At 19:32 7/28/2004, Gerald V. Livingston II wrote:
>With one exception. Using SMTP AUTH I know who's account to shut down for
>abuse without ever having to leave the mail log and cross reference a
>connection log. Especailly if the user is sending mail while connected via
>some other ISP or corport
Or have them set up and use SMTPAuth, the program.
http://www.software.bisswanger.de/en/index.php?seite=smtp
Gerald
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:28:00 -0500 Shiloh Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If somebody has an email client that won't support SMTP AUTH, =
> convince
> then to upgrade to a v
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:16:11 -0400 Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
> >Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
> >AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
> >especially when one of the PCs gets a
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 22:39, Tracy wrote:
> At 21:32 7/27/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> >On Tuesday 27 July 2004 20:13, John Kielkopf wrote:
> > > http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=209.12.136.106
> > >
> > > Yeah, looks like you have no PTR record visible. Your bandwidth
> > > provider sh
At 14:28 7/28/2004, Shiloh Jennings wrote:
>Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
>AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
>especially when one of the PCs gets a virus on it. Even using POP
>before SMTP is a bad idea in my opinion becaus
If you do not want to require SMTP AUTH, you could list your local IP
addresses in the smtprelay.tab file. Then those IPs could relay without
authentication.
Personally, I think it is a better idea to require everybody to use SMTP
AUTH to relay. Trusting IPs opens the door to a lot of relaying,
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 19:32 +0200, Philippe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wan't to authorize any one on my lan to send mail with my xmail Server (without
> authentication)
>
> With Mozilla 1.6 or Outook Express 6, no problem
> With Netscape 4.78 (i know it's old), it ask me user login. Of course the POP
Hello,
I wan't to authorize any one on my lan to send mail with my xmail Server (without
authentication)
With Mozilla 1.6 or Outook Express 6, no problem
With Netscape 4.78 (i know it's old), it ask me user login. Of course the POP3 server
is not on the same server.
I tried to change EnableAut
At 09:13 7/28/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>While looking at the report from dnsreports.com I see that they are warning
>that my mail server doesn't accept "domain literals". I seem to recall
>reading somewhere recently that this was no longer required or even
>desirable. Any thoughts on this? If I
Morning All,
Well I'm still waiting for my ISP to resolve my RDNS problem but at least I
know it's not a problem with my mail server.
While looking at the report from dnsreports.com I see that they are warning
that my mail server doesn't accept "domain literals". I seem to recall
reading somew
Hello,
i have Filters Antivirus, Iptables, webmail.
i compile xmail with make -f Makefile.lnx
Nothing Strange.
Thank you
- Original Message -
>From : Goesta Smekal - IT executive
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date : Tuesday, 27 July, 2004 04:00 PM
Sub : [xmail] Re: A
11 matches
Mail list logo