail] Re: X-Deliver-To problem

2004-07-14 Thread Hartmann, Waehrisch & Feykes GmbH
the reason may be that one account has a redirect to the other (check mailproc.tab) - Original Message - From: "Kaan Ertürk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "XMail Mail List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:11 PM Subject: [xmail] X-Deliver-To problem > When I send 2 mails

[xmail] X-Deliver-To problem (revised)

2004-07-14 Thread Ert
the main problem is not the X-Deliver-To header. I fixed it withReceivedHdrType option. the main problem is that server delivers the mails according to the number of recipients in thew "To" section. I mean, if I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I only recieve mail

[xmail] X-Deliver-To problem

2004-07-14 Thread Ert
When I send 2 mails to my domain's 2 different addresses the X-Deliver-To header of both messages become same. I mean, I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] as typing the addresses to the "To" section by comas and both of them have the X-Deliver-To header as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".