At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Hi All-
>
>The mail server belonging to a client of mine "mail.client.com" uses another
>server "relay.client.com" to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to
>be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this
>domain is
On Thursday 11 November 2004 19:28, Tracy wrote:
> At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> >Hi All-
> >
> >The mail server belonging to a client of mine "mail.client.com" uses
> > another server "relay.client.com" to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com
> > appears to be correctly configured
At 19:22 11/11/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Hi All-
>
>The mail server belonging to a client of mine "mail.client.com" uses another
>server "relay.client.com" to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to
>be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this
>domain is
Hi All-
The mail server belonging to a client of mine "mail.client.com" uses another
server "relay.client.com" to relay outgoing mail. mail.client.com appears to
be correctly configured but relay.client.com doesn't resolve. Mail from this
domain is bounced when it fails the XMail RDNS check. I'
Marvellous. I am now using it with F-Prot and Sophos side by side. All
looks to be working great. Hopefully if F-Prot misses it Sophos will catch
it.
Thanks,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason J. Ellingson
Sent: 10 November 2004
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:40 =
PM:
> At 07:34 11/11/2004, S=3DF6nke Ruempler wrote:
>> You did not understand me. In my case is not the recipient invalid,
>> but =3D3D the sender ! Xmail accepts the Mail while an Exchange =
behind
>> Xmail doesn't.=20
>=20
> True. Th
At 07:34 11/11/2004, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>You did not understand me. In my case is not the recipient invalid, but =3D
>the
>sender ! Xmail accepts the Mail while an Exchange behind Xmail doesn't.
True. This is one of those situations where using a connection to the=20
forwarded server at pre-d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Thursday, November 11, 2004 1:14 =
PM:
> Myself, if I'm forwarding all mail for a domain, I request a
> list of all=3D20
> valid users / aliases for the domain, so I can do local
> validity checking=3D20
> before accepting a message for forwarding (in essence,
> setting
At 02:03 11/11/2004, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 4:01 =3D
>PM:
>
> > Why are you accepting, then bouncing, mail? In today's
> > climate of widely=3D3D20
> > forged envelope senders, it doesn't make sense to accept then bounce
> > - as=3D3D20 much
